- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 17,865
- Reaction score
- 8,344
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
For those who use links to England's Daily Mail
That "little or no punishment" comment is obviously related to the fact that the Daily Mail had more dishonest headlines in 2017 than in 2016, a year when there were 17 findings by IPSOS versus the 37 for 2017.
Link to IPSOS "Rulings and Resolutions" page
The Daily Mail Is by Far the Most Inaccurate (Dishonest?) Paper in Britain
In 2017 the Daily Mail was by far the biggest offender when it came to making up inaccurate content. They had 37 inaccuracy-based complaints against them upheld by the press self-regulator IPSO. That's more than twice as many as the two next worst offenders (the Daily Express and The S*n
It’s important to bear in mind that these 37 upheld complaints only scratch the surface of the dishonesty and inaccuracy of the mainstream press. IPSO only proceeds with investigations if newspaper content provokes a wave of public complaints. Even if numerous people do complain, it’s entirely up to IPSO whether they bother conducting an investigation or not.
Even though the complaints procedure is so inadequate, the number of rulings against inaccurate content paint a concerning picture of a right-wing dominated mediascape where cynical hacks working for billionaire propaganda barons (Jonathan Harmsworth, Rupert Murdoch, the Barclay brothers) consider themselves free to make up reams of inaccurate content, safe in the knowledge that they’ll receive little or no punishment, even on the occasions that the toothless press regulator bothers to investigate and proves them to be liars.
That "little or no punishment" comment is obviously related to the fact that the Daily Mail had more dishonest headlines in 2017 than in 2016, a year when there were 17 findings by IPSOS versus the 37 for 2017.
Link to IPSOS "Rulings and Resolutions" page