• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Religions and clothing

Should religions be allowed to tell us which way we dress?

  • No!

    Votes: 8 57.1%

  • Yes!

    Votes: 3 21.4%

  • I do not know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • other

    Votes: 3 21.4%
  • Total voters
    14
TypicalRussian said:
because he conquired the pennisula
Click to expand...

No, he suceeded his father, Justin I, who was a Roman general that won a civil war. Justin and Justinian were born in Thrace. Heraclius was born in North Africa etc.

Do I have to relate the entire period of history just for your benefit?
 
NWO_Spook said:
No, he suceeded his father, Justin I, who was a Roman general that won a civil war. Justin and Justinian were born in Thrace. Heraclius was born in North Africa etc.
Click to expand...

he was known as the last roman
 
NWO_Spook said:
Yes, some called him that, but he wasn't of course. What is not getting through your skull is that Roman did not mean the place of birth, but a citizen of the empire.
Click to expand...

he was of course as the italic roman empire where it origniated was divided-one into greek and one into latin-over a long time, the greeks went away from the dominat italic rome
 
TypicalRussian said:
he was of course as the italic roman empire where it origniated was divided-one into greek and one into latin-over a long time, the greeks went away from the dominat italic rome
Click to expand...

Wrong. Only Constantinople existed as the capital when Justinian was invested with the purple (see what I posted about Honorius and Arcadius earlier). He later retook the Italian peninsula, but his successors lost it again. The rest of your garbled response makes no sense, but it seems you may be alluding to the transformation I mentioned earlier.

Are you aware of the fact that in 212 AD, Caracalla (born in Lepcis Magna in modern Tunisia) made everyone within the empire a citizen of Rome?
 
I think religions should allowed to tell their members what clothes to wear, but nobody should be allowed to force anyone to participate in a religion, and that includes children being required by their parents to go to church.
 
TypicalRussian said:
orthodox is not papacy and there has been eras where degeneracy rises, usually just before a crisis
Click to expand...

You were making it sound like the Catholic Chuch was somehow different.
 
8 x No!
3 x Yes


So there is hope!
 
swing_voter said:
In America, we have the Pentecostal protestant faith.

They have strict guidelines as to what women can wear. They forbid makeup, for example.

The Amish and the Mennonites have a strict dress code as well.


You don't have to belong to those faiths, if you don't want to.
Click to expand...

Amish, yes, Mennonites and Pentecostals (the latter is not a demomination), not so much.
 
NWO_Spook said:
Wrong. Only Constantinople existed as the capital when Justinian was invested with the purple (see what I posted about Honorius and Arcadius earlier). He later retook the Italian peninsula, but his successors lost it again. The rest of your garbled response makes no sense, but it seems you may be alluding to the transformation I mentioned earlier.

Are you aware of the fact that in 212 AD, Caracalla (born in Lepcis Magna in modern Tunisia) made everyone within the empire a citizen of Rome?
Click to expand...

because he was the last Roman
 
NWO_Spook said:
Nonsense. They said the same thing about Mauricius Tiberius, for it was common propaganda among supporters in the texts.

Please try to develop a sound argument based upon knowledge of the subject.
Click to expand...

justinian was greek but conquered italic rome for his subjects, thus he became roman, they eventually lost the province thus it became less italic roman

heres the fact: over a long time, the byzatine greeks became less roman
 
TypicalRussian said:
justinian was greek but conquered italic rome for his subjects, thus he became roman, they eventually lost the province thus it became less italic roman
Click to expand...

Why do you ignore the content of my posts? Please exercise a little integrity in debate, for I have no patience for those who play games.

heres the fact: over a long time, the byzatine greeks became less roman
Click to expand...

That does not change the fact that the so-called Byzantine empire was the Roman Empire. This is so tedious, so I suggest you read Gibbon's Decline and Fall Of The Roman Empire

Just read the first page (app.161 AD) and the last (1453 AD) and that will tell you what I have been trying to explain to you for the last few pages.
 
NWO_Spook said:
Why do you ignore the content of my posts? Please exercise a little integrity in debate, for I have no patience for those who play games.



That does not change the fact that the so-called Byzantine empire was the Roman Empire. This is so tedious, so I suggest you read Gibbon's Decline and Fall Of The Roman Empire

Just read the first page (app.161 AD) and the last (1453 AD) and that will tell you what I have been trying to explain to you for the last few pages.
Click to expand...

your context was factually incorrect

finland is the only legitate claim of the roman empire, is that realistic
 
TypicalRussian said:
your context was factually incorrect

finland is the only legitate claim of the roman empire, is that realistic
Click to expand...


It is clear you have no idea of what I'm talking about, as usual. You are tedious, ignorant and illiterate and I'm sick to death of your vapid noise.

Present evidence to counter that which I have provided, or just leave me alone.
 
Last edited:
NWO_Spook said:
It is clear you have no idea of what I'm talking about, as usual. You are tedious, ignorant and illiterate and I'm sick to death of your vapid noise.

Present evidence to counter that which I have provided, or just leave me alone.
Click to expand...

i have presented evidence
 
TypicalRussian said:
i have presented evidence
Click to expand...

No, you haven't ~ you've just raved on with what you believe and I don't care about what you believe. Obviously, you have not studied the subject, so I can dismiss your unqualified opinion for what it is ~ an unqualified opinion of no merit.

I presented sound evidence that you completely ignored in order to push your belief system and I don't waste time on that type of 'debate' any longer.

Now, are you finished with yanking my chain?
 
NWO_Spook said:
No, you haven't ~ you've just raved on with what you believe and I don't care about what you believe. Obviously, you have not studied the subject, so I can dismiss your unqualified opinion for what it is ~ an unqualified opinion of no merit.

I presented sound evidence that you completely ignored in order to push your belief system and I don't waste time on that type of 'debate' any longer.

Now, are you finished with yanking my chain?
Click to expand...

"yanking your chain" YOUR the one who started this by objective false history in a dicussion about sex and culture
 
TypicalRussian said:
"yanking your chain" YOUR the one who started this by objective false history in a dicussion about sex and culture
Click to expand...

LOLOL Whatever, I don't care what you think at all. You clearly don't know what you're talking about and I'm done with your silliness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom