I think you meant "scared."
And he should be. Don't you remember the immediate sobering effect the Presidency had on Obama?
From David French at
NRO:
My more pressing concern is the absurd notion that Hillary is more legitimate because she won a game that neither candidate was playing. Both sides campaigned, strategized, and spent money to win not a popular-vote plurality but 270 electoral votes. If Hillary had reached 270 and without winning the popular vote, not a single left-wing protester would be demanding that electors switch their votes to Trump.
...Here’s a fact: We don’t know who would have won the 2016 (or 2000) presidential races if the president was elected by popular vote because the race would have been run completely differently.
Page not found | National Review
I don't understand what NRO's continuing problem is, but the article title is "Hillary’s Popular-Vote Win Is (Mostly) Meaningless."