• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Lied About Lynch-Clinton Tarmac Meeting, 30 Page Document to be Released Next Month

truthatallcost said:
The FBI has found 30 pages of documents related to the June 2016 airport tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, even after the bureau claimed to not have any records related to the matter.

FBI lawyers revealed the existence of the records in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, the conservative watchdog group.

The FBI had informed Judicial Watch last October that the bureau did not have any records related to the June 27, 2016 meeting between Clinton and Lynch. That encounter, which occurred on the tarmac at Phoenix’s airport, was significant because it took place while the Justice Department was investigating Hillary Clinton’s potential mishandling of classified information on her private email account.

“It is stunning that the FBI ‘found’ these Clinton-Lynch tarmac records only after we caught the agency hiding them in another lawsuit.”

New FBI Docs About Clinton-Lynch Meeting | The Daily Caller
Click to expand...

11 pages in and I'm still unsure what's the real deal here...

Is it that Judicial Watch found evidence that the FBI did document the meeting that took place on the tarmac between former AG Lynch and Bill Clinton or that Judicial Watch uncovered the details of said meeting inwhich they discussed more than what they originally let on?

Which is it?

As far as I'm concerned, discovering that the FBI documenting that the meeting did, in fact, take place isn't a big deal to me. I mean, it's not like this was some "Deep Throat" revelation. We already knew the meeting took place because Lynch and Bill talked about it to the media on several occasions. So, there's nothing in the OP I didn't already know. If, however, Judicial Watch uncovers some nugget about the meeting that wasn't made public that's of intrigue, well..."You've got my attention, Rose."

Right now, IMO, this is a "nuthin' burger" of epic proportions.
 
Last edited:
The FBI has till Nov. 30th under court order to release the thirty documents to Judicial Watch.

FBI has been stonewalling on the release of several documents whether they be FOIA requests to requests from Congress over the Russian investigation including the actions of the FBI over the Trump Dossier, the unmasking of Americans during the Obama administration among other things.

Today Speaker Ryan made a public plea to the FBI to stop stonewalling and fulfill the requests.
 
holbritter said:
No. They story is THE FBI LIED. If that's ok with you fine. It's not with me and I hope it's investigated.

Which actually brings up what was so important in the documents that they hid their existence? I guess that doesn't concern you either. :shrug:
Click to expand...
They didnt necesarrily lied. They may not of known they had files. Theres multiple questions that need to be asked and answered.

1.Did they knowingly withold information
If so, why?
2. If they didn't do it intentionally than what systemic problem do we have that they dont what they have and what needs to be implimented to fix it?
3. The files themselves need to be reviewed to see if they contain any information that warants investigating.

All that stuff needs to be sorted out.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Wouldn't a shorter list be those events in which the FBI actually made truthful statements, compared to those events in which it lied?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom