• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was Christianity influenced more by Greek philosophy than by Jewish theology?

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
17,873
Reaction score
8,362
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
Was Christianity influenced more by Greek philosophy than by Jewish theology?

There are those weird academic types whose works I read, who present what I see as a strong argument for Greco-Roman philosophy being a larger factor in the creation of Christianity than is generally understood today.

for example, Prof. G.J. Riley in Mimesis and Intertextuality in Antiquity and Christianity (pp. 91-103). Harrisburg, Pa: Trinity Press International (2001)
It was the appeal of the early Church to the wider Greco-Roman society that fueled its rise, and that appeal was very much a result of its success in modeling the ideals of the culture as a whole. The early Christians imitated and copied the fundamental values found in the literature and stories of its wider culture as it formed its self-image and presented itself to the world. [pg 91]

Greek-speaking Christians defended the use of classical literature as foundational for good character, ethical behavior, and a proper education, well into the fourth century and beyond. Christians in antiquity never developed their own school texts to replace the classics until forced to do so by Emperor Julian in the mid-fourth century. Christians raided the classical tradition for its good ideas and then condemned pagan authors for their immoral myths. [pg 93]

Christianity took hold in the empire as no foreign cult could (for example, Judaism, the Isis cult, and Mithraism) precisely because it was not foreign, but an expression and imitation of the best the empire had to offer. [pg 103]

One early example of a Church Father using Greek stories to illustrate what he saw as the appeal of Christianity is Justin Martyr in his Second Apology
Hercules, says Xenophon, coming to a place where three ways met, found Virtue and Vice, who appeared to him in the form of women: Vice, in a luxurious dress, and with a seductive expression rendered blooming by such ornaments, and her eyes of a quickly melting tenderness, said to Hercules that if he would follow her, she would always enable him to pass his life in pleasure and adorned with the most graceful ornaments, such as were then upon her own person; and Virtue, who was of squalid look and dress, said, But if you obey me, you shall adorn yourself not with ornament nor beauty that passes away and perishes, but with everlasting and precious graces.

And we are persuaded that every one who flees those things that seem to be good, and follows hard after what are reckoned difficult and strange, enters into blessedness.

For Vice, when by imitation of what is incorruptible (for what is really incorruptible she neither has nor can produce) she has thrown around her own actions, as a disguise, the properties of Virtue, and qualities which are really excellent, leads captive earthly-minded men, attaching to Virtue her own evil properties. But those who understood the excellences which belong to that which is real, are also uncorrupt in virtue.

And this every sensible person ought to think both of Christians and of the athletes, and of those who did what the poets relate of the so-called gods, concluding as much from our contempt of death, even when it could be escaped.

For I myself, too, when I was delighting in the doctrines of Plato, and heard the Christians slandered, and saw them fearless of death, and of all other things which are counted fearful, perceived that it was impossible that they could be living in wickedness and pleasure.
 
Was Christianity influenced more by Greek philosophy than by Jewish theology?

There are those weird academic types whose works I read, who present what I see as a strong argument for Greco-Roman philosophy being a larger factor in the creation of Christianity than is generally understood today.

for example, Prof. G.J. Riley in Mimesis and Intertextuality in Antiquity and Christianity (pp. 91-103). Harrisburg, Pa: Trinity Press International (2001)


One early example of a Church Father using Greek stories to illustrate what he saw as the appeal of Christianity is Justin Martyr in his Second Apology

That is something that I thought for years. There are many Christians concepts that if they take an element from Judaism, there is a Hellenistic twist to it. Other areas show a strong Roman influence.
 
Greek Philosophy​—Did It Enrich Christianity?

“Christianity, though hostile to pagan Greek and Roman culture, in fact absorbed much classical philosophy.”​—The Encyclopedia Americana.

AMONG those who had a definitive influence on “Christian” thought, “Saint” Augustine holds an undisputed position. According to The New Encyclopædia Britannica, Augustine’s “mind was the crucible in which the religion of the New Testament was most completely fused with the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy; and it was also the means by which the product of this fusion was transmitted to the Christendoms of medieval Roman Catholicism and Renaissance Protestantism.”

