• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Proof God Exists: Here is my 11-Step Logical Proof. Enjoy.

Mashmont said:
Thanks for making my point with your graph. lol. I'm guessing you still don't know you did.
Click to expand...

I know what I did Im guessing you didnt actually read the graph and thought AHA! Mash fianlly got his firtst victory at DP and in life
You didnt you lost. Try actually reading for a change

Or you can remain deluded while everyone else laughs at you
 
Quag said:
I know what I did Im guessing you didnt actually read the graph and thought AHA! Mash fianlly got his firtst victory at DP and in life
You didnt you lost. Try actually reading for a change

Or you can remain deluded while everyone else laughs at you
Click to expand...

He seems happy with the second option.
 
Quag said:
I know what I did Im guessing you didnt actually read the graph and thought AHA! Mash fianlly got his firtst victory at DP and in life
You didnt you lost. Try actually reading for a change

Or you can remain deluded while everyone else laughs at you
Click to expand...

Yep. Looks like it's runnin' about 90% nutsos. Thanks for the back up. lol.
 
Mashmont said:
Ladies and gentlemen, a couple of years ago, I devised a logical proof God exists. It is based on the Good Fruits argument, using canonized saints of the Catholic Church, who are universally recognized as great people because they lived among the people they served, and usually endured harsh situations at some point in life. All had strong prayer lives, and daily prayer interaction with God. There are a few postulates which must be accepted on their face. Here is my proof. I hope it will lead a few atheists to conversion back to God.

1. Postulate #1: A wise person is a good (virtuous) person and a good person is a wise person.
2. Postulate #2: If a person is good (virtuous) in one area, he is good across the board.
3 Therefore, if a person is wise in one area, he is wise across the board.
4. Postulate: #3 Wisdom is Truth.
5 Postulate #4: A canonized saint of the Catholic Church is a person who is universally recognized by the majority to have been a very good person in life.
6 Postulate #5: Canonized saints by definition, were very devout believers in God.
7 Since canonized saints are universally recognized as very good people, then by postulate #1, they are very wise people.
8. Since canonized saints are very wise people, by Postulate #2, they are very wise people in all areas, across the board.
9 Therefore, it is very wise to believe in God, since canonized saints were devout believers in God.
10. And since wisdom is truth by Postulate #3 believing in God is wise and therefore the truth
11. Therefore it is true God exists.
Click to expand...

You should really refrain from trying to reference or utilize the term 'logical' if you're going to base your entire argument on false premises and bare assertion fallacies.

You can regurgitate the term "Postulate" as much as you'd like, and spout nonsense that 'saints are universally recognized as very good people', but it won't change the reality that you apparently got ahold of a Logic 101 textbook and didn't understand it.
 
Mashmont said:
Yep. Looks like it's runnin' about 90% nutsos. Thanks for the back up. lol.
Click to expand...

So you went for option B
congrats you lost another debate with your illiteracy

Suck to be you, thank God I am not
 
Mashmont claims to have made converts here but will not name them. I wonder why he made such a patently untrue claim?
 
zyzygy said:
Mashmont claims to have made converts here but will not name them. I wonder why he made such a patently untrue claim?
Click to expand...

Why does he make any claims? they are all patently untrue
 
Tanngrisnir said:
You should really refrain from trying to reference or utilize the term 'logical' if you're going to base your entire argument on false premises and bare assertion fallacies.

You can regurgitate the term "Postulate" as much as you'd like, and spout nonsense that 'saints are universally recognized as very good people', but it won't change the reality that you apparently got ahold of a Logic 101 textbook and didn't understand it.
Click to expand...

Know what's cool? Two months and 840 posts later, my proof thread is still going strong. Truth perseveres. Thanks for weighing in. Hope this proof helps you as it has many others.
 
Quag said:
Just to prove you right he confirmed that with his next post
Click to expand...

OK, well would you like to count up the number of conservatives who have weighed in on this thread vs the number of leftwing nutsos? 90% might be selling you guys short.
 
Mashmont said:
OK, well would you like to count up the number of conservatives who have weighed in on this thread vs the number of leftwing nutsos? 90% might be selling you guys short.
Click to expand...

You already lost this debate, there is no need for you to keep digging
 
Quag said:
You already lost this debate, there is no need for you to keep digging
Click to expand...

It's amusing. When right-wingers are painted into a corner then their Pavlovian response is to post nonsense about left-wingers. Still no names of converts. He painted himself into a very small corner.
 
zyzygy said:
It's amusing. When right-wingers are painted into a corner then their Pavlovian response is to post nonsense about left-wingers. Still no names of converts. He painted himself into a very small corner.
Click to expand...

And no comprehension that the link proved him wrong
But then he didnt or couldnt read it
 
Quag said:
And no comprehension that the link proved him wrong
But then he didnt or couldnt read it
Click to expand...

He must be amusing himself, he can't really believe the nonsense that he posts.
 
Quag said:
You already lost this debate, there is no need for you to keep digging
Click to expand...

Um. It looks like I just won the debate. Better start counting. lol.
 
zyzygy said:
He must be amusing himself, he can't really believe the nonsense that he posts.
Click to expand...

Of course he doenst he is here because he hates christianity and wants to make it and its adherents look bad.
 
Quag said:
Of course he doenst he is here because he hates christianity and wants to make it and its adherents look bad.
Click to expand...

After your last atheist screed, this line is looking pretty ridiculous by now. Don't you think?
 
Mashmont said:
After your last atheist screed, this line is looking pretty ridiculous by now. Don't you think?
Click to expand...

You have looked ridiculous since the moment you got here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom