If he provided a handy chart with all sorts of colors and arrows outlining his disagreement, perhaps that would suffice?
OM
I am open to suggestions from him.Heck, why stop there? Might as well add periods and cultural caveats to your self-imposed list of qualifiers. Cool internet link!
OM
I was watching this video by Jordan Peterson;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyYdGiJpyXk
The gist is that the civilization we have is founded upon Christian principals. And that by abandoning this religion we will create a civilization that simply does not function.
I can see his point. The present philosophy of business is the MBA. In that lying is something you do in your actions all the time. You expect others to do it. You live the life of the slippery slope.
This is, I think the exact opposite of how I, an atheist, wish to live.
The truth and disiple of not cheating or swindling others is what I want my life to be about.
I think we need a new philosophy of progress and responsibilty. Maybe JP is one of the herads of this process of creating such a thing.
Does anybody else have an input into the new philosophy of society?
I believe Christian principles carry weight as they were inspired by a force greater than man. If we decide to abandon them, then we wander into the dangerous area of moral relativism. I mean if there is a group that believe men are superior and may rape, kidnap, or do whatever they please with women, who are we to say they are wrong? I mean, how do you stop it? We see the slow movement toward moral relativism with the sexual identity movement. There are those that believe we should stop saying "he" and "she". Check out JP on gender pronouns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_UbmaZQx74
If he provided a handy chart with all sorts of colors and arrows outlining his disagreement, perhaps that would suffice?
OM
I am open to suggestions from him.
I believe Christian principles carry weight as they were inspired by a force greater than man. If we decide to abandon them, then we wander into the dangerous area of moral relativism. I mean if there is a group that believe men are superior and may rape, kidnap, or do whatever they please with women, who are we to say they are wrong? I mean, how do you stop it? We see the slow movement toward moral relativism with the sexual identity movement. There are those that believe we should stop saying "he" and "she". Check out JP on gender pronouns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_UbmaZQx74
Heck, why stop there? Might as well add periods and cultural caveats to your self-imposed list of qualifiers. Cool internet link!
OM
People never abandon religion. They just redefine God. To atheists it is replacing "God" with "government," with some ideological master or going sociopathic and defining god as him/herself. Humans are extreme herding animals and therefore must have herding animal structures of authority and core herding animal instinctive rules accepted as truisms.
I tend toward Process/Relational theology,and as such, I can't really say I truly believe things like the Immaculate Conception, the Real Presence of the Eucharist, or even the traditional understanding of the Incarnation etc
How so? Maybe you were watching an old rerun of "Kung Fu", and wondered how it is that Shaolin profess to be able to "walk thru walls"? Is that where you're getting your Taoism = mysticism idea?
OM
I believe Christian principles carry weight as they were inspired by a force greater than man. If we decide to abandon them, then we wander into the dangerous area of moral relativism. I mean if there is a group that believe men are superior and may rape, kidnap, or do whatever they please with women, who are we to say they are wrong? I mean, how do you stop it? We see the slow movement toward moral relativism with the sexual identity movement. There are those that believe we should stop saying "he" and "she". Check out JP on gender pronouns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_UbmaZQx74
Plenty of rape, murder, genocide and enslavement in the name of God in the Bible.
With the omission of the Resurrection, you've cast away all the biggies of Catholic doctrine, so I'll take this--as with, similarly, the term "secular Jew"--as your self-defining as a cultural Catholic.
nah but almost as bad wikipedia
pretty sure that show mes up buddhism mostly
People never abandon religion. They just redefine God. To atheists it is replacing "God" with "government," with some ideological master or going sociopathic and defining god as him/herself. Humans are extreme herding animals and therefore must have herding animal structures of authority and core herding animal instinctive rules accepted as truisms.
"During almost fifteen centuries, has the legal establishment of Christianity been
on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence
in the Clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and
persecution....In some instances they have been seen to
erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of Civil authority; in many instances they
have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have
they been seen the guardans of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wished to
subvert the public liberties, may have found an established clergy convenient
auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure & perpetuate it, needs them
not."
-James Madison
What do questions about gender have to do with whether we want to allow people to kill each other?
Allow people to kill each other??
In response to posts #1255 and 1256.
OM
What are your beliefs about Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Shintoist and Taoist principles?