• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

But, but where could God come from

really, just because there is a though question to answer, Atheim has no answer and result to nihilists ramblings

Religion does not have an answer. A god did it could not be called a rational answer.
 
Religion does not have an answer. A god did it could not be called a rational answer.

I don't disagree with you - religion doesn't have all the answers. Any religion is just the culmination of generations of humanity to try and provide a human explanation for something that is unexplainable. It's like a painting... no matter how skilled the artist, it will never convey the subject completely and in perfect clarity. And even if the subject doesn't personally appeal to you... wouldn't it be short-sighted to dismiss the artwork out of hand? Take the Mona Lisa, for instance... the subject of the painting may not fit your perception of feminine beauty, but that doesn't mean there isn't insight to gained from study Da Vinci's technique... or the personal touches he added to the painting, does it?

A masterpiece is a masterpiece, after all.... they all may have their flaws, but they all have something to teach you.
 
It's one thing to argue for some type of First Cause, another to argue that it was your version of this First cause that was responsible for everything.

If this God always existed, with what matters did It concern Itself with for that long eternity before It created anything?
 
It's one thing to argue for some type of First Cause, another to argue that it was your version of this First cause that was responsible for everything.

If this God always existed, with what matters did It concern Itself with for that long eternity before It created anything?

If there is one so called 'first cause', all it means is that there can be causes that are uncaused. Why does there have to be only one, and why call it God?
 
Oh, so you are saying the bible is biased?? Say it isn't so!

The Bible is biased but that doesnt mean anything, you claimed that my source was biased yet so war yours

Where the **** was the Bible in all this:giggle1:
 
How about, I can make unsupported bald statements too, highlighted in bold and underline:

A universe existing under theism is wishful thinking by brainwashed people who can't find their own meaning in life

By chance or design

You pick
 
Atheism doesn't purport to provide answers to any questions other than one: Do you believe that a god exists. It is the lack of a belief in one thing that is not supported by credible or relevant evidence.

Atheism does not support answers because they can't answer things that Theism can with facts and logic
 
Atheism does not support answers because they can't answer things that Theism can with facts and logic

Let's see you attempt to support that claim without resorting to religious dogma, speculation, unsupported claims and logical fallacies.
 
Im not reading those sources

Well, I have read some them this poster has put out and I can guarantee you every one of them is because someone does not understand, not because they are truly contradictions or errors...in other words...lies...
 
Let's see you attempt to support that claim without resorting to religious dogma, speculation, unsupported claims and logical fallacies.

First, make a claim about atheism or God and I will prove why it is irritional
 
Well, I have read some them this poster has put out and I can guarantee you every one of them is because someone does not understand, not because they are truly contradictions or errors...in other words...lies...

Well of course they are, Aheists want tom see any potential lie on the Bible without looking at the context and say it is an error
 
First, make a claim about atheism or God and I will prove why it is irritional

Most atheists do not believe in god because of a lack of objective and tangible evidence for any god.
 
He's a show and tell kinda guy...you know, grade school...

LOL thanks,us christians need to stick together, there is a **** ton of atheists here

which is fine, but it is our duty to protect Christ
 
LOL thanks,us christians need to stick together, there is a **** ton of atheists here

which is fine, but it is our duty to protect Christ

Well, some may not agree with you...I am a Jehovah's Witness, which some here do not consider a Christian at all but that's ok...thank goodness Jehovah God is my judge and not them...
 
Most atheists do not believe in god because of a lack of objective and tangible evidence for any god.

But atheists do not believe in objective evidence

They believe that objective morals,truth, good or bad, or anything that is true

So why say that there is no objective evidence for God when nothing is true or can be proved in the first place

Oh and btw, god is real:)

YouTube
 
But atheists do not believe in objective evidence

They believe that objective morals,truth, good or bad, or anything that is true

So why say that there is no objective evidence for God when nothing is true or can be proved in the first place

Oh and btw, god is real:)

YouTube

Please show where 'atheists don't believe in objective evidence'

You do know that evidence is different that morals, truth/good/bad, etc etc etc, don't you?

So, you are doing logical fallacy after logical fallacy, such as building a straw man, and false equivalency. And, argument from youtube is just not very convincing at all.
 
Well, some may not agree with you...I am a Jehovah's Witness, which some here do not consider a Christian at all but that's ok...thank goodness Jehovah God is my judge and not them...

I think it's Christian, or certainly based on the Abrahamic God:)
 
Please show where 'atheists don't believe in objective evidence'

You do know that evidence is different that morals, truth/good/bad, etc etc etc, don't you?

So, you are doing logical fallacy after logical fallacy, such as building a straw man, and false equivalency. And, argument from youtube is just not very convincing at all.

YIKES!!

If objective morals do not exist than objective evil can not exist, so down goes the evil argument.

If objective morals do not exist than objective truth about it can not exist, or any truth

See how it all falls down
 
I think it's Christian, or certainly based on the Abrahamic God:)

Absolutely it is...we also strive to follow the Christian Greek Scriptures as closely as possible...
 
Back
Top Bottom