• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rachel Maddow's program experienced gigantic ratings growth....................

That video is really problematic. First, it's only audio from two different different television shows: you can hear that it's a cheap mic recording the television set, so you can't see dates. O'donnell and Maddow are obviously not talking to each other or about each other's commentary, so that's just a hack job.

Now, if Maddow is such a liar, you should have no problem finding ALL of those lies.

As expected, the king of excluding information is given some and excludes it. I'm sorry, I am not here to educate you, if it really matters to you, you can go digging for information. Rest assured its out there, I refuse to play the game where I spend time making substantive posts for you to discard them with little to no consideration. ANY biased news source is going to have some dishonest or truth bending propaganda they pushed, conservative or liberal. Its just the way the game is played.

ALL? WTF. Get real.
 
As expected, the king of excluding information is given some and excludes it. I'm sorry, I am not here to educate you, if it really matters to you, you can go digging for information. Rest assured its out there, I refuse to play the game where I spend time making substantive posts for you to discard them with little to no consideration. ANY biased news source is going to have some dishonest or truth bending propaganda they pushed, conservative or liberal. Its just the way the game is played.

ALL? WTF. Get real.

You can't show anything credible dude.
 
You can't show anything credible dude.

Exactly my point. I gave you an example and you excluded it and refuse to search for something else.

Here are some more: All False statements involving Rachel Maddow | PunditFact

For you to insist on ALL is just a stupid argument. I can give you examples to ask for all is just setting the bar too damn high, as per your usual. Quit posting lazy and expecting the parting of the Red Sea from your opponents.
 
I am sorry you find the news report disturbing because you ate made to feel uncomfortable.......
RATINGS UPDATE

For the week of May 9, 2016

25-54 Demo

Nightly Average
419k - Kelly
279k - Maddow

Nights won
5 - Kelly
0 - Maddow

Kelly averaged 50% more viewers per night than Maddow.



Total Viewers

Nightly Average
2.356 Million - Kelly
1.182 Million - Maddow

Nights won
5 - Kelly
0 - Maddow

Kelly averaged 99% more viewers per night than Maddow.​

*********************************************************************

I'm feeling no more uncomfortable now, than I was when you put out that misleading liberal propaganda you started this thread with.

See ya next week, when I post this weeks ratings for you.
 
RATINGS UPDATE

For the week of May 9, 2016

25-54 Demo

Nightly Average
419k - Kelly
279k - Maddow

Nights won
5 - Kelly
0 - Maddow

Kelly averaged 50% more viewers per night than Maddow.



Total Viewers

Nightly Average
2.356 Million - Kelly
1.182 Million - Maddow

Nights won
5 - Kelly
0 - Maddow

Kelly averaged 99% more viewers per night than Maddow.​

*********************************************************************

I'm feeling no more uncomfortable now, than I was when you put out that misleading liberal propaganda you started this thread with.

See ya next week, when I post this weeks ratings for you.

The article was speaking to the improvement of Maddow's ratings..............and is not about who has the most viewers...........

Why are yall so defensive?
 
The article was speaking to the improvement of Maddow's ratings..............and is not about who has the most viewers...........

Why are yall so defensive?

The times they are a changing... lol
 
Back
Top Bottom