• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill O'Reilly Says Electoral College Protects the "White Establishment"

Hatuey said:
Excuse me sir, you still haven't explained why I should stop to read about your opinions on the subject. Clearly - what really needs to be discussed here is Bill O'Reilly's admission that minorities are out to get white people who are now under by... well... 3 million votes as he so eloquently put it.

Anywho, how interesting that Bill O'Reilly is discussing the 'white establishment' that we've all been told doesn't exist... but will be shut down by an attack on white precincts.

I wonder how he feels about Breitbart.
Click to expand...
Well I'll say this! You are the third poster at DP to ask me why you should be bothered to respond to a question asked about your self stated "opinion" on a political debate board where this would seem to be the obvious manner of communication. And you really seem to want to be taken seriously, just like the other two. How original of you. Guess what? The inability to answer a straight forward question is not a plus for your so called opinion in a forum like this.

Also? I did not give you my opinion. I asked you a question about yours. So I asked, you ran to cliche. When an honest and simple no would have sufficed. My "opinion" is that you had no familiarity with the actual topic you were pontificating about. What a merry ho-ho.:yawn:
 
Last edited:
Kobie said:
Which end of the political spectrum calls those on the left freeloaders, takers, and America-haters; claims homosexuals are cramming some mythical "gay agenda" down their throats; and other acts of nonsense? THAT'S not divisive?
Click to expand...

Which end of the spectrum calls everyone who dares disagree with them stupid, or liars?
 
eohrnberger said:
Which end of the political spectrum keeps accusing others of racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, misogyny, et. al. without basis?
All identify politics and divisiveness. This is a matter fact and a matter of record.
Click to expand...

Kobie said:
Which end of the political spectrum calls those on the left freeloaders, takers, and America-haters; claims homosexuals are cramming some mythical "gay agenda" down their throats; and other acts of nonsense? THAT'S not divisive?
Click to expand...

Kobie said:
Shorter eohrnberger: Sure, we do it, but it's okay when we do it.
Click to expand...

Hardly.

Baseless claims of racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, misogyny, et. al. are accusations designed and intended to discredit, destroy, excoriate, to silence someone who disagrees with the leftist's agenda.

Using freeloaders, takers, and America-haters; claims homosexuals are cramming some mythical "gay agenda", are not, and are far more accurate descriptions of those involved.

Not nearly the same thing.
 
eohrnberger said:
Hardly.

Baseless claims of racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, misogyny, et. al. are accusations designed and intended to discredit, destroy, excoriate, to silence someone who disagrees with the leftist's agenda.

Using freeloaders, takers, and America-haters; claims homosexuals are cramming some mythical "gay agenda", are not, and are far more accurate descriptions of those involved.

Not nearly the same thing.
Click to expand...

Shorter eohrnberger: it's only baseless when liberals do it
 
Kobie said:
Shorter eohrnberger: it's only baseless when liberals do it
Click to expand...

Accusing someone of racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, misogyny, et. al. in the attempt to destroy someone is most certainly not the same as accusing someone of freeloading, being a taker, and a America-hater.

Fallacious equivalency.
 
Sardonicus said:
Well I'll say this!
Click to expand...

I really don't care what you have to say. You really should have gotten the point earlier.

Anywho, that white establishment O'Reilly is talking about - do you agree it is protected by the Electoral College?

Or?
 
Hatuey said:
I really don't care what you have to say. You really should have gotten the point earlier.

Anywho, that white establishment O'Reilly is talking about - do you agree it is protected by the Electoral College?

Or?
Click to expand...
O'Reilly said the left sees a white establishment/white privilege he did not say there is such a thing, and no on the EC
 
Master PO said:
O'Reilly said the left sees a white establishment/white privilege he did not say there is such a thing, and no on the EC
Click to expand...

BillO_ReilyWhite_qtp_848x480_839404611532.jpg


Please show me where O'Reilly says 'that the left sees a white establishment'.

I can wait.
 
Last edited:
Kobie said:
Are you claiming that it's ONLY liberals who claim their opponents are stupid, or liars?
Click to expand...

Liberals do it waaaaay more than Conservatives. You do it regularly. You'll do it in your response to this post. You people can't help yourselves, because you have no other way to defend your agenda.
 
apdst said:
Liberals do it waaaaay more than Conservatives. You do it regularly. You'll do it in your response to this post. You people can't help yourselves, because you have no other way to defend your agenda.
Click to expand...

And thus you attempt to make your argument a self-fulfilling one. For if I point out that your assessment is baseless and incorrect, you'll just try to say such a claim proves you right. Not playing your little games today, pal. I'm headed to a football game.
 
Kobie said:
And thus you attempt to make your argument a self-fulfilling one. For if I point out that your assessment is baseless and incorrect, you'll just try to say such a claim proves you right. Not playing your little games today, pal. I'm headed to a football game.
Click to expand...

Of course it's self fulfilling. You people guarantee that. It's all you have.
 
Master PO said:
already posted once: 2:23


Bill O'Reilly - "the Left Sees white privledge as being an oppressive force, that must be done away with"

your wait is over
Click to expand...

I hope you will be honest enough to admit that white privilege and white establishment aren't the same words. Right?

:lol:
 
Hatuey said:
I hope you will be honest enough to admit that white privilege and white establishment aren't the same words. Right?

:lol:
Click to expand...

i hope you will see my post


Master PO said:
O'Reilly said the left sees a white establishment/white privilege he did not say there is such a thing, and no on the EC
Click to expand...

o really intermixed the terms, and you didn't wait long.
 
Hatuey said:
I really don't care what you have to say. You really should have gotten the point earlier.

Anywho, that white establishment O'Reilly is talking about - do you agree it is protected by the Electoral College?

Or?
Click to expand...
Just like the other two posters that could not answer a simple question (albeit one that the answer to is obvious: no you did not watch the episode in question. You outsourced your so called *thinking* to the CNN pundits that got all of this just as purposefully wrong you have) when you are not offering up your pathetic excuses and diversions? You want to toss out questions instead of honest debate. OK. Good to know.

Naturally you can now refer to your own inane obfuscations for my answer to your oh so stupid "question". :2razz:
 
Sardonicus said:
Just
Click to expand...

Dude, seriously didn't read anything you post past the first word because you won't discuss the white establishment that O'Reilly says is protected by the EC.
 
Master PO said:
i hope you will see my post

o really intermixed the terms, and you didn't wait long.
Click to expand...

So then we agree that O'Reilly is talking about white privilege... not a white establishment... which he then goes on to discuss is protected by the EC.

I don't think you're being too consistent here.
 
Hatuey said:
So then we agree that O'Reilly is talking about white privilege... not a white establishment... which he then goes on to discuss is protected by the EC.

I don't think you're being too consistent here.
Click to expand...

i dont think you read my post and you are not going to
 
Hatuey said:
Dude, seriously didn't read anything you post past the first word because you won't discuss the white establishment that O'Reilly says is protected by the EC.
Click to expand...
Dude, seriously you've tried selectively quoting but editing away my comments in order to post juvenile bromides. Dude, you've tried the sad little cliche 'why should I respond to a challenge on a debate board' idiocy that is as juvenile as the editing and bromide offers were. And you've twice now proudly bragged that you have excuses for why you don't bother reading past anything that challenges you. We get it, you have nothing intelligent to say. Like I said before and you appear intent on illustrating, you were simply regurgitating the so called thinking of the panel of pundits at CNN who also managed to not do too much critical thinking about this story of theirs. As the old saying goes, crap in? Crap out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom