- Joined
- Mar 20, 2012
- Messages
- 22,703
- Reaction score
- 9,469
- Location
- okla-freakin-homa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Unnamed sources are dismissed out of hand.
Like 'Deepthroat' during Watergate????
Unnamed sources are dismissed out of hand.
A lot of candidates said once the borders were secure they would decide such things. Trump was one of them.
This is one of those times where it's not about what he said, but the way in which his people said what he was going to say and then it turns out they lied about it to mislead not just the media, but anybody watching or searching for those reports.
Like 'Deepthroat' during Watergate????
Are you seriously comparing the Watergate era, with today's practice of citing "unnamed sources" 10 times per day these days? Ooooo-kay. :screwy
Are you seriously dismissing unnamed sources because today there are hundreds more news outlets, most of whom cite THE SAME unnamed source???
I don't recall you giving any time frame to your 'dismissal'. Fact is the rabid right LOVED the leaks and unnamed sources when it was against a Dem and now of course hate them when The Donald and his train wreck crew are the target... eace
Yes, I am dismissing the media equivalent of "the boy who cried wolf" when it's a daily occurrence, and nothing ever comes of it. How often does the MSM have to be caught in a lie before idiot libs wake up? Oh and, where was your support for the leaks against Dems (which of course is comparing apples to oranges)?