• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Trinity of Absurd

Status
Not open for further replies.
NWO_Spook said:
Wow! I rarely see such overt thread derailing as on the first two pages.
Click to expand...

A thread about condemning Christians & Christianity NOT derailed . . in three posts, would be a strange occurrence !

Wouldn't it ?
 
LittleNipper said:
Funny, if a liberal cheats on his wife his fellow liberals defend by saying, "What the man does on his own time is his own business." But if a conservative makes a personal mistake, suddenly all the liberals become sanctimonious."
Click to expand...

That is how things are today.

Expect it. Liberals are hypocrites too... I didn't need to tell you that I hope LOL
 
calamity said:
1. Adam was not created whole from dust. Eve certainly did not derive from his rib. Man doesn't now suffer in childbirth, find himself forced to toil or experience death only because Eve ate an apple. Believing otherwise is stupid. Hence, the myth is total bull****.
Click to expand...

It is simply a creation myth-one of many and it is obviously so. Were these individuals representative of early hominids? Neanderthals? Homo Sapiens Sapiens? Who was around to note the story and how many generations did it pass through orally before being written down? One simply has to ask a few simply questions to demolish the myth, that is, if one was silly enough to take it literally in the first place.

2. There is no evidence of a global flood during man's time on earth. There is no way that a single pair of all the creatures on earth could be place on a boat. Besides, the genetic markers found in DNA prove, without doubt, that this myth is total bull****.
Click to expand...

Of course it is a silly story and science has put this one to bed.

3. Virgins are not impregnated by gods to then deliver their babies. Thinking they do is absurd. Clearly the Christ myth is total bull****.
Click to expand...

This is possibly a 'cover story' for a sexual assault, which renders the Bethlehem journey, or even the 'flight' into Egypt more believable. The census story is implausible, and the massacre of the children is also quite specious.
 
NWO_Spook said:
Thread derailing is against the rules is it not?
Click to expand...

I don't know, but I doubt it. Threads can get so easily derailed.

It's up to members to try to guide it back to topic and that's not always successful LOL
 
NWO_Spook said:
It is simply a creation myth-one of many and it is obviously so. Were these individuals representative of early hominids? Neanderthals? Homo Sapiens Sapiens? Who was around to note the story and how many generations did it pass through orally before being written down? One simply has to ask a few simply questions to demolish the myth, that is, if one was silly enough to take it literally in the first place.



Of course it is a silly story and science has put this one to bed.



This is possibly a 'cover story' for a sexual assault, which renders the Bethlehem journey, or even the 'flight' into Egypt more believable. The census story is implausible, and the massacre of the children is also quite specious.
Click to expand...

WELL! Let me ask you a simple question. If man wasn't made from the dust, then just where did living biological matter originate from? The fact of GOD suddenly doesn't seem so far fetched ----- unlike some shortsighted theories...
 
LittleNipper said:
WELL! Let me ask you a simple question. If man wasn't made from the dust, then just where did living biological matter originate from?
Click to expand...

From the elements required to create life. If our culture didn't have gods as a hangover from primitive times, would we even consider a supernatural being as responsible?

The fact of GOD suddenly doesn't seem so far fetched ----- unlike some shortsighted theories...
Click to expand...

To me, it seems a rather primitive conclusion and in itself, quite irrational. Why do we still need gods to explain what we don't know? We, as a species once believed gods were responsible for everything from the sun coming up to food going missing in the pantry. Eventually, science, through observation and experimentation dispelled almost all of these conclusions, yet we still need gods to explain the origin of nature itself? I see a scientific process as a far more plausible answer to the question, even if it is unknown at this point in time.
 
LittleNipper said:
Funny, if a liberal cheats on his wife his fellow liberals defend by saying, "What the man does on his own time is his own business." But if a conservative makes a personal mistake, suddenly all the liberals become sanctimonious."
Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:
Please do not necro old & inactive threads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom