What Ockham himself did or didn't do with it doesn't really matter.
If you feel it can't apply to religion in any way that's fine.
Other's might feel different.
I've seen it applied, and heard people apply it to religion.
So here we are.
I stand corrected. One of the many things i like about this forum is that I can learn things. I never new that ol' Ockham was a Franciscan.
Occam's razor - Wikipedia
<snip>
The idea is attributed to English Franciscan friar William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), a scholastic philosopher and theologian who used a preference for simplicity to defend the idea of divine miracles.
It is sometimes paraphrased by a statement like "the simplest solution is most likely the right one".
<snip>
Apparently, this Razor was invented for exactly this consideration.
Still, though, if the matter considered is one of faith, then the idea of a simple solution or any solution to explain or to examine veracity seems to run counter to the idea of faith.
If you have faith, you don't need proof. If you have proof, you don't need faith.
The two methods to accept stuff seem to to run counter to one another. Of course, if you have both, you have a pretty rock solid base from which to proceed.
Regarding the two examples you presented in the OP, these sound more like examples of "Stuff Happens" than of evidence of divine grace or malevolence.
"I asked for strength and God gave me difficulties to make me strong
I asked for wisdom and God gave me problems to solve
I asked for prosperity and God gave me brawn and brain to work
I asked for courage and God gave me dangers to overcome
I asked for patience God placed me in situations where I was forced to wait
I asked for love and God gave me troubled people to help
I asked for favors and God gave me opportunities
I received nothing I wanted I received everything I needed
My Prayer Has Been Answered.
written by
Unknown"