• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News avoids Porter Story

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
FOX is pretty much the official ass kissing Trump network meant for the Trumpkins so this should not surprise anyone. They ceased to have any journalistic credibility a very long time ago.
 
FOX is pretty much the official ass kissing Trump network meant for the Trumpkins so this should not surprise anyone. They ceased to have any journalistic credibility a very long time ago.

At least Bret Baier mentioned Porter's name.
 
Seems to me what many on the right are missing here is not that Porter had a propensity to take out his frustrations on his wive's with his fists. It's that he didn't have a top security clearance for the materials that surely came across his desk. The same stuff the right was railing about with Hillary Clinton.

It just amazes me how both parties are such hypocrites.
 
Fox News has lost any and all credibility it once had.



Rob Porter scandal: Everywhere but Fox News - Feb. 8, 2018
As showed below foxhas covered the story. Msnbc on the other hand has not covered the newest texts by page and storzk or the grassley/graham criminal recommendation that has come out. Apparently trump considering the possibility of having a parade is to important to break away from to mention either of those meaningless stories

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
As showed below foxhas covered the story. Msnbc on the other hand has not covered the newest texts by page and storzk or the grassley/graham criminal recommendation that has come out. Apparently trump considering the possibility of having a parade is to important to break away from to mention either of those meaningless stories

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

They didn't talk about it on TV.
 
It was on tv too, they talked about it.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

CNN's analysis says they barely mentioned it. I would trust them to keep up with their competition better than any posters here
 
CNN doesn't even pretend to be a real news source anymore.
 
CNN's analysis says they barely mentioned it. I would trust them to keep up with their competition better than any posters here
Has CNN given any coverage to the new texts or grassley memo?

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
Fox News has lost any and all credibility it once had.



Rob Porter scandal: Everywhere but Fox News - Feb. 8, 2018

Personally I would widen the scope of your critique, our entire 6 multinational corporate controlled state media machine is worth avoiding across the board. If you object to this crap, stop participating, reposting and cooperating. The media machine was taken over by concentrated corporate wealth and power once Clinton deregulated the FCC; it is no longer any kind of asset to the people, but rather a means of population control and perceptual reality manipulation.
 
Personally I would widen the scope of your critique, our entire 6 multinational corporate controlled state media machine is worth avoiding across the board. If you object to this crap, stop participating, reposting and cooperating. The media machine was taken over by concentrated corporate wealth and power once Clinton deregulated the FCC; it is no longer any kind of asset to the people, but rather a means of population control and perceptual reality manipulation.

Sure, I'll just never get news then. That's better.
 
CNN's analysis says they barely mentioned it. I would trust them to keep up with their competition better than any posters here

I have Fox on in the background as I work around the house this morning, and the story has been mentioned at least 3 times. Kelly's responses have been read and put up on the screen in full. Predictions that Porter will leave his post today.
It's being covered.
Of course Fox isn't using it to underpin the narrative that Trump is evil and Hope Hicks is a dirty little whore.
eta: photos of his victims were shown, too.

This isn't being prettied up.
 
Fox News has lost any and all credibility it once had.
Ya see. This is what can happen when you believe a commentary by some teenager that works at CNN Money rather than checking for yourself.
Makes you both look bad.
Here, a person can post any opinion they want to believe even though it's not true. CNN shouldn't have that excuse.
 
At least Bret Baier mentioned Porter's name.

He did? When was that? As far as I know, he is on vacation.

Special Report, which is the evening hard news program on Fox (and the best nightly news of any network) didn't just "mention Porter's name", it was the #2 story behind the announcement of bipartisan agreement on a new 2 year budget deal.

You have gained quite a reputation of posting hit pieces that end up being untrue... You really need to stop taking your marching orders from far left websites and do your own damned research. It's far less embarrassing and won't make you look like such a partisan stooge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L-EUpl8JwE

.
 
I have Fox on in the background as I work around the house this morning, and the story has been mentioned at least 3 times. Kelly's responses have been read and put up on the screen in full. Predictions that Porter will leave his post today.
It's being covered.
Of course Fox isn't using it to underpin the narrative that Trump is evil and Hope Hicks is a dirty little whore.
eta: photos of his victims were shown, too.

This isn't being prettied up.

You miss the point which is to just get a false negative narrative out so it can be eagerly repeated by the ethically challenged.
 
Back
Top Bottom