• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Christians destroy statues of Baphomet?

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
17,868
Reaction score
8,353
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
One Christian writer thinks it should happen

Christians should destroy all Baphomet statues

The list of statues, memorials and monuments torn down, defaced or destroyed across America grows long.

And now it’s Baphomet’s turn.

If the standard in this country for deciding on the fate of statues, memorials and monuments has become one of offense — meaning, if the structure offends, it must go — then Christians certainly have cause to go after all-things-Satanic Temple.

Christians might have a problem finding a Satanic monument to destroy but what the heck, I'm sure they will send out their finest investigators.
 
As long as it is on private property, why should we ask Christians to destroy... whatever?
 
One Christian writer thinks it should happen



Christians might have a problem finding a Satanic monument to destroy but what the heck, I'm sure they will send out their finest investigators.

Are they finally back from Hawaii?
 
I think what would more entertaining is painting "Black Lives Matter" on the pedestals of MLK and Rosa Parks statues just for the sheer enjoyment of watching some people's heads explode over the irony of an act like that.
 
No, Christians should not act in the futile ways of the world...

"So this is what I say and bear witness to in the Lord, that you should no longer go on walking just as the nations also walk, in the futility of their minds." Ephesians 4:17
 
I think what would more entertaining is painting "Black Lives Matter" on the pedestals of MLK and Rosa Parks statues just for the sheer enjoyment of watching some people's heads explode over the irony of an act like that.

That would be funny.
 
No, Christians should not act in the futile ways of the world...

"So this is what I say and bear witness to in the Lord, that you should no longer go on walking just as the nations also walk, in the futility of their minds." Ephesians 4:17

Interesting translation you have

17 Now this I affirm and insist on in the Lord: you must no longer live as the Gentiles live, in the futility of their minds. NRSV

17 So this I say, and affirm together with the Lord, that you walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk, in the futility of their mind NASB

17 This then I say and testify in the Lord: That henceforward you walk not as also the Gentiles walk in the vanity of their mind Douay-Rheims

17 This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind KJV
 
One Christian writer thinks it should happen



Christians might have a problem finding a Satanic monument to destroy but what the heck, I'm sure they will send out their finest investigators.

People should feel free to destroy any monument they want, with the permission of the owner of the monument.
 
Interesting translation you have

17 Now this I affirm and insist on in the Lord: you must no longer live as the Gentiles live, in the futility of their minds. NRSV

17 So this I say, and affirm together with the Lord, that you walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk, in the futility of their mind NASB

17 This then I say and testify in the Lord: That henceforward you walk not as also the Gentiles walk in the vanity of their mind Douay-Rheims

17 This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind KJV

By the time Paul wrote Ephesians the way for the Gentiles to receive salvation had already been opened up...thus the reason for "nations"...
 
By the time Paul wrote Ephesians the way for the Gentiles to receive salvation had already been opened up...thus the reason for "nations"...

The reason your Bible uses "nations" is little more than an attempt to change the original meaning that Paul was telling his congregations they must follow the Jewish texts and not as the Gentiles lived.

Then there is the fact that the majority of scholars believe that Ephesians was not written by Paul, owing to issues with terminology not found in the seven epistles accepted by all scholars as being the product of one author, whether his name was actually Paul is another issue, and eschatology.
 
The reason your Bible uses "nations" is little more than an attempt to change the original meaning that Paul was telling his congregations they must follow the Jewish texts and not as the Gentiles lived.

Then there is the fact that the majority of scholars believe that Ephesians was not written by Paul, owing to issues with terminology not found in the seven epistles accepted by all scholars as being the product of one author, whether his name was actually Paul is another issue, and eschatology.

So then...you shouldn't worry about anything he says...or is perceived to say...;)
 
One Christian writer thinks it should happen



Christians might have a problem finding a Satanic monument to destroy but what the heck, I'm sure they will send out their finest investigators.

That's one Christian's opinion.

Btw, did early Christians destroy statues of gods and goddesses?
 
Further info on Gentiles/nations...getting to the root of the word and it's meaning...

In course of time God designated Israel as his chosen people, bringing them into covenant relationship with himself. Because the Israelites were thus made distinct from the world in general, Paul could use koʹsmos, “world,” as equivalent to the non-Israelite “people of the nations,” or “Gentiles,” at Romans 11:12-15. (NW; KJ) He there pointed out that Israel’s apostasy led to God’s revoking his covenant relationship with them and that it opened up the way for the Gentiles to enter into such relationship and its riches, by being reconciled to God. (Compare Eph 2:11-13.) The “world,” or koʹsmos, then, during this post-Flood and pre-Christian period again designated all humanity outside of God’s approved servants, and specifically those outside Israel during the period of its covenant relationship with Jehovah.​—Compare Heb 11:38.

World — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
 
If Christians have statues of Satan in their churches, destroy them, yes.

If Americans have statues in public places that glorify racism, slavery, etc., yes, get rid of them.
 
Should Christians destroy statues of Baphomet?

No, let them have their idols.

I also don't believe that Christians should destroy any other religious icons, statues, or historical artifacts, here or abroad.

Leave that to the Taliban, ISIS, Leftists, and Democrats; they're ignorant animals.
 
That's one Christian's opinion.

Btw, did early Christians destroy statues of gods and goddesses?

Yes, they did. Early Christians not only destroyed "idols" but also tore down the temples and either banished, forced conversion, or killed those pagans who refused to bow to the TRUE LORD.
 
