• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Media Matters try to silence Seth Rich conspiracy

Sure, but that does not mean that Hannity should be the next one these idiot kids kick to the curb.

https://newrepublic.com/article/142880/fire-sean-hannity
No, he should be the next one kicked to the curb because he's an insufferable douchebag and a giant partisan hack.

And I have a right to demand that being a victim does not earn one extra rights in a land that strives for equality.

Who said anything about "extra rights?" Expressing disapproval isn't an extra right. We always had that. If enough Americans use their freedom of speech (and, more importantly, their freedom of the wallet) to make Hannity's advertisers take note and back away from the dickhead, that's just the free market and free speech in action.

Let me guess. You think Hannity has a right to have advertisers spend money on his hour of smugness.
 
The most trustworthy actor in this entire case is Assange. Not the leftist MSM or Fox or Hannity

I'm still waitin on Assanges evidence to back up the allegations of murder he's making.

But hey, I guess evidence is only for when Republicans get accused of stuff.
 
There is covering controversial cases and then is there is engaging in conspiracy peddling.

Seth Rich was likely murdered by some random thug. No controversy there

Yea... A random thug randomly shot someone and stole nothing
 
I'm still waitin on Assanges evidence to back up the allegations of murder he's making.

But hey, I guess evidence is only for when Republicans get accused of stuff.

I'm still looking for the MSM to give evidence of what happened.

We don't know yet. But we need to look into this from all perspectives
 
Why is this CT nonsense not in the CT section with all the other CT nonsense?
 
Yea... A random thug randomly shot someone and stole nothing

Once a gun goes off, most criminals try to get away from the scene as quickly as possible. To avoid, you know, getting caught.
 
No, he should be the next one kicked to the curb because he's an insufferable douchebag and a giant partisan hack.



Who said anything about "extra rights?" Expressing disapproval isn't an extra right. We always had that. If enough Americans use their freedom of speech (and, more importantly, their freedom of the wallet) to make Hannity's advertisers take note and back away from the dickhead, that's just the free market and free speech in action.

Let me guess. You think Hannity has a right to have advertisers spend money on his hour of smugness.

I was speaking to the suggestion that the parents having an opinion matters more than does mine or anyone elses, and I claim that the Corporate Class is making a huge mistake in how they now use their power to stifle controversial conversations, a problem that is getting worse and which is rooted in having most of the so-called journalists employeed by corporate outfits.

We desperately need to fix journalism, and yet almost no one is talking about it, hell, huge numbers of Americans either dont know that it is broken or dont care.

I blame the education system.
 
I'm still looking for the MSM to give evidence of what happened.

We don't know yet. But we need to look into this from all perspectives

What, you think they have some evidence they're hiding that the police don't know about?

How come Assange, such a trustworthy guy, doesn't have evidence?

I am looking at all perspectives. On the one hand, I have the opinion of the police officers who actually investigated the murder. On the other hand, I have "some dude in a different country says so."

Yeah, sorry. I'm not going to call the police a bunch of liars without evidence to support that. I'm sorry if that standard is not good enough.
 
Once a gun goes off, most criminals try to get away from the scene as quickly as possible. To avoid, you know, getting caught.

Most criminals don't just shoot random people in a situation where they're not likely to be able to rob someone.
Also if someone was there and the shooter had no time to rob him, then I'd expect we'd have witness's right?
 
Soros funded anti-free speech group Media Matters has gone on this ridiculous claim that Hannity needs to be boycotted over the whole

Since when is it unreasonable to suggest a conspiracy in such an insane case.
A guy leaks DNC secrets, gets murdered...

Nope... nothing to see here.

You're telling me we're going to silence someone for looking into an obviously suspicious case? We can't ask questions about Seth Rich?
Hannity: Media Matters Is Trying To Silence Me | Daily Wire

To me this is eveidence that there is something to the Seth Rich thing... Why else would MediaMatters be trying to silence him?

It's not about Hannity, it's about Media Matters trying to silence any coverage of what is obviously a fishy case.
I believe the DNC did kill Seth Rich and Soros is trying to cover up anyone who says so

FOX News DID silence that crappy conspiracy theory. LOL.
 
I was speaking to the suggestion that the parents having an opinion matters more than does mine or anyone elses, and I claim that the Corporate Class is making a huge mistake in how they now use their power to stifle controversial conversations, a problem that is getting worse and which is rooted in having most of the so-called journalists employeed by corporate outfits.

We desperately need to fix journalism, and yet almost no one is talking about it, hell, huge numbers of Americans either dont know that it is broken or dont care.

I blame the education system.

Stifle conversations about wild, unfounded conspiracy theories? Nobody is stifling that. They're merely choosing not to spend a bunch of money advertising on a show run by an idiot who believes these things.

I mean, would you want to advertise on a show run by a flat-earther? Would you spend your money on that?
 
What, you think they have some evidence they're hiding that the police don't know about?

How come Assange, such a trustworthy guy, doesn't have evidence?

I am looking at all perspectives. On the one hand, I have the opinion of the police officers who actually investigated the murder. On the other hand, I have "some dude in a different country says so."

Yeah, sorry. I'm not going to call the police a bunch of liars without evidence to support that. I'm sorry if that standard is not good enough.

I'm not calling the police liars either since they don't konw what happened yet.
And how could Assange have evidence? He doesn't konw who killed Seth. THe only claim being made by him is that Seth worked with him on the leaks. Disprove that...

I'm not saying we know what happened, but we need to look at this from every angle
 
Most criminals don't just shoot random people in a situation where they're not likely to be able to rob someone.
Also if someone was there and the shooter had no time to rob him, then I'd expect we'd have witness's right?

What gives you the idea they just randomly shot a person? What on earth gave you the idea they were "not likely to be able to rob someone?" Do you not realize you're inventing details of the shooting to fit a preconceived narrative?
 
Stifle conversations about wild, unfounded conspiracy theories? Nobody is stifling that. They're merely choosing not to spend a bunch of money advertising on a show run by an idiot who believes these things.

I mean, would you want to advertise on a show run by a flat-earther? Would you spend your money on that?

We DONT KNOW what happened.
You're just assuming that Seth had nothing to do with the DNC leaks, when Assange has no reason to lie
 
I'm not calling the police liars either since they don't konw what happened yet.
And how could Assange have evidence? He doesn't konw who killed Seth. THe only claim being made by him is that Seth worked with him on the leaks. Disprove that...

I'm not saying we know what happened, but we need to look at this from every angle

Assange has the burden of proving his allegations, I don't have the burden of disproving them.

I think an invisible crocodile killed Seth. Disprove that...
 
What gives you the idea they just randomly shot a person? What on earth gave you the idea they were "not likely to be able to rob someone?" Do you not realize you're inventing details of the shooting to fit a preconceived narrative?

All we know is that he was shot and not robbed.
Also... Assange claiming to be associated with Seth Rich is still more evidence than the left-wingers have for Trump's Russia connection... You have zero proof of that... I guess we should stop investigating then
 
We DONT KNOW what happened.
You're just assuming that Seth had nothing to do with the DNC leaks, when Assange has no reason to lie

I'm not assuming. I'm dismissing an extraordinary claim that has no evidence to support it. If evidence does arise, I shall reassess that situation.

But it wont.
 
All we know is that he was shot and not robbed.
Also... Assange claiming to be associated with Seth Rich is still more evidence than the left-wingers have for Trump's Russia connection... You have zero proof of that... I guess we should stop investigating then


Yeah, and the "random" and "not likely to be able to rob" parts? You made those up. Why did you do that?
 
Back
Top Bottom