• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Morality with no god at all

Dragonfly

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
31,258
Reaction score
19,756
Location
East Coast - USA
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Yes Virginia, it's a thing.

There's no absolute need for a god to be moral.

FACT
 
Yes Virginia, it's a thing.

There's no absolute need for a god to be moral.

FACT

Who's asserting that God and/or belief in God is necessary for someone to act morally?

I, as a believer, would completely agree with you on this.
 
Have you not been reading some of these threads here?

I read some threads closely, I lightly skim over others, and I ignore many more, so maybe I'm missing posts of it, but it's not a claim from Christians that I run across... Christians usually say that one needs God to answer numerous why questions (and to properly ground morality), but not (typically, anyway) that nonbelievers can't be moral.
 
I worship, like, thirty ****ing gods and I generally take their morality under advisement.

They are good because they mostly do good things. Those things aren't necessarily good just because the gods do them.
 
I read some threads closely, I lightly skim over others, and I ignore many more, so maybe I'm missing posts of it, but it's not a claim from Christians that I run across... Christians usually say that one needs God to answer numerous why questions (and to properly ground morality), but not (typically, anyway) that nonbelievers can't be moral.

ummmmm...???????

Ummmmmmmm what? There are many questions that are unanswered (and no firm right/wrong grounding for morality) without God, but that's not making the claim that God is needed for nonbelievers to act morally... that's just making the claim that God makes more sense out of morality and the why questions that come with morality...
 
Yes Virginia, it's a thing.

There's no absolute need for a god to be moral.

FACT

There is also no absolute need of a god to obey traffic laws.

Or fry an egg.

What's your point?
 
There is also no absolute need of a god to obey traffic laws.

Or fry an egg.

What's your point?

There's a crap-ton of people here (and not here) who feel without god there would be no morals.
Or no need for morals.
That we'd all be raping, murdering, child molesting, thieving savages.
 
There is also no absolute need of a god to obey traffic laws.

Or fry an egg.

What's your point?

Many people believe we have an absolute need for a god.

Are you not following any of the threads in this area at all?
 
that's just making the claim that God makes more sense out of morality and the why questions that come with morality...

Well, your "claim" is exactly what this thread is about.

One needs no god to make sense out of anything, or "properly ground" anything.
 
There is also no absolute need of a god to obey traffic laws.

Or fry an egg.

What's your point?

I could tell ya but it'd probably get me banned...:mrgreen:
 
Yes Virginia, it's a thing.

There's no absolute need for a god to be moral.

FACT

That is 100% correct. Since the fact is morals are subjective nothing is NEEDED for them.

There are people wit no god that are 100 times more moral than people with god, its just reality.

I myself am christian and my morals come from many places but they are still just my subjective view of them. On this planet by definition they will always be subjective I cant deny facts.
 
Who's asserting that God and/or belief in God is necessary for someone to act morally?

I, as a believer, would completely agree with you on this.

its not any majority thats for sure . . ive only seen it from probably like 5 people tops over the years. its around the same low numbers that think morals are objective or abortion = murder etc but a couple do exist.

I know theres nobody at my church that feels its needed.
 
There's a crap-ton of people here (and not here) who feel without god there would be no morals.
Or no need for morals.
That we'd all be raping, murdering, child molesting, thieving savages.

Look around the world. We have a code of morals and still have a lot of that and wars, too. We are not very good at doing the right thing.
 
That is 100% correct. Since the fact is morals are subjective nothing is NEEDED for them.

There are people wit no god that are 100 times more moral than people with god, its just reality.

I myself am christian and my morals come from many places but they are still just my subjective view of them. On this planet by definition they will always be subjective I cant deny facts.

This atheist is about a thousand times more moral than Oliver Cromwell. I have never massacred any Catholics.
 
There's a crap-ton of people here (and not here) who feel without god there would be no morals.
Or no need for morals.
That we'd all be raping, murdering, child molesting, thieving savages.

I understand.

i would ask the same question of them that I asked of you.

Society demands commonly accepted norms of behavior for the society to maintain. They don't need to be the same behaviors from one society to the next, but in each society, they need to be commonly accepted.

Anyway, that's the way I "feel" about it.I could be wrong.
 
:roll:

What's deceptive about it?

What he posted:

"I read some threads closely, I lightly skim over others, and I ignore many more, so maybe I'm missing posts of it, but it's not a claim from Christians that I run across... Christians usually say that one needs God to answer numerous why questions (and to properly ground morality), but not (typically, anyway) that nonbelievers can't be moral."

What you posted:

"Quote Originally Posted by gfm7175 View Post
Christians usually say that one needs God to answer numerous why questions (and to properly ground morality)"


Omitting the parts you omitted changes the meaning of his post. there could not have been andy system limitaions on the length of the post.

I was only wondering...
 
Why did you deceptively edit the quote you posted?

I read the quote. What's deceptive about it?

Seems like gfm contradicted himself in a single sentence.
 
There's a crap-ton of people here (and not here) who feel without god there would be no morals.
Or no need for morals.
That we'd all be raping, murdering, child molesting, thieving savages.

This is like a little kid not understanding why he should still behave, clean up his room, not pull his little sister’s hair, or bathe regularly, even if his parents were not around. If you lack the judgment, maturity, knowledge, and intelligence to make decisions on issues based on their own merits, you will always need an external authority to tell you what to do.
 
I read the quote. What's deceptive about it?

Seems like gfm contradicted himself in a single sentence.

He most certainly did contradiction himself


its like this

do you have to be a steeler fan to believe in Ben . .

no of course not

(small print) . . . BUT only true steeler fans can properly believe in ben and understand
 
Back
Top Bottom