• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

USA Today Torches Trump

Fishking said:
Nah...almost all of Obama's comments were scripted and he liked to stay on script, but actions speak louder than words. I'm sorry words hurt you so much but there are millions of Libyans that I'm sure would have preferred words from Obama instead of bombs.
Click to expand...

So you got nothing and your original comment was total bull****. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
Top Cat said:
So you got nothing and your original comment was total bull****. Thanks for clearing that up.
Click to expand...

I have maintained everything from my original comment. That you don't understand is your shortfall, not mine.
 
GDViking said:
The point is not about where it started, it is about what the cons are doing about it.
Click to expand...

What is there to do about it? To fix Libya would pretty much require yet another war in and of itself at this point. To fix Syria it means doubling down and supporting Assad, which would cause the short sighted and biased MSM to excoriate anyone involved. Plus the U.S. has not yet fully extricated itself from the position of support the radical Islamic Terrorists moderate rebels.

People need to recognize that just because a dictator is a horrible disgusting slimeball, that doesn't mean the U.S. should get involved in their overthrow. And as exemplified by Gaddafi, sometimes these radical madmen moderate overtime. (This isn't excusing Gaddaffi for his past crimes).
 
Fishking said:
Lol...what news where you watching? Hillary got mostly a pass by the media.
Click to expand...

That's because there is really nothing there. Selling "newspapers" through sensationalism works best when the story has grounding. That way, you can maintain the sensationalism and sell more "newspapers." Crying wolf, over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over, only maintains the entertained flock while losing credibility.
 
Rogue Valley said:
Don't use crap sources and nobody will have to point them out.
Click to expand...

You crying about a source makes no valid point. If you can't bother to read, the fault is yours, and not anyone else's.
 
I mean come the **** on folks ................ it's been OBVIOUS for decades, at least for those like myself that have been paying attention that Trump treats women worse than a piece of toilet tissue when he is wiping his own ass ................ he only purchases their silence with borrowed money ................ money borrowed from Russians ...............
 
Fishking said:
You crying about a source makes no valid point. If you can't bother to read, the fault is yours, and not anyone else's.
Click to expand...

When you quote Canada's equivalent of Alex Jones, people are going to call you out on it. I thought "this was your wheelhouse", you would think you know know better.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
When you quote Canada's equivalent of Alex Jones, people are going to call you out on it. I thought "this was your wheelhouse", you would think you know know better.
Click to expand...

Does't matter. It either has valid info or it doesn't. I don't put MSMs in a high enough pedestal to not say the same thing but, you know what I do?....I read the damn thing to see what it says and evaluate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom