• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reasons to Reject Atheism

Logician Man said:
:funny
/// internet atheists /////
Click to expand...

zyzygy said:
Belief, faith but no proof. That sums up this thread.
Click to expand...

Quaestio said:
A fundamentalist using a Captain Picard image was pretty funny. :D

No such thing as 'the devil'. It's fictional. Like Captain Picard, and Noah, and Santa and Satan.
Click to expand...

Quaestio said:
When I was a kid at school being taught by Catholic nuns, it would just get you a day sitting a corner with a Dunce's hat on. Thank god for progress?
Click to expand...

Logician Man said:
Then you have no urge to follow your biblical directive which makes you, by sheer definition, a religious hypocrite.
Click to expand...

RAMOSS said:
Well, that shows that Jesus was wrong, and therefore not God. We have proof postiive that a world wide flood did not exist.
Click to expand...

Rich2018 said:
That was my feeling too.

Have you ever known a professed Catholic to admit not being 100% sure that god exists ?


A few hundred years ago, admitting even the smallest amount of doubt would get you burned at the stake.
Click to expand...

Cephus said:
That's just a bald rationalization to explain why people don't buy into your imaginary friend. It's meant to protect your feelings instead of discover the reality. Because if you ask people why they reject your god, they're not going to say they want to sin (which has no meaning without a god belief), they're going to tell you the actual reason why they don't buy into it, because there is no evidence for it.

But the religious don't like that fact so they try to spin it in other ways.
Click to expand...

After 925 posts, the OP thesis has been demonstrated. By the atheist posts themselves.

Angel said:
Once a profound cry of despair worthy of the deepest respect, atheism, under the influence of Dawkins, Dennett, Harris and Krauss (formerly Hitchens), the self-styled "New Atheists" of the new millennium -- under this pernicious influence, I say, atheism has become a strident exercise in ignorance, by ignorance, and for ignorance.

Some of the stupidest assertions ever made by Man have been made in the last fifteen years in the spirit and letter of New Atheism by educated and intelligent people.

Atheism today is self-contradictory mental pabulum for those incapable of independent critical thinking.

Atheism today is conflated with thoughtless anti-theism without a shred of self=awareness.

Atheism today is anti-religionism scared witless by the tragic historical event of 9/11.

Atheism today is without a single argument

Atheism today is without the courage of its convictions, in vociferous in self-denial that it even constitutes a belief.

Atheism today is just surly, mean-spirited lack of imagination on a mission.

Atheism today is a tale told by an idiot in the mantle of a skeptic.

The prosecution rests.
Click to expand...
QED
 
Quag said:
It isn't denial there is nothing there that says science claims God is probable
Science doesn't speak to the probability of God
Click to expand...

Read again:

The National Academy of Sciences also says:

"Many religious persons, including many scientists, hold that God created the universe and the various processes driving physical and biological evolution and that these processes then resulted in the creation of galaxies, our solar system, and life on Earth.
This belief, which sometimes is termed 'theistic evolution,' is not in disagreement with scientific explanations of evolution.
Indeed, it reflects the remarkable and inspiring character of the physical universe revealed by cosmology, paleontology, molecular biology, and many other scientific disciplines."
Click to expand...
https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/site/faq.html




The statement of the National Academy of Sciences does speak about the probability of a God-created universe (theistic evolution) -

therefore, it speaks about the probability of the existence of God.


Logical reasoning. Can't get any simpler than that.
If you still can't understand that, you're clearly in denial. :shrug:
 
Last edited:
tosca1 said:
Read again:


https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/site/faq.html




The statement of the National Academy of Sciences does speak about the probability of a God-created universe (theistic evolution) -

therefore, it speaks about the probability of the existence of God.


Logical reasoning. Can't get any simpler than that.
If you still can't understand that, you're clearly in denial. :shrug:
Click to expand...

I read it again and again it says there are scientists that BELEIVE in God it doesn't say that science says God is probable
There is a difference between a personal belief and a scientific probability.
 
Angel said:
After 925 posts, the OP thesis has been demonstrated. By the atheist posts themselves.


