• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view






So CNN has uncovered nothing whatsoever on this Russian collusion BS, and that is getting all their attention and effort. Meanwhile, there is clear evidence that Rice unmasked Trump personnel during the campaign in a surveillance operation, and CNN says they will not "aid and abet" this story any further.

CNN is pure, unadulterated propaganda posing as news.

Their impeachment plan is blowing up in their faces, and they're losing their wacky minds. LOL

That's CNN for ya.

Just sit back and enjoy it.

:mrgreen:
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

Saw a headline today: "Cnn had a problem and Donald Trump solved it". If Donald Trump didn't exist, CNN would have to create him.
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

We all know that Obama used the IRS to go after conservative groups for years
so it's not much of a leap for them to use other government agencies to go after
political opponents. CNN has gone insane over the Rice story. It never happened they
scream. They protest way to much.....
CNN has zero credibility ZERO!
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view






So CNN has uncovered nothing whatsoever on this Russian collusion BS, and that is getting all their attention and effort. Meanwhile, there is clear evidence that Rice unmasked Trump personnel during the campaign in a surveillance operation, and CNN says they will not "aid and abet" this story any further.

CNN is pure, unadulterated propaganda posing as news.

Their impeachment plan is blowing up in their faces, and they're losing their wacky minds. LOL

What did you expect from the Clinton News Network?
Honesty?
Truth?
Fact?

No, only ideology narrative, and they do so at their own peril.
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

Hardly.

You posed a similar one earlier I do believe. So what is good for the goose, right?

Where did I do this?
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view






So CNN has uncovered nothing whatsoever on this Russian collusion BS, and that is getting all their attention and effort. Meanwhile, there is clear evidence that Rice unmasked Trump personnel during the campaign in a surveillance operation, and CNN says they will not "aid and abet" this story any further.

CNN is pure, unadulterated propaganda posing as news.

Their impeachment plan is blowing up in their faces, and they're losing their wacky minds. LOL

How can anyone believe anything the C linton N ews N etwork has to report about anything ? Did they HAND Hillary debate questions a day before the debate ?
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

Where did I do this?
Horse pucky. The FBI is investigating Russian interference in your election. Question- Do you believe they actively interfered in the last Pres election? Yes or No- No need for para upon para of what, why and look over there.

Now if US Citizen(s) actively collaborated with the Russians, that will come out.
And if they did, they should rot in jail till they die- Agree or disagree??

Now, if you can ask those questions, why is it a trick question for me to ask mine?

Here is my question as a reminder:


And so...

Give us the deeper explanation, the persuasive evidence of some Trump collusion in either this instance or any other. That is all we are asking, as, at least from my perspective, I want who ever is breaking the law at this level to pay for it. But of course that includes illegal surveillance of an incoming opposing political party, don't you agree?

So?
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

Now, if you can ask those questions, why is it a trick question for me to ask mine?

Here is my question as a reminder:




So?

Your opinion is that illegal surveillance of Trumps campaign occurred???
If proven true, then any involved should face charges.
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

Your opinion is that illegal surveillance of Trumps campaign occurred???
If proven true, then any involved should face charges.
Listen, I think we can agree that this is a fluid situation, nothing yet too much set in stone as regards the facts.

Unfortunately.

But I think both sides can honestly push for, hell, lets at least start the autopsies on these two already dead horses we keep beating. No. 1 dead horse: Either there was collusion with the Russian govt or there wasn't. If there was then the possible allowances can be made in the surveillance of an incoming administration by the one going out... if team Trump was involved with bona fide collusion.

No collusion will require a much higher bar for the reasonings behind surveillance.

Since a minimum of July of 2016.

That is 8 months and nothing but these unmaskings and, lest we forget, a felony leak to show for it. Questionable: If somebody is risking going to jail for a leak that is of no consequence, that, I think we can all agree, would be dumb. What we can assume, with a lesser degree of confidence, is that nobody on the other team would be that... well, stupid, or maybe just slightly cocky, or maybe its just the norm we don't know about. But we have the paid lefty disrupters during the campaign to show the level of stupidity that some will go.

If it were just a little nudge in the direction of alerting the press of actual collusion and letting them do a Watergate type slow unraveling more private enterprise, rather than named govt sources, investigation with it played out on TV and print matter, well, I would consider that very slick, sophisticated to the downright diabolical maybe.

At the same time if it was to merely throw an added wrench in the firing on all cylinders Trump machine before election casting, causing doubt, especially when most thought Hill was set to be the sure fire winner...

Well then, that wrench it is about set to massively backfire because the left is no longer in control of the govt force mechanisms to unleash or hold back the dogs, whichever is the most appropriate and long term advantageous. Nor does the left any longer have control of either of the two houses of Congress, soon the Supreme Court. As we know, most of the nation is on the "other side". So this was, it is, to me, looking more and more to be, a pretty assumptive and brazen gamble... perhaps. If you do not see it that way, that is fine... we are both just gonna have to wait and see how the thing is gonna play out.

With Rice lying two weeks ago [ why would she feel she had to do that?] and now it changing from don't know what you are talking about, we absolutely were not surveilling to well, yes, but it was all legal...then you add Farkus trying to sing lead when she should had always previously only been backup, saying pretty potentially incriminating invitations to investigate her area, depending on viewpoint but appears pretty obligatory to me... what is gonna be the new plot twist, next we are going to hear what? Like watching a docudrama real time, a tele novela, just needs theme and mood music in the background.

Seems to me if you were gonna leak, though, risk maybe get caught, go to jail, it would be for the big cheese, the real goods on Trump, end up a hero, if you have the real goods. If after all that risk the only opposing fish you fried was Flynn, and that was not criminal but merely for integrity purposes at worse...will have resulted in becoming a very costly fishing expedition.

So, both no illegal surveillance, no collusion, yes collusion and yes surviellance, only one and not the other or neither. We do know that, by the leak, we have at least one criminal aspect to the two cases.

Entertaining yet potentially lethal, Trump is playing with these, the biggest of big boys with most the marbles... to lose. If they are not afraid to spy on an incoming President [ not yet proven beyond a shadow of doubt ], on the Senate [ proven ], individual private citizens [ proven ], Americans and planet Earthians [ proven ] ... what are they afraid of?
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

Listen, I think we can agree that this is a fluid situation, nothing yet too much set in stone as regards the facts.

Unfortunately.

But I think both sides can honestly push for, hell, lets at least start the autopsies on these two already dead horses we keep beating. No. 1 dead horse: Either there was collusion with the Russian govt or there wasn't. If there was then the possible allowances can be made in the surveillance of an incoming administration by the one going out... if team Trump was involved with bona fide collusion.

No collusion will require a much higher bar for the reasonings behind surveillance.

Since a minimum of July of 2016.

That is 8 months and nothing but these unmaskings and, lest we forget, a felony leak to show for it. Questionable: If somebody is risking going to jail for a leak that is of no consequence, that, I think we can all agree, would be dumb. What we can assume, with a lesser degree of confidence, is that nobody on the other team would be that... well, stupid, or maybe just slightly cocky, or maybe its just the norm we don't know about. But we have the paid lefty disrupters during the campaign to show the level of stupidity that some will go.

If it were just a little nudge in the direction of alerting the press of actual collusion and letting them do a Watergate type slow unraveling more private enterprise, rather than named govt sources, investigation with it played out on TV and print matter, well, I would consider that very slick, sophisticated to the downright diabolical maybe.

At the same time if it was to merely throw an added wrench in the firing on all cylinders Trump machine before election casting, causing doubt, especially when most thought Hill was set to be the sure fire winner...

Well then, that wrench it is about set to massively backfire because the left is no longer in control of the govt force mechanisms to unleash or hold back the dogs, whichever is the most appropriate and long term advantageous. Nor does the left any longer have control of either of the two houses of Congress, soon the Supreme Court. As we know, most of the nation is on the "other side". So this was, it is, to me, looking more and more to be, a pretty assumptive and brazen gamble... perhaps. If you do not see it that way, that is fine... we are both just gonna have to wait and see how the thing is gonna play out.

With Rice lying two weeks ago [ why would she feel she had to do that?] and now it changing from don't know what you are talking about, we absolutely were not surveilling to well, yes, but it was all legal...then you add Farkus trying to sing lead when she should had always previously only been backup, saying pretty potentially incriminating invitations to investigate her area, depending on viewpoint but appears pretty obligatory to me... what is gonna be the new plot twist, next we are going to hear what? Like watching a docudrama real time, a tele novela, just needs theme and mood music in the background.

Seems to me if you were gonna leak, though, risk maybe get caught, go to jail, it would be for the big cheese, the real goods on Trump, end up a hero, if you have the real goods. If after all that risk the only opposing fish you fried was Flynn, and that was not criminal but merely for integrity purposes at worse...will have resulted in becoming a very costly fishing expedition.

So, both no illegal surveillance, no collusion, yes collusion and yes surviellance, only one and not the other or neither. We do know that, by the leak, we have at least one criminal aspect to the two cases.

Entertaining yet potentially lethal, Trump is playing with these, the biggest of big boys with most the marbles... to lose. If they are not afraid to spy on an incoming President [ not yet proven beyond a shadow of doubt ], on the Senate [ proven ], individual private citizens [ proven ], Americans and planet Earthians [ proven ] ... what are they afraid of?

I have this bookmarked to reply to.
Long posts and some time is needed to compile a decent reply.
But yes I will reply.
 
Re: CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Sto

I have this bookmarked to reply to.
Long posts and some time is needed to compile a decent reply.
But yes I will reply.
Its cool.

Many times I am just laying it out for myself as well to see what the mechanics of the problems are and people take apart some things and I have to go back and do research to figure it out better. We probably won't know anything for sure for a while anyhow.
 
Back
Top Bottom