Augustine’s legacy is indeed enduring. Speaking of the extent to which Greek philosophy has influenced Christendom, Douglas T. Holden stated: “Christian theology has become so fused with Greek philosophy that it has reared individuals who are a mixture of nine parts Greek thought to one part Christian thought.”

Some scholars strongly believe that such philosophical influence enhanced Christianity in its infancy, enriched its teaching, and made it more convincing. Was this the case? How and when did the influence of Greek philosophy take place? Did it, in fact, enrich or did it pollute Christianity?

It is enlightening to trace a number of developments from the third century B.C.E. to the fifth century C.E. through an examination of four strange terms: (1) “Hellenized Judaism,” (2) “Christianized Hellenism,” (3) “Hellenized Christianity,” and (4) “Christian philosophy.”

“Hellenized Judaism”

The first, “Hellenized Judaism,” is truly a contradiction. The original religion of the Hebrews, which was instituted by the true God, Jehovah, was not to be contaminated with false religious ideas. (Deuteronomy 12:32; Proverbs 30:5, 6) Right from the start, however, purity of worship came under threat of corruption by the false religious practices and thinking that surrounded it​—such as the influence from Egyptian, Canaanite, and Babylonian sources. Sad to say, Israel allowed its true worship to become deeply corrupted.​—Judges 2:11-13.

Centuries later, when ancient Palestine became part of the Greek Empire under Alexander the Great in the fourth century B.C.E., this corruption plumbed new depths and left behind a lasting and corrosive legacy. Alexander recruited Jews into his army. The contacts between the Jews and their new conqueror deeply influenced Jewish religious thinking. Judaistic education was penetrated by Hellenistic thought. High Priest Jason is reputed to have established a Greek academy in Jerusalem in 175 B.C.E. to promote the study of Homer.

Interestingly, a Samaritan, writing in the second half of the second century B.C.E., sought to present Bible history as Hellenized historiography. Apocryphal Jewish books, such as Judith and Tobit, actually allude to Greek erotic legends. A number of Jewish philosophers appeared who attempted to reconcile Greek thought with the Jewish religion and the Bible.

The figure that is most credited with this is Philo, a Jew of the first century C.E. He appropriated the doctrines of Plato (fourth century B.C.E.), the Pythagoreans, and the Stoics. Jews were profoundly influenced by Philo’s views. Summing up this intellectual infiltration of Greek thought into Jewish culture, Jewish author Max Dimont says: “Enriched with Platonic thought, Aristotelian logic, and Euclidian science, Jewish scholars approached the Torah with new tools. . . . They proceeded to add Greek reason to Jewish revelation.”

In time, the Romans absorbed the Greek Empire, taking over Jerusalem. This opened the way for even more significant changes. By the third century C.E., the philosophical and religious doctrines of thinkers who endeavored to develop and synthesize the ideas of Plato took their definitive form, known collectively today as Neoplatonism. This school of thought was bound to have a profound influence on apostate Christianity.

Greek Philosophy—Did It Enrich Christianity? — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
 
“Christianized Hellenism”

During the first five centuries of our common era, certain intellectuals sought to demonstrate a relationship between Greek philosophy and the revealed truth of the Bible. The book A History of Christianity states: “Christian metaphysicians were to portray the Greeks in the decades before Christ as struggling manfully but blindly towards a knowledge of God, trying, as it were, to conjure up Jesus out of the thin Athenian air, to invent Christianity out of their poor pagan heads.”

Plotinus (205-270 C.E.), a precursor of such thinkers, developed a system that was based chiefly on Plato’s theory of ideas. Plotinus introduced the concept of a soul separate from the body. Professor E. W. Hopkins said of Plotinus: “His theology . . . had no little influence upon the leaders of Christian opinion.”
“Hellenized Christianity” and “Christian Philosophy”

Starting in the second century C.E., “Christian” thinkers made a determined effort to reach the pagan intellectuals. Despite the apostle Paul’s clear warning against “the empty speeches that violate what is holy” and “the contradictions of the falsely called ‘knowledge,’” such teachers integrated in their teachings philosophical elements from the surrounding Hellenistic culture. (1 Timothy 6:20) The example of Philo seemed to suggest that it might be possible to reconcile the Bible with Platonic ideas.​—Compare 2 Peter 1:16.

The real victim, of course, was Biblical truth. “Christian” teachers tried to show that Christianity was in harmony with Greco-Roman humanism. Clement of Alexandria and Origen (second and third centuries C.E.) made Neoplatonism the foundation of what came to be “Christian philosophy.” Ambrose (339-397 C.E.), bishop of Milan, had “absorbed the most up-to-date Greek learning, Christian and pagan alike​—notably the works . . . of the pagan Neoplatonist Plotinus.” He tried to provide educated Latins with a classical version of Christianity. Augustine followed suit.

A century later, Dionysius the Areopagite (also styled pseudo-Dionysius), probably a Syrian monk, tried to unite Neoplatonic philosophy with “Christian” theology. According to one encyclopedia, his “writings established a definite Neoplatonic trend in a large segment of medieval Christian doctrine and spirituality . . . that has determined facets of its religious and devotional character to the present time.” What a flagrant flouting of the apostle Paul’s warning against “the philosophy and empty deception according to the tradition of men”!​—Colossians 2:8.

Greek Philosophy—Did It Enrich Christianity? — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
 
Corrupting Pollutants

It has been noted that “the Christian Platonists gave primacy to revelation and regarded Platonic philosophy as the best available instrument for understanding and defending the teachings of Scripture and church tradition.”

Plato himself had been convinced that there exists an immortal soul. Significantly, one of the most prominent false teachings that crept into “Christian” theology is that of the immortality of the soul. Accepting this teaching can in no way be justified on the grounds that doing so made Christianity more appealing to the masses. When preaching in Athens, the very heart of Greek culture, the apostle Paul did not teach the Platonic doctrine of the soul. Rather, he preached the Christian doctrine of the resurrection, even though many of his Greek listeners found it hard to accept what he said.​—Acts 17:22-32.

Contrary to Greek philosophy, the Scriptures clearly show that the soul is not what a person has but what he is. (Genesis 2:7) At death, the soul ceases to exist. (Ezekiel 18:4) Ecclesiastes 9:5 tells us: “The living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten.” The doctrine of the immortality of the soul is not taught in the Bible.

Another deceptive teaching had to do with the position of the prehuman Jesus, the notion that he was equal to his Father. Explains the book The Church of the First Three Centuries: “The doctrine of the Trinity . . . had its origin in a source entirely foreign from that of the Jewish and Christian Scriptures.” What was that source? The doctrine “grew up, and was ingrafted on Christianity, through the hands of the Platonizing Fathers.”

Indeed, as time went by and the Church Fathers became increasingly influenced by Neoplatonism, the Trinitarians gained ground. Third-century Neoplatonic philosophy seemingly enabled them to reconcile the irreconcilable​—to make a threefold God appear like one God. By philosophical reasoning they claimed that three persons could be one God while retaining their individuality!

The truth of the Bible, however, clearly shows that Jehovah alone is Almighty God, Jesus Christ is His lesser created Son, and the holy spirit is His active force. (Deuteronomy 6:4; Isaiah 45:5; Acts 2:4; Colossians 1:15; Revelation 3:14) The Trinity doctrine dishonors the only true God and confuses people, turning them away from a God they cannot comprehend.

One more victim of the Neoplatonic influence on Christian thinking was the Scripture-based millennial hope. (Revelation 20:4-6) Origen was noted for his condemnation of millennialists. Why was he so opposed to this well-founded Biblical doctrine of Christ’s rule of one thousand years? The Catholic Encyclopedia answers: “In view of the Neo-Platonism on which his doctrines were founded . . . , [Origen] could not side with the millenarians.”

The Truth

None of the above-mentioned developments had anything to do with the truth. This truth is the entire body of Christian teachings as found in the Bible. (2 Corinthians 4:2; Titus 1:1, 14; 2 John 1-4) The Bible is the one and only source of truth.​—John 17:17; 2 Timothy 3:16.

However, the enemy of Jehovah, of truth, of humankind, and of everlasting life​—Satan the Devil, the “manslayer” and the “father of the lie”—​has used a variety of devious ways to adulterate that truth. (John 8:44; compare 2 Corinthians 11:3.) Among the most powerful tools he has used are the teachings of pagan Greek philosophers​—actually a reflection of his own thinking—​in an effort to alter the content and nature of Christian teachings.

This unnatural blending of Christian teaching with Greek philosophy is an attempt to dilute Bible truth, diminishing its strength and appeal to the meek, sincere, and teachable truth seekers. (1 Corinthians 3:1, 2, 19, 20) It also tends to defile the purity of crystal-clear Biblical doctrine, making the line between truth and falsehood appear fuzzy.

Today, under the direction of the Head of the congregation, Jesus Christ, true Christian teaching has been restored. Also, sincere seekers of truth can very easily identify the true Christian congregation by its fruits. (Matthew 7:16, 20) Jehovah’s Witnesses are willing and eager to help such ones find the unadulterated waters of truth and to assist them to get a firm hold on the inheritance of everlasting life offered by our Father, Jehovah.​—John 4:14; 1 Timothy 6:19.

Greek Philosophy—Did It Enrich Christianity? — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
 
That is something that I thought for years. There are many Christians concepts that if they take an element from Judaism, there is a Hellenistic twist to it. Other areas show a strong Roman influence.

Both Greek and Roman religions had influence but Wicca/paganism had far more, particularly in traditions...
 
Both Greek and Roman religions had influence but Wicca/paganism had far more, particularly in traditions...

Perhaps when it came to holidays, but when it comes to the theology, such as the concepts of heaven/hell/salvation/ God made flesh, etc etc etc, the influence was Greek and Roman. For example, the royal titles for Augustus were 'Son of God' (he was the adopted son of Julius, who was deified in 34 BC) , and 'Savior of the world'. Juilius was declared a god when a comet (star) appeared in the east. Sound familiar?
 
That is something that I thought for years. There are many Christians concepts that if they take an element from Judaism, there is a Hellenistic twist to it. Other areas show a strong Roman influence.

Well all these cultures were in play when Christianity was invented after all- there was nothing original about it.
 
Was Christianity influenced more by Greek philosophy than by Jewish theology?

There are those weird academic types whose works I read, who present what I see as a strong argument for Greco-Roman philosophy being a larger factor in the creation of Christianity than is generally understood today.

for example, Prof. G.J. Riley in Mimesis and Intertextuality in Antiquity and Christianity (pp. 91-103). Harrisburg, Pa: Trinity Press International (2001)


One early example of a Church Father using Greek stories to illustrate what he saw as the appeal of Christianity is Justin Martyr in his Second Apology

The Christian god is very much like Zeus, from the bearded image of him we see in that painting to the impregnation of mortal women (virgins no less) we hear about at Christmas time. That's why smart people call bull**** when told how "true" all that hocus pocus is supposed to be.
 
Perhaps when it came to holidays, but when it comes to the theology, such as the concepts of heaven/hell/salvation/ God made flesh, etc etc etc, the influence was Greek and Roman. For example, the royal titles for Augustus were 'Son of God' (he was the adopted son of Julius, who was deified in 34 BC) , and 'Savior of the world'. Juilius was declared a god when a comet (star) appeared in the east. Sound familiar?

And Augustus ascended into heaven, according to the Senate.

I would argue that Hellenistic influences are quite strong in the Christian texts ~ even the concept of the gospels being 'divinely inspired' (see Timothy) is merely an extension of the Hellenistic belief in art coming from the muse, not the author/artisan/artist.
 
Was Christianity influenced more by Greek philosophy than by Jewish theology?

There are those weird academic types whose works I read, who present what I see as a strong argument for Greco-Roman philosophy being a larger factor in the creation of Christianity than is generally understood today.

for example, Prof. G.J. Riley in Mimesis and Intertextuality in Antiquity and Christianity (pp. 91-103). Harrisburg, Pa: Trinity Press International (2001)


One early example of a Church Father using Greek stories to illustrate what he saw as the appeal of Christianity is Justin Martyr in his Second Apology

Absolutely. Where do you think Johannine literature got that whole "Logos" concept from?


OM
 
Absolutely. Where do you think Johannine literature got that whole "Logos" concept from?


OM

To be sure, the logos that the Johannie literature was taken from (modified) seem to be more aligned with Philo's concept of Logos, where he tried to meld the traditional Logos concept with some Jewish concepts. There is most definitely a strong Hellenistic influence on that, but there was some influences from Judaism, and it seems that the author of GOJ modified it further.
 
Back
Top Bottom