Watching CNN, Fox & MSNBC Simulataneously on the Comey Hearings

rhinefire · Jun 8, 2017

The tape at the bottom of the screen during the testimony today reflected the bias of the left and right associated with the networks today. The tape showed highlights of what Comey was saying and opposed to what he was saying about this being an American problem as opposed to a Dem. vs. Rep. thing the networks shrunk to their typical no-brain, one sided slop as expected. The world got a big laugh at America today.

Skeptic Bob · Jun 9, 2017

As tired as I am of all of this, the email server investigation and the Russia investigation have really shined a light on just how partisan media, politicians and private citizens can be. The parallels between many parts of the two investigations and how differently they have been judged by the same people have made it clear as day how bad it has gotten.

sKiTzo · Jun 10, 2017

rhinefire said:
The tape at the bottom of the screen during the testimony today reflected the bias of the left and right associated with the networks today. The tape showed highlights of what Comey was saying and opposed to what he was saying about this being an American problem as opposed to a Dem. vs. Rep. thing the networks shrunk to their typical no-brain, one sided slop as expected. The world got a big laugh at America today.

The whole entire thing is completely fabricated to begin with. Their plan of rigging and stealing the election was foiled, so why not go for broke and try to push this ridiculous and juvenile conspiracy theory that the Russians and Trump are in collusion and that's why he won. After all, with full control of the MSM they can create any false paradigm suited to their goals. Try to anyway - since most are privy now it's not working so well, is it?

As if the Russians had any means at their disposal anyway to be able to influence an American election. What could they hack that would make any difference? Certainly not the DNC email server. We already know that hack was courtesy of wikileaks via a DNC insider who didn't care for the mega-corruption that was going on. That DNC insider is now dead by gunshot. Go figure.

Comey was fired due to his either incompetence or corrupt nature that he revealed by his elephant in the room statement that he couldn't establish "intent" in Hillary's email scandal. Sorry Comey, but that's what happens when you drain the swamp.

RickJames3000 · Jun 10, 2017

sKiTzo said:
The whole entire thing is completely fabricated to begin with. Their plan of rigging and stealing the election was foiled, so why not go for broke and try to push this ridiculous and juvenile conspiracy theory that the Russians and Trump are in collusion and that's why he won. After all, with full control of the MSM they can create any false paradigm suited to their goals. Try to anyway - since most are privy now it's not working so well, is it?

As if the Russians had any means at their disposal anyway to be able to influence an American election. What could they hack that would make any difference? Certainly not the DNC email server. We already know that hack was courtesy of wikileaks via a DNC insider who didn't care for the mega-corruption that was going on. That DNC insider is now dead by gunshot. Go figure.

Comey was fired due to his either incompetence or corrupt nature that he revealed by his elephant in the room statement that he couldn't establish "intent" in Hillary's email scandal. Sorry Comey, but that's what happens when you drain the swamp.

"OMG BUT HILLARY!!!!" Weak.
Sad.

Apparently you didn't get the memo that using the "drain the swamp" slogan to defend Trump's corruption makes you look foolish.
You can come back and thank me when the epiphany finally hits you.

Tigerace117 · Jun 10, 2017

sKiTzo said:
The whole entire thing is completely fabricated to begin with. Their plan of rigging and stealing the election was foiled, so why not go for broke and try to push this ridiculous and juvenile conspiracy theory that the Russians and Trump are in collusion and that's why he won. After all, with full control of the MSM they can create any false paradigm suited to their goals. Try to anyway - since most are privy now it's not working so well, is it?

As if the Russians had any means at their disposal anyway to be able to influence an American election. What could they hack that would make any difference? Certainly not the DNC email server. We already know that hack was courtesy of wikileaks via a DNC insider who didn't care for the mega-corruption that was going on. That DNC insider is now dead by gunshot. Go figure.

Comey was fired due to his either incompetence or corrupt nature that he revealed by his elephant in the room statement that he couldn't establish "intent" in Hillary's email scandal. Sorry Comey, but that's what happens when you drain the swamp.

Coming from somebody who thinks NATO and Mossad conduct terrorism, you have no room to accuse anyone else of "juvenile" theories.

Media_Truth · Jun 10, 2017

sKiTzo said:
The whole entire thing is completely fabricated to begin with. Their plan of rigging and stealing the election was foiled, so why not go for broke and try to push this ridiculous and juvenile conspiracy theory that the Russians and Trump are in collusion and that's why he won. After all, with full control of the MSM they can create any false paradigm suited to their goals. Try to anyway - since most are privy now it's not working so well, is it?

As if the Russians had any means at their disposal anyway to be able to influence an American election. What could they hack that would make any difference? Certainly not the DNC email server. We already know that hack was courtesy of wikileaks via a DNC insider who didn't care for the mega-corruption that was going on. That DNC insider is now dead by gunshot. Go figure.

Comey was fired due to his either incompetence or corrupt nature that he revealed by his elephant in the room statement that he couldn't establish "intent" in Hillary's email scandal. Sorry Comey, but that's what happens when you drain the swamp.

A thread about media bias, and the second sentence shows an incredible reference to extraordinary media bias and lies.

Their plan of rigging and stealing the election was foiled, so why not go for broke

sKiTzo · Jun 11, 2017

RickJames3000 said:
"OMG BUT HILLARY!!!!" Weak.
Sad.

Apparently you didn't get the memo that using the "drain the swamp" slogan to defend Trump's corruption makes you look foolish.
You can come back and thank me when the epiphany finally hits you.

That's because there was no such memo. Draining the swamp is just that. It's a lot more than just a "slogan" - it's a breath of fresh air!

sKiTzo · Jun 11, 2017

Tigerace117 said:
Coming from somebody who thinks NATO and Mossad conduct terrorism, you have no room to accuse anyone else of "juvenile" theories.

Try not to show how intelligent and informed you are - you're making me feel so stupid!

sKiTzo · Jun 11, 2017

Media_Truth said:
A thread about media bias, and the second sentence shows an incredible reference to extraordinary media bias and lies.

Their plan of rigging and stealing the election was foiled, so why not go for broke

It's a fact, not bias, that voting machines "flipping" votes for Hillary were caught and corrected early on in the voting. That's a foiled attempt to rig and steal the election. In addition to that, we know from the leaked DNC emails (we knew anyway but the emails confirmed it) that Hillary stole the nomination from Sanders and shouldn't have been there anyway. No bias - just facts.

sKiTzo · Jun 11, 2017

Tigerace117 said:
Coming from somebody who thinks NATO and Mossad conduct terrorism, you have no room to accuse anyone else of "juvenile" theories.

Coming from someone who joined DP in March 2016 and has 10,619 posts. Hmmm...let's see...14 months with 2 days off per week...that comes out to about 53 posts PER DAY. 53!

DP community: Meet Tigerace117. A paid shill whose job it is to post views that are not his, but rather those of his employer.

Tigerace117 · Jun 11, 2017

sKiTzo said:
Try not to show how intelligent and informed you are - you're making me feel so stupid!

Clearly, since while you consistently claim that the "Jews" are behind terrorist attacks you didn't know anything about Gaddafi's long history of actually launching such attacks.

Tigerace117 · Jun 11, 2017

sKiTzo said:
Coming from someone who joined DP in March 2016 and has 10,619 posts. Hmmm...let's see...14 months with 2 days off per week...that comes out to about 53 posts PER DAY. 53!

DP community: Meet Tigerace117. A paid shill whose job it is to post views that are not his, but rather those of his employer.

Hate to break it to you buddy but all that proves is that I have way too much free time :mrgreen:

Don't think I'd be working two jobs this summer if people were paying me to post on the Internet.

Media_Truth · Jun 11, 2017

sKiTzo said:
It's a fact, not bias, that voting machines "flipping" votes for Hillary were caught and corrected early on in the voting. That's a foiled attempt to rig and steal the election. In addition to that, we know from the leaked DNC emails (we knew anyway but the emails confirmed it) that Hillary stole the nomination from Sanders and shouldn't have been there anyway. No bias - just facts.

Yes, "facts" with no backup whatsoever. If you want to talk about stealing elections, take a look at the Breitbart/FOX News targeting of ACORN, and the subsequent bankruptcy. Big dollars go into these Right Wing schemes, including the funding of Judicial Watch, the Heritage Foundation, the Heartland Institute, and the entire ALT Right family, funded by billionaire Oligarchs, and trillionaire corporate Plutarchs. These folks are laughing at you all the way to the bank.

sKiTzo · Jun 11, 2017

Tigerace117 said:
Hate to break it to you buddy but all that proves is that I have way too much free time :mrgreen:

Don't think I'd be working two jobs this summer if people were paying me to post on the Internet.

There's pa-len-ty to do in Chicago. You don't do 53 posts a day for your own leisure. Besides, your statements and tactics are all straight out of the shill handbook - EVERY time. Always chiming in on those touchy subjects and never budging - and most of all, always remaining very willingly ignorant of information that exists that contradict the false paradigm that your employers are so desperately clinging to and hiding the truth. I can always immediately recognize the worn out methods of a paid shill.

Tigerace117 · Jun 11, 2017

sKiTzo said:
There's pa-len-ty to do in Chicago. You don't do 53 posts a day for your own leisure. Besides, your statements and tactics are all straight out of the shill handbook - EVERY time. Always chiming in on those touchy subjects and never budging - and most of all, always remaining very willingly ignorant of information that exists that contradict the false paradigm that your employers are so desperately clinging to and hiding the truth. I can always immediately recognize the worn out methods of a paid shill.

No **** Sherlock. But I still have plenty of free time. Which I spend on here. Debating politics. As much as that offends your tender sensibilities. :roll:

You really aren't making your arguments look credible by flying off the handle and shrieking about how many posts I have by the way.

Oh, you mean the "person who has actually studied history, knows current events and isn't a CT loony" handbook. Noted.

Gee, politics are a touchy subject? No way :shock::roll:

You mean the bull**** that you swallow day in and day out, leading you to make blantantly false claims? Sorry bud; I'm not as gullible as you.

Congralutions. You've just conclusively proven that you are full of it. Nobody's paying me jack to post on here.

sKiTzo · Jun 11, 2017

Tigerace117 said:
You mean the bull**** that you swallow day in and day out, leading you to make blantantly false claims? Sorry bud; I'm not as gullible as you.

.

If you're a genuine poster, then why do you still strictly follow the MSM doctrine after seeing time and time again that they are engaged in such acts as staging fake news, pushing propaganda, and vainly attempting to create the false paradigm and climate suited to bring in the "new world order"? That's what this is all about and why you are being paid.

The MSM has blundered and been caught with their pants down more than enough times for us to see that they presently DO NOT exist to report the news as it happens, but to shape opinions and to "make happen" whatever they are told to make happen. You, the shill, are a component of that agenda - which is why you will never acknowledge everything I just said even though we have all beared witness to it all. Shills will continually deny that which has occurred, is tangible, and thus undeniable

Tigerace117 · Jun 11, 2017

sKiTzo said:
If you're a genuine poster, then why do you still strictly follow the MSM doctrine after seeing time and time again that they are engaged in such acts as staging fake news, pushing propaganda, and vainly attempting to create the false paradigm and climate suited to bring in the "new world order"? That's what this is all about and why you are being paid.

The MSM has blundered and been caught with their pants down more than enough times for us to see that they presently DO NOT exist to report the news as it happens, but to shape opinions and to "make happen" whatever they are told to make happen. You, the shill, are a component of that agenda - which is why you will never acknowledge everything I just said even though we have all beared witness to it all. Shills will continually deny that which has occurred, is tangible, and thus undeniable

Because I am not gullible to buy into the false information that your conspiracy theory sites spew. I study history, especially military history, so I know just how far your sources of information lie, distort and generally stretch the truth.

There is no "NWO". It's paranoid babble from people whose reliability rate is lowered than that of a stopped clock. And I'm not being paid, though it seems you are offering seeing how many times you keep coming back to this fantasy of yours.

Nobody "bears witness" to your claims because they don't exist. Frankly speaking, you are so desperate to push conspiracy bull**** that you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you on the ass.

sKiTzo · Jun 12, 2017

Tigerace117 said:
Because I am not gullible to buy into the false information that your conspiracy theory sites spew. I study history, especially military history, so I know just how far your sources of information lie, distort and generally stretch the truth.

There is no "NWO". It's paranoid babble from people whose reliability rate is lowered than that of a stopped clock. And I'm not being paid, though it seems you are offering seeing how many times you keep coming back to this fantasy of yours.

Nobody "bears witness" to your claims because they don't exist. Frankly speaking, you are so desperate to push conspiracy bull**** that you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you on the ass.

Like I said, steeeeraight out of the shill handbook utilizing the most cliche and tiresome shill tactic:

The "Mr. Magoo" - Put the blinders on to all instances of reality that don't line up with your propagandized narrative.. Pretend it never happened and that it is all just the "claims" of tin foil hat-wearing CTers.

In order for a debate to be productive, there is one unspoken rule that must be honored and adhered to. When a valid point is made and corroborated or backed with data, you have to either stand corrected or make a valid counterpoint that is also corroborated or backed with data. A shill won't budge and will NEVER stand corrected. I'll bet you can't post one link to any thread where you have stood corrected. 10,000+ posts and you won't be able to produce one!!!

Tigerace117 · Jun 12, 2017

sKiTzo said:
Like I said, steeeeraight out of the shill handbook utilizing the most cliche and tiresome shill tactic:

The "Mr. Magoo" - Put the blinders on to all instances of reality that don't line up with your propagandized narrative.. Pretend it never happened and that it is all just the "claims" of tin foil hat-wearing CTers.

In order for a debate to be productive, there is one unspoken rule that must be honored and adhered to. When a valid point is made and corroborated or backed with data, you have to either stand corrected or make a valid counterpoint that is also corroborated or backed with data. A shill won't budge and will NEVER stand corrected. I'll bet you can't post one link to any thread where you have stood corrected. 10,000+ posts and you won't be able to produce one!!!

And, of course you dip straight into yet more hysterical CT nonsense. It must be tiresome having to find ways to avoid acknowledging reality all day.

You mean ignoring the fantasies of CT loonies? Yes, I tend not to pay attention to their bull**** because it's always either A) them lying to promote their CT; B) them being too ignorant to understand why their CT is wrong or C) them exploiting tragedies to declare **** which never comes true--- for example, the despicable Alex Jones and his claim that Sandy Hook was a "false flag".

You CTers have literally never made a valid point. All of your **** falls into categories A, B or C.

Your "data" is always debunked, yet you keep coming back to it once you think people have forgotten that it was done.

You shrieking hysterically is rather amusing though.