Yes, they did. Early Christians not only destroyed "idols" but also tore down the temples and either banished, forced conversion, or killed those pagans who refused to bow to the TRUE LORD.

Chapter and verse for that?
 
Chapter and verse for that?

Too many books, but . . . Constantine who was the first Roman Emperor to convert to Christianity ordered the destruction of a temple of Aphrodite in Jerusalem because it was supposedly built on the site of the crucifixion. He ordered the execution of pagan eunuch priests in Alexandria. During the reign of Constantius, beginning in 356, laws were approved that prescribed the death penalty for anyone who performed or attended pagan sacrifices or worshipped idols.

Valentinian II became the Emperor in the Western Roman Empire in 388. In 391, Valentinian II issued a law that prohibited sacrifices and that forbade anyone from visiting the temples of the old gods.

Theodosius I in 381 took the throne of the Eastern Roman Empire and in 392 became Emperor of the whole Empire. He authorized the destruction of pagan temples, holy sites, images and objects of reverence throughout the empire, though in some instances the old temples became Christian churches. Toward the end of his reign, Theodosius' instituted laws that are seen by some historians as a declaration of war on pagan religions. Even when the rites were kept within a residence and a family, pagan worship could result in executions, along with confiscation of property.

By 681, a council of bishops called on civil authorities to seize and behead all those guilty of non-Christian practices of any sort.
 
private vs public property

I think public statues should represent the people culturally and this staute can be easily proven not to
 
Too many books, but . . . Constantine who was the first Roman Emperor to convert to Christianity ordered the destruction of a temple of Aphrodite in Jerusalem because it was supposedly built on the site of the crucifixion. He ordered the execution of pagan eunuch priests in Alexandria. During the reign of Constantius, beginning in 356, laws were approved that prescribed the death penalty for anyone who performed or attended pagan sacrifices or worshipped idols.

Valentinian II became the Emperor in the Western Roman Empire in 388. In 391, Valentinian II issued a law that prohibited sacrifices and that forbade anyone from visiting the temples of the old gods.

Theodosius I in 381 took the throne of the Eastern Roman Empire and in 392 became Emperor of the whole Empire. He authorized the destruction of pagan temples, holy sites, images and objects of reverence throughout the empire, though in some instances the old temples became Christian churches. Toward the end of his reign, Theodosius' instituted laws that are seen by some historians as a declaration of war on pagan religions. Even when the rites were kept within a residence and a family, pagan worship could result in executions, along with confiscation of property.

By 681, a council of bishops called on civil authorities to seize and behead all those guilty of non-Christian practices of any sort.

By then apostasy had already crept into the congregation...I am talking about the early Christians who learned directly from Jesus...there are none...
 
No, let them have their idols.

I also don't believe that Christians should destroy any other religious icons, statues, or historical artifacts, here or abroad.

Leave that to the Taliban, ISIS, Leftists, and Democrats; they're ignorant animals.

You forgot Republicans and Evangelicals.
 
By then apostasy had already crept into the congregation...I am talking about the early Christians who learned directly from Jesus...there are none...

Don't know much of the history of early Christianity obviously. Also, if you meant "early Christians" as being only those of the 1st century you should have mentioned that point.

Funny how none of those "who learned directly from Jesus" managed to leave us any of their notes.
 
Don't know much of the history of early Christianity obviously. Also, if you meant "early Christians" as being only those of the 1st century you should have mentioned that point.

Funny how none of those "who learned directly from Jesus" managed to leave us any of their notes.

I asked for chapter and verse...SMH...
 
Yes, they did. Early Christians not only destroyed "idols" but also tore down the temples and either banished, forced conversion, or killed those pagans who refused to bow to the TRUE LORD.

That was during the reign of Constantine? It's more about politics.
If indeed the pagans had erected a statue on the site of the crucifixion - I'd say that's a provocation.



......persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire began during the reign of Constantine the Great in the military colonia of Aelia Capitolina (Jerusalem), when he executed the first recorded temple destruction for the purpose of constructing a church. Christian historians alleged that Hadrian had constructed a temple of Aphrodite on the site of the crucifixion on Golgotha hill in order to suppress Jewish-Christian veneration at the site. Constantine used that to justify the temple's destruction,
Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire - Wikipedia


Anyway, still on wiki......


The concept of Christianization embodies a multifaceted social process that underpinned the whole of Late Antique society. It functions in modern studies as an umbrella term for a hugely diverse set of motivations and ideologies.[1]:19 Historians assert that Christianization did not bring about the death of pagan culture.

Many cults were already in decline long before the Christian emperors because, after the invasions of the late 3rd century, resources for the restoration of the great temple complexes dried up.

Some aspects of pagan religion declined while those aspects of pagan practice which were popular were maintained, often beneath a Christian veneer.
This appears to be the case for all aspects of society touched by religion, from methods of worship, to the decorative arts, to architecture.[1]:23
Walter Kaegi depicts the world of Late Antiquity as one in which paganism had stagnated as it failed to challenge the emergence of Christianity and failed to adjust successfully to its less favourable position.[14] Roger S. Bagnall cautions that “One should not assume that the decline of pagan religion and the rise of Christianity are simply related, like children at opposite ends of a see-saw”.


People were converting to Christianity. Statues were probably torn down because they'd become neglected, and obsolete!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom