• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Since Friday, ABC, NBC, CBS attack Comey 3 to 1 over Clinton

Grim17

Battle Ready
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
34,478
Reaction score
17,282
Location
Southwestern U.S.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
This graphic says it all...


comeyBias.jpg

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.
 
This graphic says it all...


View attachment 67209368

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.

It isn't really American to shoot the messanger. Well, it wasn't, anyway.
 
This graphic says it all...


View attachment 67209368

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.

The big reversal of some from applauding / condemning Comey to condemning / applauding Comey shows you how partisan driven they all are, which, sadly, includes the news media, which it really shouldn't.

Shows you exactly how far the profession of journalism in the US has fallen into little more than a Democratic propaganda organ.

Isn't it time that the news network expel their overly biased, overly active supporters of a single party? Just in the hopes of at least appearing somewhat impartial and unbiased?

Donna Brazile is the typical Democrat politician. A corrupt liar just like Hillary. They fired her earlier today after the second email came out on WikiLeaks where she promised to send more of the debate questions to the Hillary camp. As if that's not putting her thumb on the scales.

Need to expel George Stephanopoulos (the non-journalist journalist) who is deeply rooted at ABC, and probably does much the same.

I wonder how many other Democratic moles in the news media there are? I'll bet there are more than anyone thinks.
 
Last edited:
This graphic says it all...


View attachment 67209368

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.

Can you tell us all what there was in that story for the media to attack Clinton when the FBI Director admitted he had not read any of them and had no idea if even a single one was significant?
 
This graphic says it all...

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.

Of course he is being attacked, he said he didn't want to release any information on Trump because he didn't want to influence the election and then turns around and releases information about Hillary's case even though they won't even have gone through all the emails before the election to determine if there is an issue.

Now please tell us what is in the discovery so far that Hillary should be attacked for?
 
Interestingly enough, I couldn't find that graphic on Media Research Center.
 
Interestingly enough, I couldn't find that graphic on Media Research Center.
What is interesting about that, especially as the graphic indicates that MRC is the source for the information in the graphic, not the graphic itself.
 
Last edited:
What is interesting about that, especially as the graphic indicates that MRC is the source for the information in the graphic, not the graphic itself.

What is interesting about that is that I found nothing on MRC that popped up with this data set either. But if you have a link, then by all means, I would greatly appreciate it.
 
What is interesting about that is that I found nothing on MRC that popped up with this data set either. But if you have a link, then by all means, I would greatly appreciate it.
Then that is what you should have said in the first place, not make a totally irrelevant argument that the graphic isn't there when it is pretty clear the "source" was in reference to the information the graphic contained, not the graphic itself.

As for a link? That is not on me to provided.
 
Then that is what you should have said in the first place, not make a totally irrelevant argument that the graphic isn't there when it is pretty clear the "source" was in reference to the information the graphic contained, not the graphic itself.

As for a link? That is not on me to provided.

OK, well then this irrelevant response aside, where's the data? I know, it's not on you. Maybe the OP will link to the data.
 
The media wants to blame Comey because that is the spin the Clinton campaign wants them to use.
Clinton is trying to play the victim card. Oh poor me.... Just look at what that mean Comey is doing to me.

We are in this hot mess for one and one reason only. Hillary Clinton's terrible judgement. She set up a private server in her home and used it
while she was Secretary of State. She allowed highly classified material on the server which was a unclassified system. She put our nation at risk
for years by her actions. She left the State Dept in 2013 and all she had to do was hand over the server then. But she tried to hid the facts
about the server and when it was found out she lied about the server and e-mails for a year about it! Lied over and over. Crooked Hillary is solely responsible for what is happening
not James Comey.
 
So, are Clinton voters cool with Kaine after she gets impeached?

She'll be illegitimate from Day 1.
 
So, are Clinton voters cool with Kaine after she gets impeached?

She'll be illegitimate from Day 1.

Sure she will, keep telling yourself that. It is only going to make it sweeter when you are proven wrong. Just like president Romney is working out for you guys. :lamo
 
This graphic says it all...


View attachment 67209368

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.

Good. He deserves every ounce of criticism that he has received.

If he didn't want it, he shouldn't have thrown that piece of red meat sent that bizarre and obscure letter to the Republicans in Congress.
 
LOL comey breaks longstanding rules about not using public office to influence elections, publishing vague misinformation within 2 weeks of the election, and you're defending him ...?

"Mr. Comey appears to have grasped the importance of that rule in some contexts. On Monday, CNBC reported that in early October, Mr. Comey fought successfully to keep the F.B.I.’s name off a government report regarding evidence that Russia was attempting to interfere in the presidential election. He believed the report was accurate but did not want to sign on to it so close to the election."

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/31/fbis-comey-opposed-naming-russians-citing-election-timing-source.html

What a flip flop !!

So this guy KNOWS Hillary is innocent of criminal wrongdoing, explains as such, but then "releases" (alludes to) possible evidence that they didn't even look at or have a warrant to search, is this guy a moron, a hack, or both ?
 
So, are Clinton voters cool with Kaine after she gets impeached? She'll be illegitimate from Day 1.
The "not MY president" footstomping starts before she's even in office. So cute.
 
Comey was doing a good job when things were looking good for Hillary, and he was considered a fair and unbiased sort of individual.

And now?

The lunatic democrats are nibbling at his hemorrhoids.
 
This graphic says it all...


View attachment 67209368

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.

1. What does "critical" mean. If I were an anchor and said "Comey's letter was vague and didn't give many details..." would that count as critical?

2. Critical of Hillary for what? Are they saying that the media should be coming out and saying "why didn't Hillary disclose the emails found on Weiner's computer?"

Very confusing information from a really terrible source.
 
Comey was doing a good job when things were looking good for Hillary, and he was considered a fair and unbiased sort of individual.

And now?

The lunatic democrats are nibbling at his hemorrhoids.

He had conducted himself as a professional.

He decided to be a hypocrite. That's worthy of condemnation.
 
This graphic says it all...


View attachment 67209368

Now it's time for people to attack the source, because they have absolutely nothing that disputes the study.

.

This doesn't surprise me, the major over the air networks has always had a liberal or Democratic Party bent or bias. There isn't a single network out there that reports the fact based news anymore. Every news network at least leans left if not in the bag for the Democrats except Fox which is why the liberals are so upset at having Fox around. Their monopoly was broken by Fox.

Its all Comey's fault, not the fact Hillary with held all those e-mails from the FBI and tried to destroy them permanently. Not that Hillary could have provided every single one of them a long time back, but opted for delay, delay, delay. If no delay, all of this would have been front and center at the beginning of the year. Not now.

I don't blame Comey, it is Hillary herself who is to blame for all of this now coming to light. But then again, if it came to light at the beginning of the year, she may not have been the Democrat's nominee. If Trump somehow manages to win, Hillary will have no one but herself to blame. Not Comey. It was her actions that lead to all of this, not his.
 
No mention of CNN being biased? LOL

Did you hear the latest about Donna Brazile? She was on the payroll at CNN and someone who was part of their townhall passed the questions on to Brazille and she then passed them onto Clinton. They didn't do anything after that incident. Jake Tapper did make comments of disgust over the incident. But then another Wiki Leak document exposed Brazille feeding questions ahead of time in a debate against Sanders. Told her what the woman looked like, (she had a rash) that would be asking her a particular question.
After that discovery CNN fired her.

Look early on Wiki Leaks dropped a bomb on the media of those in the corner for Clinton.

Leaks Have Exposed Journalists In Clinton's Corner | The Daily Caller

And prior to that Guciffer 2.0 exposed all those journalists/reporters invited to a Clinton get together and listed all the names of those to go to in all media outlets that will spin a story in favor of Clinton.
CNN,
NBC,
ABC,
CBS,
Politico,
NYT
There was no person from FOX invited to that little gathering. But what is even telling is those that were invited to attend that declined are listed also.
Jake Tapper declined. And so did Mika of Morning Joe to their credit.

Leaked Docs Reveal Which Journalists Are Cozy With Clinton | The Daily Caller

So bias for Clinton? Hell yes.
 
OK, well then this irrelevant response aside,
Responding with irrelevancies makes it irrelevant, being on point does not, so I have no idea why you decided to make another (self claimed this time) irrelevant response.


, where's the data? I know, it's not on you. Maybe the OP will link to the data.
Asking me, and acknowledging it's not on me, all in the same reply. Strange.

I think I made it clear that my only argument here was in pointing out why you would not have found the graphic at MCR, as the claim in the graphic would indicate that the source material for the graphic came from MCR, not the graphic itself.

I have no investment in anything other than what I pointed out, so you are going to have to present your further questions to someone else.
 
Back
Top Bottom