• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hannity encourages fans breaking Keurig coffee makers after company pulls ads

The sleazebag Moore is toast. Yesterday, the Chairman of the Republican Senatorial Committee (Sen. Cory Gardner R/CO) issued a statement that if Moore does not withdraw and wins, the Senate (⅔ vote required) will vote to expel him.


Which may actually be the plan. get the guy in, expell him, then the gov gets to appoint, no?
 
My sig answers that question. MM sets the standard for smear operations. That's what they do and that's how they do it.

And it's all tax free, in the public interest, and to promote the general welfare. We all support David Brock whether we like it or not, and he's laughing his ass off about it everyday, I'm sure.
 
Well, that’s pretty ridiculous. People aren’t going to destroy their $100+ Kuerigs in protest. Stupid to even ask. Sounds like an effective use of social pressure to influence a large corporation.

Seems you've overestimated Hannity fans:

 
His behavior of pointing out: “Every single person in this country deserves the presumption of innocence,” Hannity said. “With the allegations against Judge Moore, none of us know the truth of what happened 38 years ago. The only people that would know are the people involved in this incident.” The Fox News host added that Moore “should step aside and leave the Senate race” if the allegations are true."


What a horrible thing to say! :shock:

Yes, and which one is likely to lie? The political hack, the partisan judge with a chip on his shoulder and a well-documented pervy side, or five women with nothing to lose?

Why do you believe politicians over regular everyday people?
 
Yes, and which one is likely to lie? The political hack, the partisan judge with a chip on his shoulder and a well-documented pervy side, or five women with nothing to lose?

Why do you believe politicians over regular everyday people?



I don't. I've said over and over again, moore is most likely the dirtbag he appears to be. but hannity's comments are the correct ones. we have a presumption of innocence here and nothing he said was out of line or even controversial.
 
Sounds like a good reason not to watch him.
 
If trump looks like an idiot and the media reports truthfully, we'd all be much better off.

but since the media constantly lies and has been shown to doctor the tapes, how sure you are that he's as big an idiot as you are being told he is?

Trump constantly acts like an ass. It's his major appeal to his base. They see as straight forward and honest. I just have a different viewpoint. For instance, he never denied his tweet about how Tillerson was wasting his time trying to talk to NK. Way to undercut your own secretary of state. There is all sorts of stuff in the public record that makes him look bad. The latest is that he believes Putin, but supports the US intelligence agencies. Then he clarified and said he believes Putin doesn't think he interfered in our election. The intelligence agencies say he did. Did Putin do this in his sleep? Does he have multiple personalities, and one of the other ones did it? Was Putin lying? What's more likely?
 
Looks like Hannity is going to be the latest hypocrite to fall from the Fox News Alter. Maybe the pressure to preform got to him. :mrgreen:

Altar, not alter.

Why's he a hypocrite?

Hannity fans have every right to boycott Keurig the way they are Hannity.
 
Trump constantly acts like an ass. It's his major appeal to his base. They see as straight forward and honest. I just have a different viewpoint. For instance, he never denied his tweet about how Tillerson was wasting his time trying to talk to NK. Way to undercut your own secretary of state. There is all sorts of stuff in the public record that makes him look bad. The latest is that he believes Putin, but supports the US intelligence agencies. Then he clarified and said he believes Putin doesn't think he interfered in our election. The intelligence agencies say he did. Did Putin do this in his sleep? Does he have multiple personalities, and one of the other ones did it? Was Putin lying? What's more likely?

Not constantly, but he certainly doesn't always know when to shut up, but he's not the type to hide behind handlers and speechwriters like we're accustomed to. I much prefer the unrefined honesty of President Trump than a puppy-mill politician with Madison Avenue talking points.

Sadly, we're so accustomed to wax figures in suits that we actually think there's something wrong with Trump's bluntness. I find those prone to blind belief in liberal media outrage about it the most likely to be up in arms over it. Trump bluntly tells people off without a flinch and people love it. It's something we should have been getting from political leadership the entire time, instead of this back door deal-making and back-scratching that usually goes on.

The media basically has nothing else to say about Trump, and outlets that fixate on him 24/7 are doing so because of a spike in subscriptions and viewers by people who hate him. Since there's no real dirt on Trump, the media gives their subscribers and viewers whatever anti-Trump material they can find, and it's usually penny-ante garbage which is why so many stories are outright manufactured and words twisted.

They simply lack legitimate material.
 
I don't. I've said over and over again, moore is most likely the dirtbag he appears to be. but hannity's comments are the correct ones. we have a presumption of innocence here and nothing he said was out of line or even controversial.

When you let a rapist defend himself live on air. There is nothing "correct" about it!
 
And it's all tax free, in the public interest, and to promote the general welfare. We all support David Brock whether we like it or not, and he's laughing his ass off about it everyday, I'm sure.

The man exerts tremendous influence and makes a great living pulling salaries from numerous organizations he began to enable him to do it while supplying friendly "journalists" with leads & stories they then report without source attribution.
 
If you don't see what a sham this "interview," was then you should stop trying now.

TRANSLATION: you created your own version of what Hannity said based on something other than his actual spoken words.
 
TRANSLATION: you created your own version of what Hannity said based on something other than his actual spoken words.

I don't care what he talked about with Roy Moore, the purpose of the interview was to give him a chance to defend himself. If you do that, you aren't much better than the rapist.
Hannity gave him a voice while everyone else was pulling away and wanted nothing to do with the creep. That should be a big hint.
 
When you let a rapist defend himself live on air. There is nothing "correct" about it!

Hannity didn't pull any punches in this interview. Even some left wing pundits have acknowledged this. You obviously haven't looked passed the issued talking points. So pathetic. :roll:
 
I don't care what he talked about with Roy Moore, the purpose of the interview was to give him a chance to defend himself. If you do that, you aren't much better than the rapist.
Hannity gave him a voice while everyone else was pulling away and wanted nothing to do with the creep. That should be a big hint.

Oooooooh.
So interviews should only be given to the innocent.
Then all those Hillary Clinton interviews that were intended to give her a chance to defend herself should not have been allowed.
 
Oooooooh.
So interviews should only be given to the innocent.
Then all those Hillary Clinton interviews that were intended to give her a chance to defend herself should not have been allowed.

Hillary Clinton may be a liar, but she is not a rapist. Roy Moore is both.
 
Bill was accused of rape and lied about it. You hadn't heard?

Bill Clinton has been accused of some pervy things. I admit that. I am not a Democrat so I don't care about Bill Clinton. He can fall in line with all the other pervy men who do this crap but despite the numerous pervy things that Bill Clinton did, none of them are worse than what Roy Moore did. The two men may be only be comparable in the assault portion of this. As far as I am concerned what Roy Moore did was 1000X worse than anything Bill Clinton did. Bill Clinton got a BJ in the Oval Office. Roy Moore touched children.
 
What a class act. It's his fault Keurig pulled the ads yet he blames the left for pointing out his deplorable stances and troll-like behavior.

It's not his fault. it's the fault of the Lies of Mediamatters and The Hill
 
Back
Top Bottom