- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I find it to be bull**** given the publication's history. It's whining about a subject a few years too late and when it's fully guilty of it.
See: Show us the birth certificate! - National Review
Now you're talking about the publication's "history." Thus far, you've provided a dubious interpretation of a single blog post (which you didn't even read in its entirety) in the 60-year history of the publication as your sole evidence, even in the face of the overt, plain editorial stance of the publication being exactly the opposite of what you claimed.
Let's see more, and specifics. Let's see the pattern and history you claim exists.