• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nasty militant atheists

So you think God is invented in the head?



Yes, All gods all the creation of man and they only exist in the imagination of those who believe. God first existed as a way to answer questions that early man had and desperately wanted to be answered but was unable to do so. Questions such as what is lightning, what controls the rotation of the sun, how we are supposed to live, and where the rain/floods cames from. "God did it" was the universal answer and they created stories to describe how and why it happened.

Those stories were the basis of early religions and became plagiarized into the Abrahamic religions such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
 
Last edited:
Yes, All gods all the creation of man and they only exist in the imagination of those who believe. God first existed as a way to answer questions that early man had and desperately wanted to be answered but was unable to do so. Questions such as what is lightning, what controls the rotation of the sun, and where the rain/floods cames from. "God did it" was the universal answer and they created stories to describe how and why it happened.

Those stories were the basis of early religions and became plagiarized into the Abrahamic religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

well thats just not true
 
One of our regular chatters has a predilection to often use the phrase “militant atheist”. I have seen other chatter use it also.
So it got me to thInking: What exactly is a militant atheist? Is it an atheist who openly avows his atheism. What’s wrong with that? Or maybe a person who is willing to publicly debate his or her atheism. Again, how exactly is that a problem?
At least in the United States, we have the First Amendment that allows atheists to openly acknowledge same. The first part of the First Amendment allows for free speech, and the second part for living WITHOUT religion.
We know that some ministers openly sell their religion on TV, and often take in a good amount of filthy lucre doing so. What is an atheist developed a TV program. Would there be a huge outcry from the religionists that it would ruin our youth and destroy our nation? Very likely, at least from some.
So what exactly is a militant atheist? Maybe some of out theistic friends can help us with this.

As for “nasty racist”, I’ve only seen it used once, and that was as a confession by someone that he was a “nasty racist” until his mid-20s. I’ll see if he will explain what that meant. He got in people’s faces uninvited regarding their religious beliefs? He enjoys picking fights with believers? I don’t know.

I hope that I am neither a militant nor a nasty racist. I only discuss it with those who have a secure faith and who basically offer an invitation to do so. I have lived next door to a minister/retired minister for 15 years and we have never discussed it. We discuss mowing our yards and tending our gardens. He knows I don’t go to church, and he may know that I am a Humanist because he sometimes picks up my mail when I am on vacation, and I receive letters from the American Humanist Association, but he may not even know what a Humanist is. Most people don’t. And I really consider myself more of a Humanist than an atheist. It’s how I describe myself.

I certainly discuss it in here because the is a voluntary forum. It’s a tough place for believers, but they don’t have to be here. They can always go to a Christian chat room if it gets too tough for them on here.

Anyway, my advice is to not be a nasty racist. More bees with honey than with vinegar,and that sort of thing.

As for a “militant atheist”, I still don’t know what that is!

Interesting... As far as I'm concerned, militant atheists and militant theists are the same kind of person. It is superiority combined with entitlement, where everyone should be like they are, and anyone who isn't deserves their derision and interference.

Most folks that define themselves by one aspect of their life (theist / atheist, lefty / righty, pro-Nickelback / anti-Nickelback) are militant these days, as can be demonstrated all across this forum. These happen to be militant times.
 
You have the ignorance of the physical man on your side...

I have space in my signature for one more quote from you if you are feeling generous and creative.

Can you prove that there is a supernatural realm existing?
 
I have space in my signature for one more quote from you if you are feeling generous and creative.

Can you prove that there is a supernatural realm existing?

Go ahead, knock yourself out...:2rofll:

 
Go ahead, knock yourself out...:2rofll:



Is it a problem for you that I want a logical argument or some sort of facts that can be verified?

Where is the evidence of a supernatural or even a spiritual realm existing? Your beliefs are your alone and are subjective to the person. They are not facts or evidence of anything but that you have made a decision based on unsupportable emotions and beliefs. Your JW circle jerk is not persuasive to others.
 
Last edited:
Lisa;1072442284[B said:
Is it a problem for you that I want a logical argument or some sort of facts that can be verified? [/B]

Where is the evidence of a supernatural or even a spiritual realm existing? Your beliefs are your alone and are subjective to the person. They are not facts or evidence of anything but that you have made a decision based on unsupportable emotions and beliefs. Your JW circle jerk is not persuasive to others.

Logic is always a problem for her.
 
Is it a problem for you that I want a logical argument or some sort of facts that can be verified?

Where is the evidence of a supernatural or even a spiritual realm existing? Your beliefs are your alone and are subjective to the person. They are not facts or evidence of anything but that you have made a decision based on unsupportable emotions and beliefs.

Your quest is futile/useless/stupid and Paul explains why...which is why I don't waste my time...

"But a physical man does not accept the things of the spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot get to know them, because they are examined spiritually.." 1 Corinthians 2:14
 
Militant atheist might refer to the "new atheist."
They're following the dictates of Dawkins to mock and humiliate theists with every opportunity.

So God is real but evolution is not?
 
Your quest is futile/useless/stupid and Paul explains why...which is why I don't waste my time...

"But a physical man does not accept the things of the spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot get to know them, because they are examined spiritually.." 1 Corinthians 2:14

Quoting a bible to an atheist doesn't help your argument because I don't believe your myths.
 
Quoting a bible to an atheist doesn't help your argument because I don't believe your myths.

Point proven...and I don't believe your lies...so?
 
Interesting... As far as I'm concerned, militant atheists and militant theists are the same kind of person. It is superiority combined with entitlement, where everyone should be like they are, and anyone who isn't deserves their derision and interference.

Most folks that define themselves by one aspect of their life (theist / atheist, lefty / righty, pro-Nickelback / anti-Nickelback) are militant these days, as can be demonstrated all across this forum. These happen to be militant times.

Can you name a militant atheist? I have never come across one.
 
Can you name a militant atheist? I have never come across one.

There are posters on this forum who've identified as such...:roll:
 
Point proven...and I don't believe your lies...so?

What do you claim that I have said are lies?

What point did you prove?
 
What do you claim that I have said are lies?

What point did you prove?

Seems to be the fav game of many atheists...ain't gonna play that game with you...n'uh...:naughty

 
Can you name a militant atheist? I have never come across one.

giphy.gif
 
If you're out to win hearts and minds, nasty isn't the way to go.
 
Please give me three reasons why illogical and factually wrong claims should not be mocked?

If ad adult defended the Easter Bunny or claimed that 1+1=11 would you not think that they were ignorant?

Read my previous responses to you in another thread. Ignoring the logic and explanation, is irrational!
And, just ignoring them won't necessarily make them disappear either!

That's what makes new atheists like you.......................looking so pathetic!
Your group demonstrates you are not familiar with the term "reason." :lol:

If you hadn't noticed - it's new atheists that are quite so easily................."mockable." :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
So God is real but evolution is not?

:roll:

Yooo-hoooo?

I was responding to your question "what's nasty militant atheism." I showed you the guru and his lemmings!
Those are the pathetic "militant atheists" - the nasty kind - in a nutshell. :mrgreen:
They're like an ignorant kamikaze group!


They remind me of a scraggly little yappy dog, and angry chihuahuas! :lol:








The Four Horsemen review - whatever happened to ‘New Atheism’?

[video]https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jan/31/four-horsemen-review-what-happened-to-new-atheism-dawkins-hitchens[/video]




Dawkins et al bring us into disrepute - Michael Ruse

Dawkins et al bring us into disrepute | Religion | The Guardian





If evolution is real............. I think we found the missing link between primates and humans! The new atheists! :lamo



Surely you don't want to derail your own topic?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom