• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jesse Watters Does Hard Hitting Interview With Trump

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
There's fair, there's bias, there's nauseating, and then there's praise. Can you guess which interview this one is? Seriously though, all those who are against media bias, is this crap what you'd rather have?

A few other responses, condensed:

Barack Obama? “Very nice to me personally but his people haven’t been nice.”

The Wall? “Some great designs coming in.”

Kellyanne Conway: “Very nice woman.”

Hillary Clinton: “Disappointed.”

Vladimir Putin: “I don’t know him but certainly he is a tough cookie.”

Elizabeth Warren: “Craziness and anger. Pocahontas would not be proud of her.”

Bill O’Reilly: “Don’t kid yourself, he’s a talented guy.”

Jesse Watters: “Tremendous future, tremendous potential…And honestly you’ve been so nice to me that this is why I turned down the biggest shows on television and here I am, Watters’ World.

Donald Trump Calls Tax Returns Sacred & Vladimir Putin “Tough Cookie” | Deadline

No Donald, the reason you are on Watters world is because Watters doesn't have a backbone and won't ask you to comment on the tax returns like everyone else. At least Obama waited awhile until he started going on shows like this.
 
I didn't watch Trump's interview with Jesse Watters. Why does this interview bug you so much?
 
I didn't watch Trump's interview with Jesse Watters. Why does this interview bug you so much?

Because this other than Fox & Friends and perhaps Tucker Carlson is the easiest cop-out ever.
 
You do understand that Watters is not a real reporter, right? He more like Jimmy Kimmel's sidekick, Guillermo, who does interviews. Would you criticize his interviews?
 
There's fair, there's bias, there's nauseating, and then there's praise. Can you guess which interview this one is? Seriously though, all those who are against media bias, is this crap what you'd rather have?



Donald Trump Calls Tax Returns Sacred & Vladimir Putin “Tough Cookie” | Deadline

No Donald, the reason you are on Watters world is because Watters doesn't have a backbone and won't ask you to comment on the tax returns like everyone else. At least Obama waited awhile until he started going on shows like this.

Jesse Waters is nowhere near being a journalist. He's an arrogant spin off of Bill O'Reilly. Saying Jesse Waters is a journalist is like saying Rachel Maddow is a journalist, or Al Sharpton is a Reverend.
 
There's fair, there's bias, there's nauseating, and then there's praise. Can you guess which interview this one is? Seriously though, all those who are against media bias, is this crap what you'd rather have?



Donald Trump Calls Tax Returns Sacred & Vladimir Putin “Tough Cookie” | Deadline

No Donald, the reason you are on Watters world is because Watters doesn't have a backbone and won't ask you to comment on the tax returns like everyone else. At least Obama waited awhile until he started going on shows like this.

This is more like a free association activity one might do with a psychoanalyst, rather than a journalistic piece.
 
You do understand that Watters is not a real reporter, right? He more like Jimmy Kimmel's sidekick, Guillermo, who does interviews. Would you criticize his interviews?

I would if after all the people who Trump could go to he chose Guillermo.
 
Instead of describing himself as a humorist, maybe Watters should make an effort to be funny?:shrug:
That would make it more clear.

Evidently he is funny to some people - his audience and fans - or he wouldn't have an ongoing gig at Fox. But, that doesn't mean that you or I have to find him funny (I don't by the way) for him to call himself a humorist and still be accurate.
 
Instead of describing himself as a humorist, maybe Watters should make an effort to be funny?:shrug:
That would make it more clear.

Watters and his "world" is an acquired taste.
 
Evidently he is funny to some people - his audience and fans - or he wouldn't have an ongoing gig at Fox. But, that doesn't mean that you or I have to find him funny (I don't by the way) for him to call himself a humorist and still be accurate.

I hear ya.
It's true that there are plenty of unintentionally funny "journalists" working at FOX... so why couldn't there be failed intentional humorists as well?
I was just suggesting a better way forward for Watters.
 
I hear ya.
It's true that there are plenty of unintentionally funny "journalists" working at FOX... so why couldn't there be failed intentional humorists as well?
I was just suggesting a better way forward for Watters.

He's so far down my list of crap to care about, that I can't even try to care even if I wanted to.
 
Yet, Obama going on Oprah was great, right?

Watters is a bit guy. Not a journalist. Just like Oprah.
 
I did not see it advertised as a hard hitting interview so I categorized it for what it was..a bit piece.

Now the madcow hyping, tweeting, and advertising for her piece was wayyy over the top and a swan dive into the fake news pool.

Cobert on Maddow

[video]http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2017/03/16/5267558656658422409/640x360_MP4_5267558656658422409.mp4[/video]
 
Back
Top Bottom