• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

To hell with catholic cardinals, now it is gays who are to blame for their child rape issue

Peter King

Peter King

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
29,957
Reaction score
14,683
Location
Netherlands
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
During a sex abuse gathering in the Vatican, one that I was hopeful for, has gone partly back to the same old problems of the catholic church:

- it's is not really our fault

To which I say, **** you catholic church. During the sexual abuse gathering in the Vatican this was part of the message sent out by cardinals:

“Before the drift in process, it seems that the difficulty is reduced to that of the abuse of minors, a horrible crime, especially when it is perpetrated by a priest, which is, however, only part of a much greater crisis,” the cardinals wrote. “The plague of the homosexual agenda has been spread within the Church, promoted by organized networks and protected by a climate of complicity and a conspiracy of silence.”
Click to expand...

Of course the sexual rape of both girls and boys in the church for decades and most likely even for centuries is part of the plague of the homosexual agenda within the church.

Even Luther in 1510 concluded that the pope and the cardinals had a number of boys "they kept for pleasure" and accused the pope and the cardinals of sodomy.

All of course the fault of the "homosexual agenda". **** you cardinals, even now you come up with pathetic reasons as to why catholic clergy abuse children all over the world. It has nothing to do with homosexual agenda's because this has been going on since far before there was a so-called homosexual agenda in the church. This has been a problem for centuries because of the power the clergy had over people, which was close to absolute. That meant no child could come forward and tell what had happened because they would not have been believed and they themselves would have been the ones in trouble for lying about that nice priest.

I don't know whether it has to do with celibacy but for some reason this is a far greater problem in the catholic church than in most other religions as far as we know and blaming the gays for your own sins is ridiculous and totally not a solution to stop the perverts running free in your church today.
 
Peter King said:
During a sex abuse gathering in the Vatican, one that I was hopeful for, has gone partly back to the same old problems of the catholic church:

- it's is not really our fault

To which I say, **** you catholic church. During the sexual abuse gathering in the Vatican this was part of the message sent out by cardinals:



Of course the sexual rape of both girls and boys in the church for decades and most likely even for centuries is part of the plague of the homosexual agenda within the church.

Even Luther in 1510 concluded that the pope and the cardinals had a number of boys "they kept for pleasure" and accused the pope and the cardinals of sodomy.

All of course the fault of the "homosexual agenda". **** you cardinals, even now you come up with pathetic reasons as to why catholic clergy abuse children all over the world. It has nothing to do with homosexual agenda's because this has been going on since far before there was a so-called homosexual agenda in the church. This has been a problem for centuries because of the power the clergy had over people, which was close to absolute. That meant no child could come forward and tell what had happened because they would not have been believed and they themselves would have been the ones in trouble for lying about that nice priest.

I don't know whether it has to do with celibacy but for some reason this is a far greater problem in the catholic church than in most other religions as far as we know and blaming the gays for your own sins is ridiculous and totally not a solution to stop the perverts running free in your church today.
Click to expand...

The cabal by homosexuals in the Catholic church has been reported more than a decade ago!
It's been going on for who knows how long - that's why it's so widespread!



Because The Wanderer's archives prior to 2004 are not available online, many Catholics may not know the history the paper has on exposing the liturgical abuses that have been flourishing since Vatican II, the heretical bishops and the homosexual cabal within the Church.

Throughout the 1980s and up to his death in 2016, Paul Likoudis, the news editor for The Wanderer, investigated and exposed the spread of homosexuality inside the Church and the cover-up of the sexual abuse of minors.

In 1991, he wrote a series on Bp. Howard Hubbard's "pastoral plan" for the diocese of Albany, New York that favored the ordination and spread of homosexual priests. Likoudis knew and worked with Fr. John Minkler for over a decade to expose the homosexual network in Bp. Hubbard's diocese.

Likoudis spoke with Fr. Minkler only six hours after he was called into the chancery before Bp. Hubbard and Fr. Kenneth Doyle, the chancellor of the diocese of Albany, and forced to sign a statement denying he wrote a letter calling out Bp. Hubbard as "the ringleader of a cabal of homosexual priests."

Likoudis wrote in 2010 about that conversation. He said that Fr. Minkler "sounded scared" and said:

He asked for advice, and he was extremely apprehensive about a forthcoming meeting with Hubbard, set for Monday, February 16. I suggested that he pre-empt the meeting by holding his own press conference "and let everything out." His response was that if he did that, "I'd be dead."

Likoudis noted this was only 48 hours before Fr. Minkler was found dead from an apparent suicide.
Click to expand...
Bp. Hubbard, "the ringleader of a cabal of homosexual priest."



Paul Likoudis, Vindicated

For years, Paul Likoudis, our late and beloved colleague at The Wanderer, chronicled the role of homosexuality in the crimes committed by clerics. Long before The Boston Globe published its “exposé” in early 2002, Paul reported on one instance after another of abuse and cover-up in chanceries nationwide. For his yeoman efforts, he was ridiculed, hectored, threatened, bullied, and, above all, studiously ignored whenever possible by one guilty bishop after another.

