• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Colbert to Interview Clinton

Phys251 said:
Free speech for all!!
Click to expand...

Obviously. :shrug: But I'm not not the one who seemed to think it was a defense against the criticism in this thread. After all, why else would you bring up something that no one disputed?
 
Harshaw said:
Obviously. :shrug: But I'm not not the one who seemed to think it was a defense against the criticism in this thread. After all, why else would you bring up something that no one disputed?
Click to expand...

It is fascinating that some people on the Right claim to want to maximize all the freeze peach, but when someone on the Left wants to use those rights? Er mah gerd we gotta shut 'em down!!
 
Phys251 said:
It is fascinating that some people on the Right claim to want to maximize all the freeze peach, but when someone on the Left wants to use those rights? Er mah gerd we gotta shut 'em down!!
Click to expand...

Did you know that mocking someone, especially on a message board like this, isn't actually "shutting 'em down"? Well, now you do.

tumblr_nj4fgeWetz1qk08n1o1_500.gif
 
Harshaw said:
Did you know that mocking someone, especially on a message board like this, isn't actually "shutting 'em down"? Well, now you do.
Click to expand...

Please spare this knowledgeable person a lecture on what it means to try to shut someone down.

I continue to be fascinated with the Right's inability to let Hillary Clinton go. She should have been in y'all's rearview mirror by December 2016. I wonder why y'all an't let her go?
 
Ikari said:
I don't know, did Jimmy Carter write books and go on tour? I think he just started building houses and such.

Clinton won't go away because I fear she's trying to keep in the public mindset to make a 3rd run at the Presidency.
Click to expand...

Actually Carter became a fly in the state department's bonnet by launching a series of personal foreign policy trips. People were suggesting he retire as well. Eventually he did and started building houses.
 
Phys251 said:
Please spare this knowledgeable person a lecture on what it means to try to shut someone down.
Click to expand...

Then why did you think mocking her is trying to shut her down?

I continue to be fascinated with the Right's inability to let Hillary Clinton go. She should have been in y'all's rearview mirror by December 2016. I wonder why y'all an't let her go?
Click to expand...

Let's see; this thread was started by a non-Righty, the first person to ask why she can't just go away was a Lefty, and every other post save one before you chimed in was made by persons not of the Right.

So, not only was no one trying to shut anyone down, the sentiments expressed weren't from the "Right."

For such a self-proclaimed "knowledgeable person," you sure don't seem to know what's going on around you in the thread.
 
Harshaw said:
Then why did you think mocking her is trying to shut her down?



Let's see; this thread was started by a non-Righty, the first person to ask why she can't just go away was a Lefty, and every other post save one before you chimed in was made by persons not of the Right.

So, not only was no one trying to shut anyone down, the sentiments expressed weren't from the "Right."

For such a self-proclaimed "knowledgeable person," you sure don't seem to know what's going on around you in the thread.
Click to expand...

You were on the winning side of last year's election. Why are you getting upset by what I say? Shouldn't this be a non-issue to you?
 
Phys251 said:
You were on the winning side of last year's election. Why are you getting upset by what I say? Shouldn't this be a non-issue to you?
Click to expand...

No, I wasn't. Gary Johnson, you may recall, didn't win.

And I'm highly entertained by what you say and how you keep stepping on rakes, while claiming to be so superior. Why would I not be? Slow-motion train wrecks are always good viewing.

No one forces you to say dumb things, but I'm glad you do.

No one's trying to shut anyone down here, and no one's trying to deny anyone's right to speak. You're out of your tree.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Carter was publicly involved in a few things after which kept his profile high. I think.
I hate all these old people running for President. I wouldn't mind Rubio or The Rock. Get these old people out!
Click to expand...

I wouldnt mind watching a cage match between the Rock and Rubio, maybe have Hillary run in and slide a collapsible chair over to Marco after the Rock's pumelled him into the matt, but I dont see any one of those clowns in Politics ever
 
Harshaw said:
No, I wasn't. Gary Johnson, you may recall, didn't win.
Click to expand...

Ah. On that I stand corrected.

And I'm highly entertained by what you say and how you keep stepping on rakes, while claiming to be so superior. Why would I not be? Slow-motion train wrecks are always good viewing.

No one forces you to say dumb things, but I'm glad you do.

No one's trying to shut anyone down here, and no one's trying to deny anyone's right to speak. You're out of your tree.
Click to expand...

Like I said. I'm not the one getting worked up here. One would think that those who disliked Clinton would be able to more easily put her in the rearview mirror. Guess not. :shrug:
 
Phys251 said:
Ah. On that I stand corrected.



Like I said. I'm not the one getting worked up here. One would think that those who disliked Clinton would be able to more easily put her in the rearview mirror. Guess not. :shrug:
Click to expand...

No, I rather think you are. I'm enjoying the show. And I haven't actually said a word about Clinton herself anywhere in this.

Again, you don't seem to know what's going on around you. It's fun watching you stumble around into walls.
 
Winston said:
Why won't she just go away?

Did Dukakis tour the nation after he lost to George Bush Sr.? (genuine question)
Click to expand...

There are elections in 2018 that she needs to screw up.
 
Harshaw said:
No, I rather think you are. I'm enjoying the show. And I haven't actually said a word about Clinton herself anywhere in this.

Again, you don't seem to know what's going on around you. It's fun watching you stumble around into walls.
Click to expand...

Whatever floats your boat, man.
 
Colbert is what is known as a lw 'useful idiot"

Clinton should be a political satirist's gold mine.
But ,,,you know...Trump...cockholster( cue OUTRAGEOUS laughter from high, college sophomore's)


The Onion was sadly falling into the lw useful useful idiot trap, but they at least came up with this gem.

http://www.theonion.com/tag/hillary-clinton

Clinton Already Working On Follow-Up Book Casting Blame For Failures Of First
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Sanders was a false hope. There was no way he was going to beat the Clinton machine within her own party. No way Jose. Everyone who thought he had a chance were emotionally bought into his campaign.

I think her analysis was pretty accurate about how he came up with other campaign topics besides for rich people suck


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well ****... get ready for about a 20min interview on how everyone but Hillary cost her the presidency. How evil, and despicable Trump & his supporters are, how he empowers the white supremacist.. blah, blah, ****ing blah...

Colbert has been getting less funny at an increasingly quick pace, and this might just be him stomping that gas pedal into overtime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom