- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 23,086
- Reaction score
- 2,375
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Ravi Zacharias doesn't understand the Problem of Evil, there are so many questions begged. First of all, he assumes his framework of a "moral law" as a deontological framework for ethics as the only valid foundation for ethics. This is an entirely separate debate, but Ravi just scores the point in his favor in order to assert his other point. If there is some kind of deontological moral law, that requires a moral law giver. You see how we can without evidence, merely climb a ladder of words to see the most remarkable things. Logic alone is insufficient, especially with fallaciously employed.
He then wonders how the atheist, who thinks must certainly have no moral law (lets say morality) should have no objection or judgement of god because they have no vantage place to start from ethically. EVEN if there were true, which it isn't, it still doesn't understand the particular realm of the issue of the Problem of Evil, which is that it is in particular an INTERNAL CRITIQUE (as mentioned in the OP) of a Benevolent form of Theism. Which is that it kind of adopts the worldview for the sake of the argument, to evaluate if it can be coherent.
Let's take another example, there was a recent story I heard on the Unbelieveable? Podcast which told the story of this Australian doctor who claims he was raised from the dead by Jesus. Let's grant that it was a miracle, he was raised from the dead. Yet, god is also omniscient, there are billions of people who go into cardiac arrest and that people are desperately praying for who do not get this miracle. Tragically my wife's best friend who just lost a young infant 2 years ago, have another boy who is at 5 months effectively vegetative for life after experiencing SIDS. There was such an outpouring of prayer from the church community that they were apart of, to heal the brain, but it was almost completely destroyed to the brain stem. In a world full of billions and billions of stories like that, the fact that god can intervene into the "evil" of the world to save one person, must necessitate that he is also passing over many many more people. Is it because some people believe and some don't? Is it totally random? Is it for some divine plan?
Such is the incoherence of a good god with an evil world, which doesn't mean that atheism is true, it just means that the evidence stands against a benevolent god to a significant degree when one take into account the suffering of creation.
God has set the life of man at 70 years, a little more if he is strong (Psalm 90:10). There's all kinds of reasons why more people aren't healed and their prayers are unanswered. Here's just five:
5 Reasons Why God Isn't Answering Your Prayers
And there's more.
By the way, Dr. Craig Keener's voluminous two-volume work on Miracles has hundreds and hundreds of documented miracles and healings, a good number with medical documentation before and after.
https://www.amazon.com/Miracles-Credibility-New-Testament-Accounts/dp/0801039525
As for Ravi Zacharias and evil, I think he understands it and free will quite well.
Last edited: