• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dear Mainstream Media: YOU Made DeepStateGate Happen

Can you quote the NYT article where it says that...I can't see it unless you quote it because I've used up my ten free visits for this month. lol

You can visit as often as you like, but only 10 times can you access articles for free.
 
You can visit as often as you like, but only 10 times can you access articles for free.

I've already used up my ten times for the month....thats why I asked him to quote the article.
 
Can you quote the NYT article where it says that...I can't see it unless you quote it because I've used up my ten free visits for this month. lol

Gladly...

The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html
 
Huh? What's the CT that you're claiming? All I see is that that the media, rightly so, is implicated in contributing to the claims of wiretapping. They were the ones reporting on all this stuff to begin with.

People are weird.

Do you think we should "Judy Miller" the reporters who made their reports, based on the leaks? Should the DOJ put them in jail and make them reveal their sources?
 
Last edited:
We have a POTUS with no impulse control or discretion where Twitter is involved and somehow this is a MSM issue?

Seriously, a current POTUS claiming a former POTUS is guilty of a serious crime and you don't have the balls to back up your Tweet?
 
trump proved he was a sniveling coward BEGINNING 50 years ago .
 
Do you think we should "Judy Miller" the reporters who made their reports, based on the leaks? Should the DOJ put them in jail and make them reveal their sources?

That would be way to authoritarian and statist for me. The problem isn't that unnamed sources are being used, it's that it seems that unnamed sources has completely taken over, leaving nothing of solid credibility. My preferred solution is that the news agencies would show a little bit more integrity and have higher standards set by themselves, instead of basically being gossip whores to score partisan points.
 
Gladly...

The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/1...stigation.html

I'd call that a smoking gun. Why did it go to the White House. I'd think an honest operation like obama wouldn't want to get within ten feet of it. So someone has a transcript, and someone has proof of delivery.
 
Do you think we should "Judy Miller" the reporters who made their reports, based on the leaks? Should the DOJ put them in jail and make them reveal their sources?

We should investigate them for Espionage Act violations. Obama did it, so it's ok.
 
Back
Top Bottom