• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News retracts story on Seth Rich murder investigation

I'd love to know anything related to Seth Rich being the leaker or being killed by the DNC/Clinton. That would be amazing info. That's why I looked into it when Fox news reported it and I also saw where the guy that made the claim retracted that he knows there's emails between Seth and wikileaks. I don't know why you think I have no interest in this story when I fully read the initial fox news report and fully read the retraction and all the reporting in between. What else am I supposed to do? What information am I not looking at that I should be looking at?

We'll see. It just smells.

A young guy in the DNC gets shot twice in the back in a "botched robbery", yet still has his wallet, then arrives at the hospital in relatively stable condition, only to die shortly after under hospital care.

Hannity had better have the goods, or he's toast. (I can't stand Hannity, but I'll listen to credible information if he has it.)
 
We'll see. It just smells.

A young guy in the DNC gets shot twice in the back in a "botched robbery", yet still has his wallet, then arrives at the hospital in relatively stable condition, only to die shortly after under hospital care.

Hannity had better have the goods, or he's toast. (I can't stand Hannity, but I'll listen to credible information if he has it.)

It only smells if you are conspiracy theory minded. I mean, the idea that Hillary had him shot and then somehow got someone at the hospital to finally kill him and no body release even the tiniest bit of info about it? That's insane and would require untold numbers of people being in on it.

People get mugged. Muggings go wrong sometimes. These things happen. Also, all of the people that know seth have expressed that he was not leaking info and that he was fully of the belief that Russia was trying to influence the election prior to his death.

If anyone provides any valid information then I'm all ears, but so far it's been nothing but lies and conspiracy theories.
 
We'll see. It just smells.

A young guy in the DNC gets shot twice in the back in a "botched robbery", yet still has his wallet, then arrives at the hospital in relatively stable condition, only to die shortly after under hospital care.

Hannity had better have the goods, or he's toast. (I can't stand Hannity, but I'll listen to credible information if he has it.)

As opposed to "master assassin leaves a man alive and responsive for the police to find."
 
It only smells if you are conspiracy theory minded. I mean, the idea that Hillary had him shot and then somehow got someone at the hospital to finally kill him and no body release even the tiniest bit of info about it? That's insane and would require untold numbers of people being in on it.

People get mugged. Muggings go wrong sometimes. These things happen. Also, all of the people that know seth have expressed that he was not leaking info and that he was fully of the belief that Russia was trying to influence the election prior to his death.

If anyone provides any valid information then I'm all ears, but so far it's been nothing but lies and conspiracy theories.

Sounds a lot like this Russian story, ya think?
 
Sounds a lot like this Russian story, ya think?

Collusion isn't even important part anymore. Now it's the obstruction of justice.
 
I'd love to know anything related to Seth Rich being the leaker or being killed by the DNC/Clinton.

That would be amazing info. That's why I looked into it when Fox news reported it and I also saw where the guy that made the claim retracted that he knows there's emails between Seth and wikileaks. I don't know why you think I have no interest in this story when I fully read the initial fox news report and fully read the retraction and all the reporting in between. What else am I supposed to do? What information am I not looking at that I should be looking at?


Maybe but you want to hear it in the trump hating liberal media which is not going to tell you about it
 
Maybe but you want to hear it in the trump hating liberal media which is not going to tell you about it

It's a dumb conspiracy theory that even Fox News has realized has nothing behind it.
 
It's a dumb conspiracy theory that even Fox News has realized has nothing behind it.

Fox realized that the washington establishment was not going to investigate so all they had to go on was "unnamed sources"

They are less liberal so less inclined to make up lies based on what a little birdie told them
 
We'll see.

Hannity claims that he's really close to a huge story on this.

He's going to be quiet right now, but he claims he's talking to Rich's parents on a daily basis. He's got a team of reporters putting the final pieces together.

His career depends on it. He'd better prove it.

Of course, CNN has zero proof on this Russian nonsense, but they aren't held to the same standard.

About as believable as the guy who said this:

"I have people that have been studying [Obama's birth certificate] and they cannot believe what they're finding..."​
 
Collusion isn't even important part anymore. Now it's the obstruction of justice.

Nobody has done anything that they aren't allowed to do. Keep digging up fake gold.
 
Fox realized that the washington establishment was not going to investigate so all they had to go on was "unnamed sources"

They are less liberal so less inclined to make up lies based on what a little birdie told them

I guess Hannity doesn't count, then.
 
Nobody has done anything that they aren't allowed to do. Keep digging up fake gold.

Obstruction of justice isn't allowed.
 
Nobody has done anything that they aren't allowed to do. Keep digging up fake gold.

how can you say that when you haven't been privy to the evidence that is drawing all these coming subpeonas?
 
Maybe but you want to hear it in the trump hating liberal media which is not going to tell you about it

I just told you that I read all of the fox news reporting on it. Where am I supposed to read about it? Who has verified information on it that hasn't been retracted?
 
I just told you that I read all of the fox news reporting on it. Where am I supposed to read about it? Who has verified information on it that hasn't been retracted?

You read Fox News and then attacked Fox News.
 
Funny how everybody dies the most incredible deaths around this clan.

Getting mugged in a high-crime city and dying in a plane crash are not "incredible."
 
Getting mugged in a high-crime city and dying in a plane crash are not "incredible."

What about committing suicide by shooting yourself in the back of the head?
 
Back
Top Bottom