When The Globe’s series appeared in January 2002, the bishops could no longer persist in their obstinate denial. But they immediately insisted that they had the problem under control. “It’s over,” Auxiliary Bishop (now Vatican Cardinal) Kevin Farrell told the Knights of Malta in February 2002.
Click to expand...
Paul Likoudis, Vindicated | The Wanderer Newspaper
 
Last edited:
Peter King said:
Even Luther in 1510 concluded that the pope and the cardinals had a number of boys "they kept for pleasure" and accused the pope and the cardinals of sodomy.
Click to expand...

Homosexuality isn't a modern-day phenomenon. It's been around even in ancient times.




The Vatican’s Secret Life
Despite headlines about a powerful “gay lobby” within the Vatican, and a new Pope promising reform, the Catholic Church’s gay cardinals, monks, and other clergy inhabit a hidden netherworld. In Rome, the author learns how they navigate the dangerous paradox of their lives.
Click to expand...
The Secret Lives of the Vatican’s Gay Cardinals, Monks, and Other Clergy Members | Vanity Fair
 
Last edited:
The “homosexual agenda”? So when a man rapes a little girl is that part of the “heterosexual agenda”?
 
Skeptic Bob said:
The “homosexual agenda”? So when a man rapes a little girl is that part of the “heterosexual agenda”?
Click to expand...
Do people choose to be attracted to young children?
That sexual preference is not a choice was a justification for mainstreaming homosexuality.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Eriech said:
Do people choose to be attracted to young children?
That sexual preference is not a choice was a justification for mainstreaming homosexuality.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Except gays are not attracted to children, straights aren't attracted to children, pedophiles (which is what the accused clergy are guilty of) are attracted to children. Making this not a gay issue or a straight issue but a perverts issue.
 
Just blame it on Jussie Smollet. He deserves it.
 
Eriech said:
Do people choose to be attracted to young children?
That sexual preference is not a choice was a justification for mainstreaming homosexuality.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I highly doubt that people choose to be attracted to children. But just because something isn't a choice doesn't necessarily mean society should allow people to act on it. I'm attracted to adult women. I can't NOT be attracted to them. However, I can chose how I act on that. If no woman will have sex with me that wouldn't justify me raping them. On more than one occasion in my 20s I would notice and attractive young lady who upon talking to I realized was a mature looking 16 or 17 year old. At that point I say, "have a nice day" and move on.

You can't help who you are attracted to. You CAN help how you act on it. Pedophiles and pederasts were dealt an ugly hand. Whether by nature or nurture, they are stuck with a physical attraction they can't act on. And as long as they chose not to act on those attractions, we as a society should give them all the medical treatment they need and want to help them combat it. But the moment they indicate that they can't resist they must be removed from society for the safety of the public.
 
Skeptic Bob said:
I highly doubt that people choose to be attracted to children. But just because something isn't a choice doesn't necessarily mean society should allow people to act on it. I'm attracted to adult women. I can't NOT be attracted to them. However, I can chose how I act on that. If no woman will have sex with me that wouldn't justify me raping them. On more than one occasion in my 20s I would notice and attractive young lady who upon talking to I realized was a mature looking 16 or 17 year old. At that point I say, "have a nice day" and move on.

You can't help who you are attracted to. You CAN help how you act on it. Pedophiles and pederasts were dealt an ugly hand. Whether by nature or nurture, they are stuck with a physical attraction they can't act on. And as long as they chose not to act on those attractions, we as a society should give them all the medical treatment they need and want to help them combat it. But the moment they indicate that they can't resist they must be removed from society for the safety of the public.
Click to expand...
I agree and that is the point. It wasn't that long ago society demanded that gays and lesbians repress and chose not to act on certain attractions.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Eriech said:
I agree and that is the point. It wasn't that long ago society demanded that gays and lesbians repress and chose not to act on certain attractions.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yep. But it is important not to construe homosexual and heterosexual attractions as being the same ethically or legally with pedophilia. People attracted to adult men and women are attracted to people who can give consent. Pedophiles are not. Accepting homosexuality was not a slippery slope to accepting pedophila. There is no slippery slope of consent. I’m not saying you, but some people try to equate the two.
 
Skeptic Bob said:
Yep. But it is important not to construe homosexual and heterosexual attractions as being the same ethically or legally with pedophilia. People attracted to adult men and women are attracted to people who can give consent. Pedophiles are not. Accepting homosexuality was not a slippery slope to accepting pedophila. There is no slippery slope of consent. I’m not saying you, but some people try to equate the two.
Click to expand...
I agree. There is though a movement to make them the same. Once it is accepted that it is not a choice the same path (gay rights) is inevitable or at least already a goal for some.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Peter King said:
During a sex abuse gathering in the Vatican, one that I was hopeful for, has gone partly back to the same old problems of the catholic church:

- it's is not really our fault

To which I say, **** you catholic church. During the sexual abuse gathering in the Vatican this was part of the message sent out by cardinals:



Of course the sexual rape of both girls and boys in the church for decades and most likely even for centuries is part of the plague of the homosexual agenda within the church.

Even Luther in 1510 concluded that the pope and the cardinals had a number of boys "they kept for pleasure" and accused the pope and the cardinals of sodomy.

All of course the fault of the "homosexual agenda". **** you cardinals, even now you come up with pathetic reasons as to why catholic clergy abuse children all over the world. It has nothing to do with homosexual agenda's because this has been going on since far before there was a so-called homosexual agenda in the church. This has been a problem for centuries because of the power the clergy had over people, which was close to absolute. That meant no child could come forward and tell what had happened because they would not have been believed and they themselves would have been the ones in trouble for lying about that nice priest.

I don't know whether it has to do with celibacy but for some reason this is a far greater problem in the catholic church than in most other religions as far as we know and blaming the gays for your own sins is ridiculous and totally not a solution to stop the perverts running free in your church today.
Click to expand...

Oh?

71wkP7R3VhL._AC._SR360,460.jpg
 
Skeptic Bob said:
The “homosexual agenda”? So when a man rapes a little girl is that part of the “heterosexual agenda”?
Click to expand...

When it's a priest, she's an exception. The vast majority of victims have been adolescent boys.
 
Peter King said:
Except gays are not attracted to children, straights aren't attracted to children, pedophiles (which is what the accused clergy are guilty of) are attracted to children. Making this not a gay issue or a straight issue but a perverts issue.
Click to expand...

Then why are most of the victims boys, and not little boys, but adolescent boys?
 
A 13 year old girl claimed Trump raped her.Is Trump Catholic?
 
devildavid said:
Because most catholic priests are pedophiles?
Click to expand...
Pedophiles like only adolescent boys? Adolescents aren't children.

Sent from my phone. Instaurare omnia in Christo.
 
Peter King said:
During a sex abuse gathering in the Vatican, one that I was hopeful for, has gone partly back to the same old problems of the catholic church:

- it's is not really our fault

To which I say, **** you catholic church. During the sexual abuse gathering in the Vatican this was part of the message sent out by cardinals:



Of course the sexual rape of both girls and boys in the church for decades and most likely even for centuries is part of the plague of the homosexual agenda within the church.

Even Luther in 1510 concluded that the pope and the cardinals had a number of boys "they kept for pleasure" and accused the pope and the cardinals of sodomy.

All of course the fault of the "homosexual agenda". **** you cardinals, even now you come up with pathetic reasons as to why catholic clergy abuse children all over the world. It has nothing to do with homosexual agenda's because this has been going on since far before there was a so-called homosexual agenda in the church. This has been a problem for centuries because of the power the clergy had over people, which was close to absolute. That meant no child could come forward and tell what had happened because they would not have been believed and they themselves would have been the ones in trouble for lying about that nice priest.

I don't know whether it has to do with celibacy but for some reason this is a far greater problem in the catholic church than in most other religions as far as we know and blaming the gays for your own sins is ridiculous and totally not a solution to stop the perverts running free in your church today.
Click to expand...

LMAO anybody that tries to blame this on homosexuals or the notion of a homosexual agenda, which factually doesnt exist is monumentally uneducated and nothing but a huge bigoted vile moron that is desperate to deflect from the real issue and its funny watching them fail and honest, educated and objective people just mocking them for their stupidity and dishonesty.
 
Skeptic Bob said:
The “homosexual agenda”? So when a man rapes a little girl is that part of the “heterosexual agenda”?
Click to expand...

exactly its always funny when people blame imaginary things . . .blaming the homosexual agenda for this is just as honest and logical as blaming santa clause
 
phattonez said:
When it's a priest, she's an exception. The vast majority of victims have been adolescent boys.
Click to expand...

Due to the fact that because of the political structure, and the children who take care of the altar are male, it's a matter of opportunity, rather than preference. As it is, 20% of the victims were girls.
 
Eriech said:
Do people choose to be attracted to young children?
That sexual preference is not a choice was a justification for mainstreaming homosexuality.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

1.) pedophilia is not a sexual orientation
2.) even if it was, and its not, sexual orientation is no justification for rape and other crimes
:prof
 
phattonez said:
Pedophiles like only adolescent boys? Adolescents aren't children.

Sent from my phone. Instaurare omnia in Christo.
Click to expand...

What in the heck is wrong with you? SMH in complete disgust...

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) commissioned the John Jay College of Criminal Justice to conduct a comprehensive study based on surveys completed by the Roman Catholic dioceses in the United States. The product of the study, titled the John Jay Report indicated that some 11,000 allegations had been made against 4,392 priests in the USA. This number constituted approximately 4% of the priests who had served during the period covered by the survey (1950–2002).[35] Of the abused, 81% were male, and 19% were female, 22% were younger than age 11, 51% were between the ages of 11 and 14, and 27% were between the ages of 15 and 17 years when first abused. Within the youngest age group, 64% of abused children were male, while within the older age groups, 85% were male. [35] 2,411 of the priests had a single allegation made against them, while 149 priests had 10 or more allegations made against them.
Click to expand...

Catholic Church sex abuse cases in the United States - Wikipedia
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom