• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CBS News producer shows how easy it is to buy an assault rifle

OpportunityCost said:
http://www.constitution.org/2ll/2ndschol/89vand.pdf



The only way you could conclude as you are is if you ignore multitudes of sources in favor of a political view rather than a factual view.
Click to expand...

No: the conclusion is based on your inability to frame an argument that advances your point (if you have one), and credibly refutes the information given in the source by a credible writer on the subject.

You failed the challenge in every way. Pulling up out of context quote after quote, several of which have been absolutely bogus says nothing and only advances the conclusion that you have no talent for actual debate.
 
jet57 said:
No: the conclusion is based on your inability to frame an argument that advances your point (if you have one), and credibly refutes the information given in the source by a credible writer on the subject.

You failed the challenge in every way. Pulling up out of context quote after quote, several of which have been absolutely bogus says nothing and only advances the conclusion that you have no talent for actual debate.
Click to expand...

The article discusses original intent of the 2nd Amendment. I have now given you a Valparaiso law review regarding the 2nd and original intent. That refutes the author of your article as well as the other quotes which are not false does refute the idea in your article regarding the 2nd as an individual right.

Not to mention SCOTUS rulings placing the 2nd as an individual right, per all other references to "the people" within the Bill of Rights referring to individual rights. I have yet to see you present any evidence to bolster the original article.
 
"CBS News producer shows how easy it is to buy an assault rifle"

As it should be.
 
OpportunityCost said:
The article discusses original intent of the 2nd Amendment. I have now given you a Valparaiso law review regarding the 2nd and original intent. That refutes the author of your article as well as the other quotes which are not false does refute the idea in your article regarding the 2nd as an individual right.

Not to mention SCOTUS rulings placing the 2nd as an individual right, per all other references to "the people" within the Bill of Rights referring to individual rights. I have yet to see you present any evidence to bolster the original article.
Click to expand...

Jet has no chance of establishing that the second amendment is anything BUT the recognition of a pre-existing natural right that the founders all saw as fundamental
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom