Speaking of Internet Skepticism's beloved comedy team Clueless and Nonsensical, get a load of this howler:
Your emoji fever dream notwithstanding, your "definition" of atheism is the only thing here that is clueless and nonsensical. As a great American once said, "You can run, but you can't hide." Idyllic Norther European atheism is over.
Sorry to rain on your parade, citizen, but your definition of atheism is indefensible and provides further proof, as if any were needed, that atheists don't exist, as we all were helped to see in that historical hysterical histrionic thread that unmasked the myth of atheism for good and all:
Atheists don't exist and your definition of atheism is incorrect.
"Answered" in your posts by way of emojis and the Internet Skeptic dismissal "Nonsense."
Lol, the definition you gave just proved my point. Disbelief and lack of belief are the same thing. There is no requirement to declare there's a 100% chance there's no god for one to be an atheist. You're making that up. You lack belief in god, atheist, just like the definition you provided says.
Hit a nerve, did I?The Top 8 reasons to ignore the tale of the non-existent fantasy that is called "Internet Skepticism" (and a lame 9th one just for the hell of it :lol: )
1. it is :bs
2. people who claim it is a real thing are a bit confused
3. because the fake notion of internet skepticism lacks any basis in reality
4. because the prognosticators of the non-existent "internet skepticism" won't take "we don't care what nonsensical things you claim" gracefully and keeps repeating themselves or if unanswered, they repeat parts of the thread
5. because the "fake internet skepticism" prognosticators usually don't know what they are talking about, yet nevertheless keep acting like people should agree it is a real thing
6. because the notion of making up stuff to create a false narrative is utterly unpractical and leads to nowhere but repetitive threads and nonsensical claims about the non-existent "internet skeptic"
7. because the constant referring to threads that also talk about things that are untrue (like the fantasy thread about the so-called "non-existing atheist"
8. because inevitably some poor poem gets warped/changed to fit a narrative that makes no sense
9. (the previously mentioned lame one) "I just couldn't be bothered to make up more reasons to ignore something that does not really exist to begin with (you know, internet skepticism).
Now for the Obligatory poem:
Illogical
loosely based on Snowball by Shel Silverstein
I once came across a most illogical idea
as wacky as could be.
It made a wacky claims about atheists and the like
and the whole thing made no sense to me.
I tried to reason and explain it was but a fake idea
that the whole premise being discussed was rather asinine.
The sad fact that discussing this is going nowhere fast
I may be self isolated, but this is a waste of my time
Your posts in defense of Internet Atheism and in opposition to Internet Skepticism belong next to the entry for "nonsense" in a creditable dictionary. These posts of yours illustrate perfectly the classic denials and dismissals of Internet Skepticism. Kudos.
