- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 53,409
- Reaction score
- 31,475
- Location
- Northern California
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Ummm, the problem with this is:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...llary-clintons-server/?utm_term=.73dc014abdd4
a. The above quote was from WaPo and slanted in her favor. Other's citables indicate the number could be larger. Even so, this shows it was more than one document, and
Report: FBI pulls deleted emails from Hillary Clinton's server - CBS News
b. over 30,000 emails were allowed to be deleted and the disc was "scrubbed" to insure they could not be recovered by Clinton's legal team BEFORE the server was released to the FBI for forensic investigation.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulro...000-wiped-clean-clinton-e-mails/#3a0f0a029a67
Now you may not be aware, but evidence subpoenaed for a criminal investigation is not typically subject to modification. It is supposed to be seized and reviewed without alteration.
So the issue was about actual violations of federal secrecy law by an official of the U.S. Government (Hillary was Secretary of State at the time), and the possible destruction of evidence.
See the difference in the two situations? (Probably not) :coffeepap:
The old "But... but... Hillary!" defense.
:inandout: