• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump is Right to Question Hispanic Judge

Excon said:
Stop with the delusions.
There is nothing wrong with what he said except in the convoluted irrational bias of Trump haters.
Click to expand...

And Trump supporters.
 
Excon said:
iLOL Said the one who hasn't made a rational argument yet.


Besides being wrong.
Proof is not needed to suggest the appearance exists, which it does.

And the Judges membership with an organization that is out to boycott Trump and harm him because of his political stances is very compelling.
That Judge, who is a member, is in a position to do just that.


There is that irrationality again.

Of course Trump should be the one to do.
Click to expand...


So then if its such a cut and dried case of bias, why is the genius Trump trying it in public and not having all the "great people" around him make a motion in court the way anyone else would do it?

Why?

Because he knows he's ****ed.
 
Excon said:
Stop with the delusions.
There is nothing wrong with what he said except in the convoluted irrational bias of Trump haters.
Click to expand...



Here we go...

Just like Obamabots, it's "poor me" attack, attack, attack" and accuse of others of having the hate you hold

Just like Obama only worse. You guys are such babies you can't make a comment on Trump without you going full Kim Jong and accusing anyone and everyone of hate..EXACTLY like the Obama crowd.

He's too thin skinned to be in public office, he's so thin skinned he makes a war out of everything.
 
MrT said:
At this point, should Breitbart just re-name themselves into Trump.com? Or perhaps Alt-right.com?

Why even pretend to be a journalistic source for news.
Click to expand...
When was Breitbart considered news?
 
Excon said:
No, it was only establish in the convoluted irrational bias of his detractors.
Click to expand...

Did Trump's detractors claim that the Judge suffered from a fundamental conflict of interest because of the Judge's mexican heritage? Because I could have sworn that was Trump.

Also, do you really need me to list the Trump supporters, some of whom were previously on the short list to become his Vice Presidential Pick, that have come out and very publicly and denounced his position?
 
Fearandloathing said:
Here we go...

Just like Obamabots, it's "poor me" attack, attack, attack" and accuse of others of having the hate you hold

Just like Obama only worse. You guys are such babies you can't make a comment on Trump without you going full Kim Jong and accusing anyone and everyone of hate..EXACTLY like the Obama crowd.

He's too thin skinned to be in public office, he's so thin skinned he makes a war out of everything.
Click to expand...

And how many threads are there on this one issue? How many attack Trump threads?
 
clownboy said:
And how many threads are there on this one issue? How many attack Trump threads?
Click to expand...

How many times has Trump or his surrogates defended the position as being non-racist and rational?

Also, when are you going to make your next "Trump is up by X points in Y poll" thread? Because I'm going to bet that it never happens again. Hope you enjoyed the one.
 
clownboy said:
And how many threads are there on this one issue? How many attack Trump threads?
Click to expand...



Relevance?

Oh, I see. because it's Trump we should refrain from commenting?

We're going back in time. We went through all these false arguments with Obama supporters.....


Exactly the same thing only you're not using race. Exactly the same.
 
MrT said:
And I assume you have a point as to why a quote from Justice Sotomayor from 2000 and ****ing 1 about the influence of a person's racial and sexual identity on their judicial decisions, in general, has a direct bearing on a completely different ****ing judge 15 years later in terms of his ability to rule on this one SPECIFIC case?

Oh wait! I get it! Justice Sotomayor is Hispanic. And this guy is Hispanic!

They're practically the same person!
Click to expand...

If you are unable to see the point , I understand liberals rarely do .
 
Fearandloathing said:
See bold.

Who cares? Who besides Trump propagandists care what happened 15 years ago.

I repeat. If Trump has a case, he can and should move legally to remove said judge, not try the case in public. Either he's totally bull****ting about having all these "great people" or he knows he's ****ed and is trying to get out of it.

Either way, he's dishonest.
Click to expand...

And the judge is totally dishonest and has no business hearing the case .
 
Wiggen said:
Funny how Trump's lawyers in the case of the gigantic scam that is Trump University don't agree with you. In their words, the Judge is doing his job. You Trumpies need to get out more.
Click to expand...

They agree but are smart enough not to say it . This judge is 100% bias !!
 
Socrates1 said:
And the judge is totally dishonest and has no business hearing the case .
Click to expand...

Then file a motion in court.

Don't parade your racism in front of the camera or post about it on some forum.
 
Socrates1 said:
They agree but are smart enough not to say it . This judge is 100% bias !!
Click to expand...

...does that mean that you and Trump are dumb enough to say it?
 
Socrates1 said:
They agree but are smart enough not to say it . This judge is 100% bias !!
Click to expand...

You mean the judge who put his own life and the lives of his family on the line by going after drug cartel members when he was a Prosecutor? That judge?

And no, they don't agree. If they agreed they would have filed a motion asking the judge to recuse himself. They haven't done so.

But keep swallowing the Trump Pablum. It makes for amusing reading.
 
MrT said:
Then file a motion in court.

Don't parade your racism in front of the camera or post about it on some forum.
Click to expand...

