• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does God Approve of Gays?

Which outlined the religious "trickster" character which undermined the competing religious snakes cults which were prevalent throughout the Fertile Crescent.


OM

lol...attempting to intertwine God's Word with paganism...:failpail:
 
lol...attempting to intertwine God's Word with paganism...:failpail:

Which is where the tale originated, absolutely. Those who borrowed the tale, betrayed the context, then declared it "God's Word" (God remains strangely silent on the subject) do not in any way change this foundation.


OM
 
Which is where the tale originated, absolutely. Those who borrowed the tale, betrayed the context, then declared it "God's Word" (God remains strangely silent on the subject) do not in any way change this foundation.


OM

It is not a tale...that was your 1st mistake...
 
Assuming, a god exists, he likely doesn't care about petty human concerns.

Remember, he's on omnipotent being. Try to wrap you head around that concept.

Do you really think he spends his entire existence concerned over the actions of humans, when he has an entire universe to deal with?

Relative to a being of that power, humans are essentially gnats.

Do you concern yourself over the lives of gnats? Nope.

And an Omnipotent being likely doesn't concern himself about you or the other gnats, ...er I mean humans on the planet

I don't know man, if gnats developed a sense of self awareness, learned to make things like music, art, and took reproduction from a base thing to an emotional connection. I might concern myself with the lives of gnats. That's probably all I would do, create habitats for all my little gnats and watch them like soap operas. What's the alternative? Watch rocks smash together for the next couple billion years til I get some different gnats?

Everything about our existence screams reality game show. Think about evolution. It's all about who can adapt to different situations. Think about how in an infinite universe, we all fight wars over dumb **** like salt. Just think about how we built a society based on monogamy, and then basically rejected monogamy in practice.

You telling me, if the gnats in your apartment were not in the middle of a blood feud because a neighboring gnat boy got their daughter pregnant and they turn out to be second cousins, you telling me, you wouldn't watch that with popcorn?

Well, you got better taste in entertainment than I, if that's the case.
 
It is not a tale...that was your 1st mistake...

Believing that humans first existed in a magic garden 6000 years ago and were deceived by a talking snake would not be my folly.


OM
 
Believing that humans first existed in a magic garden 6000 years ago and were deceived by a talking snake would not be my folly.


OM

No more folly than believing everything is a myth...btw, there was no talkin' snake, now you're talkin' crazy...:2razz:
 
Actually, yes...CB is right, you are wrong...Genesis makes it obvious who the serpent was by giving us the very 1st prophecy in the Bible, putting enmity between God's seed and Satan's seed, the very one that all other prophecies are based on...

"And I will put enmity between you and the woman and between your offspring and her offspring. He will crush your head, and you will strike* him in the heel.” Genesis 3:15

And , from the words quoted that has nothing to do with satan what so ever.
 
And , from the words quoted that has nothing to do with satan what so ever.

Right, God was seeking vengeance against a measley snake...now, what's wrong with that picture? lol...
 
No more folly than believing everything is a myth...btw, there was no talkin' snake, now you're talkin' crazy...:2razz:

Not everything is a myth; only myths are myths.


OM
 
Not all of it, anyway; but some of it nonetheless.


OM

Jesus' parables, yes...they were illustrative teachings...even visions, dreams, and other prophecies were of events yet to come...God's Word is Truth...John 17:17...
 
Does God Approve of Gays?

Even if there is a God ... who cares if He approves?

A more pertinent question would be; Does God approve of His wicked priests that molest children, or look the other way regarding chronic adultery and lies?
 
Jesus' parables, yes...they were illustrative teachings...even visions, dreams, and other prophecies were of events yet to come...God's Word is Truth...John 17:17...

Not to mention the Pentateuch.


OM
 
Does God Approve of Gays?

Even if there is a God ... who cares if He approves?

A more pertinent question would be; Does God approve of His wicked priests that molest children, or look the other way regarding chronic adultery and lies?

Wait, wait, wait...so the sins you approve of are the ones that God needs to approve of? What is it that makes you think that God looks the other way on adultery and lies? The other day I posted something about a gay Episcopal Bishop who left his wife for a guy. Was that adultery or is it okay because he is gay? Any more selective outrage you want to tell us all about?
 
Right, God was seeking vengeance against a measley snake...now, what's wrong with that picture? lol...

It is a just so story to explain why snakes have no legs, and why a lot of people freak out about them.
 
It is a just so story to explain why snakes have no legs, and why a lot of people freak out about them.

Um no, Jehovah's referring to how the snake lives was symbolic of how Satan's standing with Him would be from that point on...
 
Um no, Jehovah's referring to how the snake lives was symbolic of how Satan's standing with Him would be from that point on...

Was a religious trickster designed by monotheists to undermine the sheer prevalence of the major competing religion of the area and time, then was borrowed and reduced to writing to instill a sense of national religious identity in the face of almost-certain cultural assimilation. Then, hundreds of years later, it suddenly became "Satan".


OM
 
Was a religious trickster designed by monotheists to undermine the sheer prevalence of the major competing religion of the area and time, then was borrowed and reduced to writing to instill a sense of national religious identity in the face of almost-certain cultural assimilation. Then, hundreds of years later, it suddenly became "Satan".


OM

It's always been Satan...
 
Um no, Jehovah's referring to how the snake lives was symbolic of how Satan's standing with Him would be from that point on...

Where does it say 'satan' in the text?
 
It's always been Satan...

...only since the messianic authors insisted as such; but not before. My teacher was much more authoritative on the subject than yours.


OM
 
Back
Top Bottom