• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

USA Today Torches Trump

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
What's with the W. love? That dude was a monster.
 
Here is the Trump tweet:

Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
Democrats say Trump's tweets about Sen. Gillibrand are sexist, crude - Chicago Tribune

Does anyone see the word "whore" (slut, prostitute, etc.) anywhere in that tweet?

I'm certain I've seen that kind of language used before against people of all political persuasions by opponents labeling anyone who will do anything to get their agenda accomplished.

Of course, leave it to the anti-Trump elements to push the "sexist" angle...since the "collusion" angle isn't going all that well.

The "impeach him by any means necessary" activism is in full swing. :coffeepap:
 
Here is the Trump tweet:

Democrats say Trump's tweets about Sen. Gillibrand are sexist, crude - Chicago Tribune

Does anyone see the word "whore" (slut, prostitute, etc.) anywhere in that tweet?

I'm certain I've seen that kind of language used before against people of all political persuasions by opponents labeling anyone who will do anything to get their agenda accomplished.

Of course, leave it to the anti-Trump elements to push the "sexist" angle...since the "collusion" angle isn't going all that well. :coffeepap:

Come on. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows EXACTLY what he meant. You choose to put your head in the sand is your problem.
 
Come on. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows EXACTLY what he meant. You choose to put your head in the sand is your problem.

No, people with a clear political bias will see what they want to see.

I see a standard political slam that has been around in one form or another since I was a kid, used against both male and female politicians.

Not something that is especially "sexist" when used against a woman. :shrug:

How many of us have said much the same thing about various government officials (and brown-nosing co-workers) over the years? :coffeepap:

P.S.:

I am amazed by the hypocritical outrage displayed by people (some in this Forum) who have no problem calling political opponents every dirty name in the book in blatant ad hominin attacks; but claim the moral high ground at the slightest use of such tactics...targeting their "allies." :roll:
 
Last edited:
Here is the Trump tweet:

Democrats say Trump's tweets about Sen. Gillibrand are sexist, crude - Chicago Tribune

Does anyone see the word "whore" (slut, prostitute, etc.) anywhere in that tweet?

I'm certain I've seen that kind of language used before against people of all political persuasions by opponents labeling anyone who will do anything to get their agenda accomplished.

Of course, leave it to the anti-Trump elements to push the "sexist" angle...since the "collusion" angle isn't going all that well.

The "impeach him by any means necessary" activism is in full swing. :coffeepap:


Trump does not earn the benefit of the doubt. You can thank his reputation with women for that one.
 
If Trump is still in office in 2020, I expect that the Republic party will be dead and gone and will never rise to the levels that it used to be at. Trump and his alt right/Banonite loons have destroyed the party and I think its beyond repair. The fact that the President of the United States would say something like this publicly is a disgrace to the United States, and every citizen should be embarrassed that this scrum is who is our highest elected official.
 
We get it, the media hates Trump. Is this just going to continue to be the "Media Hate Trump Olympics" where they compete to show how much blatant bias they have?

Why do you think the media hates Trump? Seems that they made him president with constant focus on Hillary’s problems. He’s entertaining, good copy as the saying goes, never fails to deliver outrageous comments.
 
We get it, the media hates Trump. Is this just going to continue to be the "Media Hate Trump Olympics" where they compete to show how much blatant bias they have?

Look. Reuters, BBC, Radio Francais and Izvestia say similar things. And these guys are not part of the MSM. So there must be a grain of truth to what these guys say after all.
 
What's with the W. love? That dude was a monster.

Yes, true. He was a giant screw-up, but Trump has put me in the mind-set that W. wasn't so bad. I know, I know - it's not true, and W. was pretty bad, but compared to Trump? Nah, not such a nightmare anymore. :lol:
 
Come on. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows EXACTLY what he meant. You choose to put your head in the sand is your problem.

You will never get these people to admit that Herr Trump did anything wrong. Ever. No matter how ridiculous his comments, no matter how outrageous his tweets, you will always have his lapdogs justifying what he says.
 
W had a good heart.
He was just dumber than a sledload of ****.

I don't know the guy, but he owns the Iraq war. Being dumb just isn't enough of an excuse to me.
 
No, people with a clear political bias will see what they want to see.

I see a standard political slam that has been around in one form or another since I was a kid, used against both male and female politicians.

Not something that is especially "sexist" when used against a woman. :shrug:

How many of us have said much the same thing about various government officials (and brown-nosing co-workers) over the years? :coffeepap:

P.S.:

I am amazed by the hypocritical outrage displayed by people (some in this Forum) who have no problem calling political opponents every dirty name in the book in blatant ad hominin attacks; but claim the moral high ground at the slightest use of such tactics...targeting their "allies." :roll:

Yes I'm sure the ***** grabber and chief intended the statement to be completely innocuous.:doh
 
I read some of this fake crap about our President. One may add about every president not being perfect.
Our former dictator Barack " 2chainz" Obama is one prime example.
 
What's with the W. love? That dude was a monster.

Liberals and neverTrumpers are willing to side with devils, monsters, and all sorts of sub-humans. All of a sudden liberals have discovered a new found love for Bush, Reagan, and the entire neo-con agenda. It makes me think their outrage during Dubya's presidency was nothing more than a show.
 
Back
Top Bottom