• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does your view of God vary depending on circumstances?

No, you don't have to. However, I have objective and tangible evidence that in principle, ex-wives exist. The claim is not extraordinary. I don't have objective and tangible evidence that any deity exists. I do have objective and tangible evidence people believe in a god and/or gods, but that does not mean that God/gods exist. I do have objective and tangible evidence people can misinterpret things, and people have emotional reactions.

What can you SHOW me. Do you have something that you can show me, and give me a reason that what you show me is evidence for a God that doesn't assume there is a God?

I can't show you a thought. Neither can I show you Harrison Ford or God. I can't even show you the key board on which I am typing.

I am as certain of the existence of God as I am of the existence of Harrison Ford, human thought and my keyboard as I am of God.

God is likely chuckling at our little exchange here. At least, I HOPE He's chuckling. I'd hate to be a pillar of salt after I send this. I have a lawn to mow. Which also exists and which I also cannot show you.
 
Nothing of merit to one who can see through this sort of false analogy, yes, and there's no need to apologise.

Ah, but there is.

Just as I was never able to adequately explain the beauty of the Packers Power Sweep to my ex-wife, I am unable to explain this to you.

Again, I am sorry.
 
I can't show you a thought. Neither can I show you Harrison Ford or God. I can't even show you the key board on which I am typing.

I am as certain of the existence of God as I am of the existence of Harrison Ford, human thought and my keyboard as I am of God.

God is likely chuckling at our little exchange here. At least, I HOPE He's chuckling. I'd hate to be a pillar of salt after I send this. I have a lawn to mow. Which also exists and which I also cannot show you.

Since Harrison Ford is still alive, I can give you instructions how to show him. It can be objectively and tangibly observed, to even you if you followed the instructions. God, and thought, not so much. Thought can be represented by brain activity though, so I can show you thoughts being generated by the use of an MRI.
 
Ah, but there is.

Just as I was never able to adequately explain the beauty of the Packers Power Sweep to my ex-wife, I am unable to explain this to you.

Again, I am sorry.

Ok, so you admit you cannot articulate a demonstration of your claim with any efficacy. Apology accepted.
 
I can't show you a thought. Neither can I show you Harrison Ford or God. I can't even show you the key board on which I am typing.

I am as certain of the existence of God as I am of the existence of Harrison Ford, human thought and my keyboard as I am of God.

God is likely chuckling at our little exchange here. At least, I HOPE He's chuckling. I'd hate to be a pillar of salt after I send this. I have a lawn to mow. Which also exists and which I also cannot show you.

An imaginary being having a chuckle!
 
I can't show you a thought. Neither can I show you Harrison Ford or God. I can't even show you the key board on which I am typing.

I am as certain of the existence of God as I am of the existence of Harrison Ford, human thought and my keyboard as I am of God.

God is likely chuckling at our little exchange here. At least, I HOPE He's chuckling. I'd hate to be a pillar of salt after I send this. I have a lawn to mow. Which also exists and which I also cannot show you.

You just proved yourself wrong. Your post is your thoughts. typed into words on this forum.
 
You just proved yourself wrong. Your post is your thoughts. typed into words on this forum.

No keyboard was involved, this thoughtful and willful god thought the post into existence.
 
Since Harrison Ford is still alive, I can give you instructions how to show him. It can be objectively and tangibly observed, to even you if you followed the instructions. God, and thought, not so much. Thought can be represented by brain activity though, so I can show you thoughts being generated by the use of an MRI.

Are the topic(s) of thoughts also real?
 
Ok, so you admit you cannot articulate a demonstration of your claim with any efficacy. Apology accepted.

I appreciate your understanding of my inability.
 
You just proved yourself wrong. Your post is your thoughts. typed into words on this forum.

One of my thoughts was God.

With respect, you have just proven yourself wrong. ;)
 
Are the topic(s) of thoughts also real?

It all depends on what the topics are and what your definition of the word topic is. One can really think about imaginary beings such as goblins leprechauns and gods. That will not magic them into existence.
 
One of my thoughts was God.

With respect, you have just proven yourself wrong. ;)

God is real because you can think about a god? How does that work? I just thought about pixies.
 
Back
Top Bottom