manofknowledge
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2018
- Messages
- 915
- Reaction score
- 249
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Full of quantum foam.
Perhaps. No one knows.
Full of quantum foam.
Not if my perspective is at a quantum scale. In that case, a table is mostly void space.
If the naturalist is fully clothed against his wishes, it will eventually impact his approach to reality. If he is allowed to his freedom to be unclothed wherever he wants, he is likely to immediately impact the approach to reality of others who are not naturalists.
Did that help raise the level of this existential debate?
Geez, At least I stayed on the topic of naturalists!If a man decides on killing himself by jumping off a tall building...but changes his mind on the way down.
Is it still suicide?
Geez, At least I stayed on the topic of naturalists!
In that case his intent before he took off his clothes extends past the moment he could reach for them easily several feet away while playing sand volleyball. Similarly his intent before he jumped to commit suicide, extends to when he landed.Sorry, I forgot to mention he was naked.
...similarly his intent before he jumped to commit suicide, extends to when he landed.
That make up a table.
There are no tables at a quantum scale. Nor are there tables at a cosmic scale. People have this narrow belief that reality consists of what they perceive but human perception is very limited and doesn't even account for things that can be perceived but are not, much less things that cannot be perceived at all.
OK so a table is made up of atoms.
What's your point?
My point is you make assumptions about reality that fall apart if you change the scale of observation. It doesn't address a reality that goes beyond human perception, yet we know we only perceive a infinitesimal bit of any objective reality.
My point is you make assumptions about reality that fall apart if you change the scale of observation. It doesn't address a reality that goes beyond human perception, yet we know we only perceive a infinitesimal bit of any objective reality.
My point is you make assumptions about reality that fall apart if you change the scale of observation. It doesn't address a reality that goes beyond human perception, yet we know we only perceive a infinitesimal bit of any objective reality.
OK what observations about reality are manifestly wrong when you delve into the world of quantum physics?
If we can't perceive it then how do you know that it is there?
Since I assume that you are human, how is it that you know what is beyond human perception?
That is exactly the point. We don't.
But you said that it was there.
I said we don't know the entirety of reality. There are many examples of indications we aren't aware of much of reality. Dark Matter is one example. The origin or nature of Gravity is another.
Gravity is the distortion of spacetime and we know that dark matter exists because we can detect its effects.
First quantum physics is a theory. We cannot observe that world directly or perceive it in any way. There are no tables at that scale. In fact according to the latest thinking, matter doesn't exist either. You have a reality of pure energy that might result in multiple dimensions when zoomed out to our scale of perception.
I'm awre of quantum physics, who says there is no matter just energy?