He is entitled to state his opinion , I believe he still has First Amendment rights ! Trump see the illegals burning American flags and beating up supporters , throwing eggs at women , and he see where this judge is headed . There is no way that judge should have even considered hearing this case .
 
Excon said:

Former attorney general: Trump right to question judge’s fairness

Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says Donald Trump is right to challenge the fairness a judge overseeing lawsuits against him.

[...]

“These circumstances, while not necessarily conclusive, at least raise a legitimate question to be considered,” said Gonzales, who was attorney general for former President George W. Bush.​

Former attorney general: Trump right to question judge’s fairness | TheHill​
Click to expand...

John Yoo, who served in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel during the George W. Bush administration, said Trumps behavior and attacks against the judicial system are "disturbing".

Donald Trump's smear campaign against a federal judge has so troubled the legal community that even the conservative lawyer who authored the George W. Bush administration's so-called "torture memos" said the presumptive GOP nominee's behavior is "disturbing."
Click to expand...

Even John Yoo Thinks Trump's Attacks On Trump U Judge Are 'Disturbing'



Conservatives are definitely not in agreement about their nominee. There might be fireworks at the Republican convention, yet.
 
Fearandloathing said:
So then if its such a cut and dried case of bias, why is the genius Trump trying it in public and not having all the "great people" around him make a motion in court the way anyone else would do it?

Why?

Because he knows he's ****ed.
Click to expand...
As I have said. It is an appearance.

And you attaching your delusional reasons to Trump is hilarious.


Fearandloathing said:
Here we go...

Just like Obamabots, it's "poor me" attack, attack, attack" and accuse of others of having the hate you hold

Just like Obama only worse. You guys are such babies you can't make a comment on Trump without you going full Kim Jong and accusing anyone and everyone of hate..EXACTLY like the Obama crowd.

He's too thin skinned to be in public office, he's so thin skinned he makes a war out of everything.
Click to expand...
Said one of the ones actually crying.


The appearance of bias is there yet the cry babies want to attack Trump and say it isn't.
The only reason for that is the convoluted irrational bias that they have been displaying from the get.




MrT said:
Did Trump's detractors claim that the Judge suffered from a fundamental conflict of interest because of the Judge's mexican heritage? Because I could have sworn that was Trump.
Click to expand...
Have you so easily forgotten that it was the detractors making an issue of Trump speaking of a valid concern?

Trump sides points out a valid concern. Nothing wrong with that.
Trump haters then criticize him for it.

Yeah, seem like you have forgotten.


MrT said:
Also, do you really need me to list the Trump supporters, some of whom were previously on the short list to become his Vice Presidential Pick, that have come out and very publicly and denounced his position?
Click to expand...
iLOL
I wouldn't care if you do, but it would be hilarious as it has absolutely nothing to do with his valid concern regarding the Judge.
 
MrT said:
...does that mean that you and Trump are dumb enough to say it?
Click to expand...

I believe you are trying to get me to make similar remarks and heed a warning . I'll just say smart people try not to poop where they have to work and I'm not a lawyer so I will say it for them .
 
Socrates1 said:
He is entitled to state his opinion , I believe he still has First Amendment rights ! Trump see the illegals burning American flags and beating up supporters , throwing eggs at women , and he see where this judge is headed . There is no way that judge should have even considered hearing this case .
Click to expand...

Just because Trump has a right to say it...doesn't mean he should. He's trying to influence the outcome of his court case from the bully pulpit of a presidential candidate. That is so wrong on so many levels.
 
Wiggen said:
You mean the judge who put his own life and the lives of his family on the line by going after drug cartel members when he was a Prosecutor? That judge?

And no, they don't agree. If they agreed they would have filed a motion asking the judge to recuse himself. They haven't done so.

But keep swallowing the Trump Pablum. It makes for amusing reading.
Click to expand...

Yes , indeed that bias judge the one that supports Killary Rotten Clinton to the tune of $ 700,000 ! that judge !! How's that foul tasting "change " kool aid . :lamo
 
Moot said:
Just because Trump has a right to say it...doesn't mean he should. He's trying to influence the outcome of his court case from the bully pulpit of a presidential candidate. That is so wrong on so many levels.
Click to expand...

He is not the President yet , that happens in Nov. :lamo
 
Moot said:
John Yoo, who served in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel during the George W. Bush administration, said Trumps behavior and attacks against the judicial system are "disturbing".



Even John Yoo Thinks Trump's Attacks On Trump U Judge Are 'Disturbing'



Conservatives are definitely not in agreement about their nominee. There might be fireworks at the Republican convention, yet.
Click to expand...
And?
1. As a Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel, he was not even close to being the Attorney General?
2. Possibly the reason why the AG was tapped a day later for his opinion.
3. Yoo's comment came after the further revealing information provided in this thread.
So providing Yoo as a counter really is ineffective.
 
Wiggen said:
Funny how Trump's lawyers in the case of the gigantic scam that is Trump University don't agree with you. In their words, the Judge is doing his job. You Trumpies need to get out more.
Click to expand...

What's really funny is no one cares about Clintons' Laureate school scam, millions in grants while Killary was in charge WHY ? :shock:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom