Carry on...i was simply trying to save you some time/trouble of responding to someone who will more than likely not answer...Ok. There's an entire forum of individuals that are free to comment.... or not.
Is that permissible to you?
Carry on...i was simply trying to save you some time/trouble of responding to someone who will more than likely not answer...Ok. There's an entire forum of individuals that are free to comment.... or not.
Is that permissible to you?
Logical proof is a different animal than actual proof. The premises and conclusion don't have to be true for it to be a valid argument.You haven't explained anything. A or ~A =/= A. Sorry. If you don't understand, brush up on your math.
There is no proof for gods. The idea itself is a logical error. It assumes that what can exist in the mind necessarily exists in reality. The proof is a mess.
Belief trumps every evidence, right?Logical proof is a different animal than actual proof. The premises and conclusion don't have to be true for it to be a valid argument.
'Lack' of every "evidence", also, for some.Belief trumps every evidence, right?
Evidence is necessary to formulating belief. Blind faith is risky regarding some matters.Belief trumps every evidence, right?
For certain theists, it sure seems to.Belief trumps every evidence, right?
Belief is the go to for when there is no evidence.Evidence is necessary to formulating belief. Blind faith is risky regarding some matters.
Wrong...evidence is required in order to have faith...For certain theists, it sure seems to.
Belief is the go to for when there is no evidence.
More like the exact opposite.Wrong...evidence is required in order to have faith...
Well, I can tell ya'...I did not believe until I saw for myself that there was/is enough evidence for Jehovah God, to put my faith in Him...More like the exact opposite.
We have different ideas of what constitutes "evidence."Well, I can tell ya'...I did not believe until I saw for myself that there was/is enough evidence for Jehovah God, to put my faith in Him...
Wrong...evidence is required in order to have faith...
No, it's not...Faith is belief in spite of evidence.
In other words, wishful thinking.No, it's not...
“Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” Hebrews 11:1
No, it's not...
“Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” Hebrews 11:1
We have different ideas of what constitutes "evidence."
Belief is irrelevant. It's about the evidence. There is no objective evidence for god/s.Of you do because it's obvious you don't believe in God.