• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barack Obama SCREAMS at Crowd Disrespecting Trump Supporter

Top Cat said:
What will history say about you?
Click to expand...

That he was the best of the best, the greatest of the greatest, and just an all around swell guy.

:lol:
 
Paperview said:
^ Creating new Democrat voters, one post at a time.

Thanks for your efforts. *hat tip*
Click to expand...

That must be why Mr. Trump is looking to double his black voters over Romney.
 
Gina said:
Lip service. That's all.
Click to expand...

I am sorry Obama didn't rise to the standard of offering to pay the legal fees of anyone who would "knock the crap out" of him.
 
Paperview said:
lol

Yer funny.

Hey, any chance you may be able to get back to me on that Hatch Act thing?
Click to expand...

How about you prove that a Federal judge can arbitrarily interfere with an election, as you've claimed.
 
apdst said:
How about you prove that a Federal judge can arbitrarily interfere with an election, as you've claimed.
Click to expand...

You (wrongly) claimed the federal judge was violating the Hatch Act. That was *your* claim. How about you prove that?

I noticed you abandoned ship when asked for actual proof.
 
apdst said:
How about you prove that a Federal judge can arbitrarily interfere with an election, as you've claimed.
Click to expand...

Paperview said:
You (wrongly) claimed the federal judge was violating the Hatch Act. That was *your* claim. How about you prove that?

I noticed you abandoned ship when asked for actual proof.
Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:
Let's not guys. That's not the topic of this thread. Thanks.
 
coldjoint said:
History, more than ever, depends on who writes it. It no longer is factual or accurate.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what you're talking about, but are you saying that - for instance - history books are claiming that Bill Clinton was never actually impeached or lied under oath? In other words, the job of historian no longer exists and our history books are written by partisan lobbyists? Can you give me an example of something considered recent history (confined to American history I suppose) that you would consider inaccurate or false? You may be saying "history is written by the victor," which is fine and I take very little issue with. I just have a feeling this is another "conservatives are victims of progressives" post. If not, my apologies.
 
You call that screaming?

LOL
 
Northern Light said:
You call that screaming?

LOL
Click to expand...

And his "screaming" wasn't even directed at the Trump supporter, although I'm sure there are Trump supporters in this very thread still convinced otherwise because King Trump decreed it so.
 
I didn't vote for Obama and I am not a fan of his presidency. But this was a classy move. From time to time politicians on both sides correct their supporters when their supporters are being a-holes. Obama did it here. McCain did when one of his supporters spewed conspiracy nonsense about Obama. It is always a classy move. I can't recall either Trump or Hillary ever doing this. Maybe they have and I missed it.
 
Casper said:
Obama: Class

Trump: Lack-of-Class
Click to expand...

Rofl...the false comparison is stupid. Give me a call when the stage is rushed or when riot police are needed to hold back a giant violent mob from storming the event, over, and over, and over again. Give me a call when that isn't even enough and the event has to be canceled due to security concerns.

One guy protests is totally comparable :roll:
 
Mustachio said:
I think "new media" and the "alt-right" will be viewed as an easily manipulated group of aging closet racists that vote purely out of a rage toward anybody who isn't white and angry about nothing and see themselves as victims of a system that tries to help people who need help and have been abandoned by billionaires who only care about what's best for themselves.
Click to expand...

Did you hit all the Daily Kos talking points?
 
Mustachio said:
Uhhhhh... I'm pretty center, but "new media" is a group of websites that rely on innuendo and tweets for their articles. I wrote a series of articles about "new media" about 5 years ago and the term was warmly embraced by them. They see the mainstream media as biased, which most people think it is and can be, but "new media" doesn't fact check. They also love click bait, selective editing, borderline criminal methodology and no fact checking. Questions?
Click to expand...

I'm having a hard time distinguishing your description of new media and the MSMs.
 
Fishking said:
I'm having a hard time distinguishing your description of new media and the MSMs.
Click to expand...

I'd say this reveals more about you than the poster's description.

#justsayin'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom