• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Bill O'Reilly Scandal

Parrish said:
Perhaps his next book should be Killing Fox.
Click to expand...


:lol: :lol: :lol:


th
 
I don't know/care if the allegations are true..

I have not heard any real details of the allegations, but I do know this:

In the workplace, It can be sexual harassment if you do the following:

Tell a co worker,, That blouse looks great on you.. ( you must say, "you look very professional today" )
Tell a co worker,, You smell good.. Referring to perfume/cologne.. ( i don't know what the PC verbiage is for this)
along with a lot of other things,, You have nice legs, You look beautiful,, Can we have dinner sometime etc.. etc..

Of course a lot of these just depends on whom your saying it to and the size of your check book!!

djl
 
O'Reilly has the highest rated cable news program for many years and more to come. I switch around almost every night and watch msnbc, cnn, fnc etc. and find fox the most informative of any, Fox covers stories that the other networks don't even mention and their commentators (especially on msnbc and cnn) are the most biased. Rachael Maddow, Mathews and Hayes on msnbc are the worst not to mention the looney toon Lemon from cnn. All they want is Trump to fail at anything he tries to do. When are all the snowflakes going to realize that the better the President does the better off the nation is. When Obama was elected I was disappointed but at the same time hoped he would do a good job which he most certainly did not and screwed up the economy leaving a debt of 20 trillion. He also had no balls dealing with Iran and lied about Bengasi, the IRS etc, and gave little or no support to the military and law enforcement. Didn't care much for either trump or Hillary but thankfully Trump won.
 
ModerateGOP said:
He tried to explain it by saying he's rich, that's why. All these women are similar in looks even down to the face. You can't tell me they are doing this for money. O'Reilly is a sleaze ball just ask his wife. She went through the same thing. He's a predator and should be fired. If he was anybody else he would have been, but now it looks like he will be anyway.
Click to expand...

I'm sure he's rich, but so is Sean Hannity. Hannity has female guests on as well. Perhaps Hannity's just really sneaky about his harassing. More likely, there's something to the accusations against Bill-O.
 
Middleground said:
Says a lot about Fox viewers, don't you think?
Click to expand...

According to Forbes, Fox News viewers continue to be the most uninformed folks:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/...c-look-into-the-fox-news-effect/#1b40416b12ab

The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.
Click to expand...
 
jime122 said:
O'Reilly has the highest rated cable news program for many years and more to come. I switch around almost every night and watch msnbc, cnn, fnc etc. and find fox the most informative of any, Fox covers stories that the other networks don't even mention and their commentators (especially on msnbc and cnn) are the most biased. .
Click to expand...

Yeah, no other News Networks cover the 300 lawsuits that Judicial Watch processed against Obama. That's about one every 8 days.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0

Judicial Watch’s strategy is simple: Carpet-bomb the federal courts with Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. A vast majority are dismissed.

Suing the government, repeatedly, is an expensive proposition; Judicial Watch has an annual budget of about $35 million that pays for close to 50 employees — a mix of lawyers, investigators and fund-raisers.

Litigiousness is in the organization’s DNA: Its founder, Larry Klayman, once sued his mother.

And the pending federal action against Trump University for defrauding students? Mr. Fitton, whose organization has filed about 300 lawsuits against the Obama administration, described it as “ambulance chasing.”

Critics accuse it of weaponizing the Freedom of Information Act for political purposes. They argue that its unending barrage of lawsuits does more harm than good by draining federal resources, tying up the courts and wasting public servants’ time.

The Oligarchs of the RIGHT finance all these lawsuits. FOX picks them up as headline news. And the FOX adherents vote in the Oligarch's pro-wealthy policies.
 
Media_Truth said:
Yeah, no other News Networks cover the 300 lawsuits that Judicial Watch processed against Obama. That's about one every 8 days.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0

Judicial Watch’s strategy is simple: Carpet-bomb the federal courts with Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. A vast majority are dismissed.

Suing the government, repeatedly, is an expensive proposition; Judicial Watch has an annual budget of about $35 million that pays for close to 50 employees — a mix of lawyers, investigators and fund-raisers.

Litigiousness is in the organization’s DNA: Its founder, Larry Klayman, once sued his mother.

And the pending federal action against Trump University for defrauding students? Mr. Fitton, whose organization has filed about 300 lawsuits against the Obama administration, described it as “ambulance chasing.”

Critics accuse it of weaponizing the Freedom of Information Act for political purposes. They argue that its unending barrage of lawsuits does more harm than good by draining federal resources, tying up the courts and wasting public servants’ time.

The Oligarchs of the RIGHT finance all these lawsuits. FOX picks them up as headline news. And the FOX adherents vote in the Oligarch's pro-wealthy policies.
Click to expand...

All targets of FOIA actions believe the law has been weaponized against them. That's because it has been -- that's the point of FOIA.
 
Jack Hays said:
All targets of FOIA actions believe the law has been weaponized against them. That's because it has been -- that's the point of FOIA.
Click to expand...

Certainly a true statement. It just so happens that the targets of FOIA actions have been predominantly Democrats, with the Judicial Watch deep pockets initiating the lawsuits. It's a game of public opinion to the biggest spender.
 
Media_Truth said:
Certainly a true statement. It just so happens that the targets of FOIA actions have been predominantly Democrats, with the Judicial Watch deep pockets initiating the lawsuits. It's a game of public opinion to the biggest spender.
Click to expand...

That's because Dems were in power 2009-2017. The opposition always makes more use of FOIA. Dems have their own deep pockets.
 
Jack Hays said:
That's because Dems were in power 2009-2017. The opposition always makes more use of FOIA. Dems have their own deep pockets.
Click to expand...

300 lawsuits against Obama by Judicial Watch. Show me some Dem deep pockets that can rival that, without changing the subject.
 
Media_Truth said:
300 lawsuits against Obama by Judicial Watch. Show me some Dem deep pockets that can rival that, without changing the subject.
Click to expand...

The same Dem deep pockets who gave HRC such a whopping financial edge over DJT. The Dems are the party of big money these days.
 
jime122 said:
O'Reilly has the highest rated cable news program for many years and more to come. I switch around almost every night and watch msnbc, cnn, fnc etc. and find fox the most informative of any, Fox covers stories that the other networks don't even mention and their commentators (especially on msnbc and cnn) are the most biased. Rachael Maddow, Mathews and Hayes on msnbc are the worst not to mention the looney toon Lemon from cnn. All they want is Trump to fail at anything he tries to do. When are all the snowflakes going to realize that the better the President does the better off the nation is. When Obama was elected I was disappointed but at the same time hoped he would do a good job which he most certainly did not and screwed up the economy leaving a debt of 20 trillion. He also had no balls dealing with Iran and lied about Bengasi, the IRS etc, and gave little or no support to the military and law enforcement. Didn't care much for either trump or Hillary but thankfully Trump won.
Click to expand...

when people use the words 'libtard' or 'cuck' or 'snowflake' in a political post I just automatically assume they are members of the Alt-Reich and therefore not worth my time. Nothing in your post would make me alter that opinion. Enjoy your Fascist President.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom