• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is the point of PBS and NPR?

When you put it that way, no. But the role of the government is to get the best bang out of a tax buck with the taxpayers benefit in mind, and PSB has proven to be a worthy investment. For the cost of chump change found in the seat cushions of the tax budget couch, it's worth has proven tenfold. Makes me wonder why it seems only conservatives have issue with PBS. Why is it? Is it a talking point? Is it because the news programming is not biased like FoxNews? I simply don't get it.

It isn't complicated. We have too much government. It isn't even all about money. It is about trying to manage a bloated overreaching government. I think Canada has too much government as well. But perhaps your government is more competent and less corrupt than ours. I don't know.
 
Then the government shouldn't run public museums or parks. PBS is a public good that provides educational content for free for everyone. You can sit your toddler to your tween in front of PBS Kids and know they will see high quality content without being indoctrinated with consumerism.

Correct. Federal government should not. If you want those things in state and local government, that's fine. Then it is influenced by voters who use the services.
 
Except one of the main reasons I watch PBS is because they don't constantly run adds.

If the programming isn't worth watching with the hassle of ads then it shouldn't have been supported in the first place.
 
It isn't complicated. We have too much government. It isn't even all about money. It is about trying to manage a bloated overreaching government. I think Canada has too much government as well. But perhaps your government is more competent and less corrupt than ours. I don't know.

We see things much differently. To me, government overreach is necessary.
 
We see things much differently. To me, government overreach is necessary.

Perhaps, if you have a government free of corruption and incompetence. I'll place my faith in the private sector.
 
Perhaps, if you have a government free of corruption and incompetence. I'll place my faith in the private sector.

Think the private sector is free of corruption? All they care about is bottom line.
 
Think the private sector is free of corruption? All they care about is bottom line.

No, I just think it is less corrupt than government. All it cares about is power and control.
 
According to NPR, here is where their funding comes from.

Admittedly, 14% isn't much, seems like they could close that gap with a bit more fund raising.

On the flip side, some of the expenses they incur.

From another source:


But the question still stands. Why does the government and tax payers, need to support this?

What is it about those local broadcasters that's so important?

Why not?

Take a look at all the other stuff our tax dollars finance, draw up a list and ask the very same question for each of them.
 
Why not?

Take a look at all the other stuff our tax dollars finance, draw up a list and ask the very same question for each of them.

Agreed. That very much needs to happen. Perhaps this administration?

Given the screams from all sides as to the proposed budget from the White House, must be something to that.
 
Back
Top Bottom