QED
Click to expand...

After 925 posts the OP has been proven wrong as always
 
Angel said:
Pee Weeeeeeeeeeee!
Click to expand...

Why do you keep calling yourself that?
Do you really think anyone takes you as seriously as him?
 
tosca1 said:
Read again:


https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/site/faq.html




The statement of the National Academy of Sciences does speak about the probability of a God-created universe (theistic evolution) -

therefore, it speaks about the probability of the existence of God.


Logical reasoning. Can't get any simpler than that.
If you still can't understand that, you're clearly in denial. :shrug:
Click to expand...

in the same way flying unicorns are possible and you might wanna switch to possible form probable


you get that no one has assigned a percentage of how likely gods are to exist right?
 
Angel said:
Once a profound cry of despair worthy of the deepest respect, atheism, under the influence of Dawkins, Dennett, Harris and Krauss (formerly Hitchens), the self-styled "New Atheists" of the new millennium -- under this pernicious influence, I say, atheism has become a strident exercise in ignorance, by ignorance, and for ignorance.

Some of the stupidest assertions ever made by Man have been made in the last fifteen years in the spirit and letter of New Atheism by educated and intelligent people.

Atheism today is self-contradictory mental pabulum for those incapable of independent critical thinking.

Atheism today is conflated with thoughtless anti-theism without a shred of self=awareness.

Atheism today is anti-religionism scared witless by the tragic historical event of 9/11.

Atheism today is without a single argument

Atheism today is without the courage of its convictions, in vociferous in self-denial that it even constitutes a belief.

Atheism today is just surly, mean-spirited lack of imagination on a mission.

Atheism today is a tale told by an idiot in the mantle of a skeptic.

The prosecution rests.
Click to expand...

I want to believe in Atheism. I really do. All I need is something solid - some scientific evidence that it truly exists.
 
Quag said:
You still have nothing but insults and logical fallacies I see
I am sure your "God" would approve of your honorable behavior

:lamo
Click to expand...

He doesn't believe in god.
 
Angel said:
You're way off base and reciting talking points. The internet atheists are the spawn of Dopey Dick Dawkins and deserve all the criticism thrown their way.
Click to expand...

Your claim is rather broad. All internet atheists are the spawn of Dopey Dick Dawkins? Your prejudice is revealed.
 
Angel said:
My bias is confirmed every day in this forum by the posts of militant atheists.
Thank you for your post.
Click to expand...

Thanks for admitting to your bias. The first step in correcting a problem is acknowledging it.
 
devildavid said:
Thanks for admitting to your bias. The first step in correcting a problem is acknowledging it.
Click to expand...


That person does not really care what others actually say. He really just wants to condemn all those horrible God hating atheists.
 
davidhume said:
That person does not really care what others actually say. He really just wants to condemn all those horrible God hating atheists.
Click to expand...
That person does not really care what others actually say about him. but that seems to be the only subject about which these aforementioned others have anything to say.
 
Angel said:
Once a profound cry of despair worthy of the deepest respect, atheism, under the influence of Dawkins, Dennett, Harris and Krauss (formerly Hitchens), the self-styled "New Atheists" of the new millennium -- under this pernicious influence, I say, atheism has become a strident exercise in ignorance, by ignorance, and for ignorance.

Some of the stupidest assertions ever made by Man have been made in the last fifteen years in the spirit and letter of New Atheism by educated and intelligent people.

Atheism today is self-contradictory mental pabulum for those incapable of independent critical thinking.

Atheism today is conflated with thoughtless anti-theism without a shred of self=awareness.

Atheism today is anti-religionism scared witless by the tragic historical event of 9/11.

Atheism today is without a single argument

Atheism today is without the courage of its convictions, in vociferous in self-denial that it even constitutes a belief.

Atheism today is just surly, mean-spirited lack of imagination on a mission.

Atheism today is a tale told by an idiot in the mantle of a skeptic.

The prosecution rests.
Click to expand...

All you did was attack atheism with a bunch of insults.

Why would anyone above the age of three reject atheism based on insults? That makes no sense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom