• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Something to think about

JustHanging said:
...
Surviving texts say that Jews in Egypt couldn't be physically distinguished from the rest of Egypt's population around Jesus' time.
[/I]
Click to expand...

Just that statement should give you an insite to the writers of that text.
There were countless races in Egypt/
an interesting note is that while many are mixed, the Mummies have European DNA.

Also, nothing in your statement mentions the Europeans, the major force, military and political, in the region.
 
Last edited:
RAMOSS said:
However, we know his family history, allegedly, on mary's side. Mary was a levite, and there were very strict marriage rules for them.
Click to expand...


Mary Was Not a Levite. Tribal affiliation in ancient Israel was through the male line. Since Mary’s father was of the tribe of Judah, Mary would have been from the tribe of Judah and so also Jesus, fulfilling many prophecies.
 
Yasureoktoo said:
Mary Was Not a Levite. Tribal affiliation in ancient Israel was through the male line. Since Mary’s father was of the tribe of Judah, Mary would have been from the tribe of Judah and so also Jesus, fulfilling many prophecies.
Click to expand...

Show that to be true.
 
Yasureoktoo said:
Just that statement should give you an insite to the writers of that text.
There were countless races in Egypt/
an interesting note is that while many are mixed, the Mummies have European DNA.

Also, nothing in your statement mentions the Europeans, the major force, military and political, in the region.
Click to expand...

I'm going with the qualified researcher on this one Yasure. As she said, Jews usually married among themselves. Do you have any evidence that Mary's lineage includes non-Jews?
 
EnigmaO01 said:
although I can hear the excuses and but, but, but, already.

eOks0HYl.jpg
Click to expand...

Court order of separation.
 
JustHanging said:
I'm going with the qualified researcher on this one Yasure.
Click to expand...

Just pick whichever one you want, there are lots of them.

The reality is that nobody knows, and there is little written evidence.
 
RAMOSS said:
Show that to be true.
Click to expand...

Proof... not hardly, there is none they even existed at all.

However you can type in, "was Mary a Levite"
 
Yasureoktoo said:
Just pick whichever one you want, there are lots of them.

The reality is that nobody knows, and there is little written evidence.
Click to expand...

Not exactly. But they have a good idea of what the typical Jew looked like. So why not go with that?
 
Yasureoktoo said:
Proof... not hardly, there is none they even existed at all.

However you can type in, "was Mary a Levite"
Click to expand...

In other words, you can't show that Mary's father was from the house of Judah. Ok. Got you. On the other hand, we know her cousin was a levite, according to the bible.
 
......
 
RAMOSS said:
In other words, you can't show that Mary's father was from the house of Judah. Ok. Got you. On the other hand, we know her cousin was a levite, according to the bible.
Click to expand...

You don't need other words, I made it very clear, there is no proof.
 
RAMOSS said:
In other words, you can't show that Mary's father was from the house of Judah. Ok. Got you. On the other hand, we know her cousin was a levite, according to the bible.
Click to expand...

You're referring to Elisabeth, correct?
 
DarkWizard12 said:
and WHO were these barbarians, exactly? can you name them for us? go on.....
Click to expand...

"Barbarian" was the Roman term for non Romans.

barbarian (n.)

early 15c., in reference to classical history, "a non-Roman or non-Greek," earlier barbar (late 14c.) "non-Roman or non-Greek person; non-Christian; person speaking a language different from one's own," from Medieval Latin barbarinus (source of Old French barbarin "Berber, pagan, Saracen, barbarian"), from Latin barbarus "strange, foreign, barbarous," from Greek barbaros "foreign, strange; ignorant," from PIE root *barbar- echoic of unintelligible speech of foreigners (compare Sanskrit barbara- "stammering," also "non-Aryan," Latin balbus "stammering," Czech blblati "to stammer").
Click to expand...
 
JustHanging said:
The Qu'ran says you're wrong:

Mary - Sister of Aaron
In 19:27-28, Mary was clearly being reminded of her association with great patriarchs such as Prophet Aaron (pbuh) who according to Jewish sources, was considered the first High Priest of the Israelites and through whom the priestly decendancy of his tribe, the Levites continued.
Click to expand...

LOLOL

The Qur'an is not a reference or proof, of anything.
Islam was plagiarized from Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, and Greek Medical. it has no history of it's own.
 
JustHanging said:
Not exactly. But they have a good idea of what the typical Jew looked like. So why not go with that?
Click to expand...

No they did not, they even said like Egypt.

Jews went from the Nile to the Eurphrates, and covered many races.
 
JustHanging said:
Jesus definitely would have qualified as non-Roman, so was one of the barbarians eh.
Click to expand...

According to the Romans, yes. Moreover, he was a Jew, which made him of even lower status. Jews have been persecuted since Jesus' time. That's just mind boggling.
 
Yasureoktoo said:
LOLOL

The Qur'an is not a reference or proof, of anything.
Islam was plagiarized from Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, and Greek Medical. it has no history of it's own.
Click to expand...

What?

The Qu'ran could be an all knowing god's word. So it would be guaranteed correct. Or do you think you know more than an all-knowing being?
 
JustHanging said:
So was Christianity. What's your point?
Click to expand...

The point is that it is not reference, Regardless how accurate Christianity is, the info was taken from them and altered.
 
Yasureoktoo said:
No they did not, they even said like Egypt.

Jews went from the Nile to the Eurphrates, and covered many races.
Click to expand...

I'm going with the qualified researcher. You go with what you want. ;)
 
JustHanging said:
I'm going with the qualified researcher. You go with what you want. ;)
Click to expand...

As I said, please do, there are qualified researchers with lots of different opinions.
We do know they are pulling mummies from the ground with European DNA, regardless what your favorite researcher says.
If he does not confirm this fact, he is probably not the researcher you want to blindly follow.
 
Last edited:
EnigmaO01 said:
although I can hear the excuses and but, but, but, already.

eOks0HYl.jpg
Click to expand...

Actually they are depicted in a much more sanitary and safe environment than Joseph, Mary and Jesus had to endure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom