• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:517]Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

Your answer is in the Bible, if you knew as much about Christianity as you think you do you wouldn't have to ask.

hush, 'Father,' No one is yanking your chain.......have a nice nite...
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

Shhhhhssh, son...back to your online study group...peace

So what's the answer to your question, wise guy? We are waiting with bated breath....
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

So what's the answer to your question, wise guy? We are waiting with bated breath....

No one takes a foul mouthed hater posing as beeeeeship seriously. Forked tongues are to be ignored. It......is.....done...
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

Save your revisionist JW nonsense for someone who is dumb enough to accept it.

Bad translations in the Jehovah's Witnesses' New World Translation

https://carm.org/bad-translations-jehovahs-witness-bible-new-world-translation

"John 1:1--They mistranslate the verse as "a god." Again, it is because they deny who Jesus is and must change the Bible to make it agree with their theology. The Jehovah's Witness version is this: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god."

So, the JW's apparently have many gods if their representation of John 1:1 is correct. How many do you worship? You are obviously POLYtheists!

Philippians 2:5, 6:

KJ reads: “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” (Dy has the same wording. JB reads: “he did not cling to his equality with God.”) However, in NW the latter portion of that passage reads: “who, although he was existing in God’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure [Greek, har·pag·monʹ], namely, that he should be equal to God.” (RS, NE, TEV, NAB convey the same thought.)

Which thought agrees with the context? Verse 5 counsels Christians to imitate Christ in the matter here being discussed. Could they be urged to consider it “not robbery,” but their right, “to be equal with God”? Surely not! However, they can imitate one who “gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.” (NW) (Compare Genesis 3:5.) Such a translation also agrees with Jesus Christ himself, who said: “The Father is greater than I.”—John 14:28.

The Expositor’s Greek Testament says: “We cannot find any passage where [har·paʹzo] or any of its derivatives [including har·pag·monʹ] has the sense of ‘holding in possession,’ ‘retaining’. It seems invariably to mean ‘seize,’ ‘snatch violently’. Thus it is not permissible to glide from the true sense ‘grasp at’ into one which is totally different, ‘hold fast.’”—(Grand Rapids, Mich.; 1967), edited by W. Robertson Nicoll, Vol. III, pp. 436, 437.

https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1101989276
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

No one takes a foul mouthed hater posing as beeeeeship seriously. Forked tongues are to be ignored. It......is.....done...

What delicious irony...
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

You know, there's a number of you Christ-deniers who make oddball claims, then are shown the truth, but who refuse to learn or you purposefully ignore what's presented to you.

Then you repeat your folly over and over and over again.

I'm not going to waste anymore time on your nonsense. You're not a fair arbiter of the truth, IMO.

You havent shown me anything. A blog isnt the truth- its like a terrorist showing me an al Qaeda website to justify their falsehoods
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

You havent shown me anything. A blog isnt the truth- its like a terrorist showing me an al Qaeda website to justify their falsehoods

He is a Krishna denier. Woe unto him in his next life!
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

Jehovah’s Witnesses: A Cult of Isolation and Fear
A story about the destructive power of false beliefs


https://medium.com/@r.m.weisgerber/jehovahs-witnesses-a-cult-of-isolation-and-fear-424129c7b6d2

Just to clarify...this is but one twisted view through a child's eyes nonetheless, who had parents that only talked the talk but failed to walk the walk...granted, it happens throughout all different faiths...those who sadly put on a facade, not just JW's...my grown children, who have followed the same faith as I, could write a very different account...they have thanked me more than once for raising them, not only to be in the truth, but to have the truth in them...their hearts and minds...there is a big difference...
 
Re: Jehovah's Witnesses: Cult or Ministers of God...

https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1101989276

Your link explanation on John 8:58 doesn't help you a bit It reads,

RS reads: “Jesus said to them, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am [Greek, e·goʹ ei·miʹ].’” (NE, KJ, TEV, JB, NAB all read “I am,” some even using capital letters to convey the idea of a title. Thus they endeavor to connect the expression with Exodus 3:14, where, according to their rendering, God refers to himself by the title “I Am.”) However, in NW the latter part of John 8:58 reads: “Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.” (The same idea is conveyed by the wording in AT, Mo, CBW, and SE.)

Which rendering agrees with the context? The question of the Jews (verse 57) to which Jesus was replying had to do with age, not identity. Jesus’ reply logically dealt with his age, the length of his existence. Interestingly, no effort is ever made to apply e·goʹ ei·miʹ as a title to the holy spirit.

Says A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, by A. T. Robertson: “The verb [ei·miʹ] . . . Sometimes it does express existence as a predicate like any other verb, as in [e·goʹ ei·miʹ] (Jo. 8:58).”—Nashville, Tenn.; 1934, p. 394.

See also NW appendix, 1984 Reference edition, pp. 1582, 1583. (end of quote).

That's not only shallow but lame.

My explanation was more in depth and agrees with the tense of the earliest manuscripts:

"So strong was Jesus’ affirmation of deity in John 8:58 that the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Bible (the (NWT) had to mistranslate the present active indicative verb, eimi (“am”) turning it into a past tense: “I have been”. From this, the JW’s argue that Jesus was not claiming to be deity (“I am”), but rather He was claiming to be “older” than Abraham was (as Michael the archangel), which incited the Jews to want to kill Him. However, what immediately refutes this false notion is:

1) Simply, the Greek text contains the PRESENT indicative verb eimi (“am”) and not any kind of past tense. This clearly shows that the NWT purposely altered the Greek NT text, from the present “I am” (viz. the Eternal One) to a past “I have been” (as if Jesus was merely saying that He is older than Abraham) to fit the distinctive theology of the WT (WatchTower).

https://christiandefense.org/jehovah...t-on-john-858/
 
Back
Top Bottom