• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is the Antichrist?

The Christians that have been attacked for decades, haven't behaved like Christians for decades. They borrow the name so they can play a pretty role for sheep that can't tell a shepherd from a wolf in shepherd's clothing.

I'm not a democrat, but it's stupid to think that the Democratic party is comprised entirely of atheist's and Muslims. They are by majority, Christians themselves. So I doubt they booed god.

The DNC booed God down on their platform three times! You cannot be a Christian and a liberal at the same time. It is a stark contradiction as liberals are at war with God and all His faithful. And your statement about Christians not behaving as Christians was just outright stupid and extremely judgmental. Do you know every Christian who lives in the world? I bet you don't know any. Anyway, here is a video where the Democrats booed God three times. Now they are totally and completely anti-God and anti-Israel and support Hamas. That is what you support.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8BwqzzqcDs

The media criticized Trump's support of moving the embassy to Jerusalem, because it was short sighted, because anyone could see how that would go down. It was a lot of bull****, for what? A symbolic gesture meant to piss the other side off. Jesus would not support that. Read his words. Read history. Christianity spread through out Rome because of it's pacifism. Christians would choose execution over enlistment. Forgiving those that were murdering them, during the act. Just like Jesus did.

I have a **** ton of Jewish friends from America and Israel. The Jews are very happy with Trump and now have two Temple commemorative coins out with Trump on them. Trump has done good for Israel. The Democrats want all Jews in Israel to be exterminated and that is now their official position.

And determining whether something is anti Christ, has nothing to do with how his fake ass followers are being treated. It is entirely on how well Jesus philosophy compares to the individual and/or group's philosophy. Trump's is the opposite of Jesus. Making him anti. That's what the word means opposing/opposite. And the people who claim Trump is god's choice, preach greed over grace. The opposite of Christ's philosophy.
Excuse me but who are you? Being a Christians does not mean you believe in evolution, support Islam, murder Jews and vote gay marriage over God's sanctified marriage between a man and a woman. Being a Christian means you have humility and with a statement like yours it shows how you have no humility because you judge faithful believers as hypocrites and give ascendance to nominal Christians (hypocrites).

Meaning, any Christian the supports Trump, is supporting an anti Christ, and therefor are anti-Christian in their own philosophy. I'll call them AChristians from now on. Let them figure out what the capital A stands for.

You know nothing about what you talk about. Trump is a Christian. He is challenging antichrist liberals. To be an antichrist you have to be an anti-christ just as the word says. All liberals are antichrists who support antichrist. The Bible tells us what a Christian is and liberals are considered children of the devil. Trump is trying to save this country from the evil antichrist progressives---the kind you see on this forum ganging up and attacking me for speaking the truth. If you do not have enough sense to understand a single word I have written here then perhaps you are "past repentance" as Tyndale correctly translates.

Ephesians 4:19-20, 1537 Matthew-Tyndale Bible:

4:19 whiche beyng paste repentaunce, haue geuen them selues vnto wantonnes, to worke al maner of vncleanes, euen wyth gredines.
4:20 But ye haue not so learned Christ,

Today's liberals are heavily into Satanism, witchcraft and the occult (all the the same spirit). How can you make such a rant on this forum when ALL your current Democrat leaders are devil worshipers? You need to stop being so damn judgmental and be real. Without humility you cannot be saved. Any Christian who thinks all other Christians are condemned who believe God, and those who hate God are saved, is a warped mind.
 
Today's liberals are heavily into Satanism, witchcraft and the occult (all the the same spirit). How can you make such a rant on this forum when ALL your current Democrat leaders are devil worshipers? You need to stop being so **** judgmental and be real. Without humility you cannot be saved. Any Christian who thinks all other Christians are condemned who believe God, and those who hate God are saved, is a warped mind.

Satan? The Reprobates listened to Satan when they doused Obama.

Witchcraft? Same thing? You have to have God to have witchcraft, not Satan. If you think Satan is God, well, you are that unfortunate.

Do I think the Democrats would do sex voodoo on you; yes, but the Reprobates will **** you up the ***.

Devil worshipers? Do you think when they look to each-other they find the devil? They walk up to their buddy and say, "what has Satan got to say?" They'd be kicked right out of town. There's scores of personalities to go to other than the devil (for sex voodoo).

Occult? I don't know anybody going to Hare Krishna's, "I AM", or even New Age activities; they all feast on dead meat; cow.

This thread isn't about Satan, it's about the Antichrist.
 
Last edited:
Well, I don't care about Kissinger's name, any name put in the algorithm yields 666.

I don't know nothing about the Beast except that he had his tenth horn ripped out

The beast is a computer and it reads your number beginning 666.

The Beast could be the other King and the False Prophet his friend, but I don't know.

Of course he's recovering from a terrible wound, how else could this be fulfilled?

You don't know. Correct
 
You don't know. Correct

Maybe the Best and False Prophet are reflections of the other two, but their own creatures.

I don't know that.

If you have the luxury of someone who knows everything that is nice, but if not then you have to settle for someone who knows some things.
 
The Christians that have been attacked for decades, haven't behaved like Christians for decades. They borrow the name so they can play a pretty role for sheep that can't tell a shepherd from a wolf in shepherd's clothing.

I'm not a democrat, but it's stupid to think that the Democratic party is comprised entirely of atheist's and Muslims. They are by majority, Christians themselves. So I doubt they booed god.

The media criticized Trump's support of moving the embassy to Jerusalem, because it was short sighted, because anyone could see how that would go down. It was a lot of bull****, for what? A symbolic gesture meant to piss the other side off. Jesus would not support that. Read his words. Read history. Christianity spread through out Rome because of it's pacifism. Christians would choose execution over enlistment. Forgiving those that were murdering them, during the act. Just like Jesus did.

And determining whether something is anti Christ, has nothing to do with how his fake ass followers are being treated. It is entirely on how well Jesus philosophy compares to the individual and/or group's philosophy. Trump's is the opposite of Jesus. Making him anti. That's what the word means opposing/opposite. And the people who claim Trump is god's choice, preach greed over grace. The opposite of Christ's philosophy.

Meaning, any Christian the supports Trump, is supporting an anti Christ, and therefor are anti-Christian in their own philosophy. I'll call them AChristians from now on. Let them figure out what the capital A stands for.

I think the best thing to do with that pile of worthless scat is to dig a hole and bury it.
 
Funny, since if Anyone in the world today fits the bill for being the anti-Christ it would be trump. We shall see if true or not.

I have read every prophecy in the Bible many times over about the Antichrist and in order for a man or a political power to be qualified for this position they have to fit each and every prophecy PERFECTLY and FLAWLESSLY! There cannot be anything missing. The Antichrist power must be opposed to ALL religion, showing zero tolerance for any religion. This fits both Islam and atheism. However, the Antichrist must come from the spiritual lineage of Baal and Gnosticism. Islam, and only Islam, fits the bill! Lastly, the number of the beast is 666. This fits Islam perfectly since Allah's number is 666 and the Greek for 666 reads as Arabic to those who read Arabic. Its means "In the name of Allah--Fight!" The word "Fight!" I interpreted as the Greek represents the crossed swords of Islamic power through jihad. The Qur'an itself, written hundreds of years after Revelation, even claims its the beast out of the earth.And, moreover, the spiritual fingerprint of Lucifer is found in the Qur'an.

Donald Trump is a far cry from being the Antichrist. You gotta be pretty warped and morally backwards to even suggest that.
 
I have read every prophecy in the Bible many times over about the Antichrist and in order for a man or a political power to be qualified for this position they have to fit each and every prophecy PERFECTLY and FLAWLESSLY! There cannot be anything missing. The Antichrist power must be opposed to ALL religion, showing zero tolerance for any religion. This fits both Islam and atheism. However, the Antichrist must come from the spiritual lineage of Baal and Gnosticism. Islam, and only Islam, fits the bill! Lastly, the number of the beast is 666. This fits Islam perfectly since Allah's number is 666 and the Greek for 666 reads as Arabic to those who read Arabic. Its means "In the name of Allah--Fight!" The word "Fight!" I interpreted as the Greek represents the crossed swords of Islamic power through jihad. The Qur'an itself, written hundreds of years after Revelation, even claims its the beast out of the earth.And, moreover, the spiritual fingerprint of Lucifer is found in the Qur'an.

Donald Trump is a far cry from being the Antichrist. You gotta be pretty warped and morally backwards to even suggest that.

The number of the beast is 616

While 666 is called the "number of the beast" in most manuscripts of Revelation 13:18,[1] a fragment of the earliest papyrus 115 gives the number as 616.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/616_(number)

https://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134/beasts-real-mark-devalued-to-616

Not that it matters, it's all superstitious nonsense.
 
The identity of the supreme Beast (who is still hidden) is really obvious. In chapter 17 this Beast is connected with the Great Whore. The Great Whore is plainly the Vatican. So the Beast is a Roman Catholic.
In chapter 17 the Beast is also identified as a "king", and a king is always a man. So the Beast is a Roman Catholic man.
The Beast "was, and is not, and is to come." His reappearance "amazes the world" so he must be a world famous man.
The world would not be "amazed" by the reappearance of a non-famous person.
The Beast must be a world famous Roman Catholic man who received a "fatal appearing head wound."
Plainly JFK is the coming supreme Beast .... who is now hidden, will reappear and become world king. And be worshiped by the lost.
 
The identity of the supreme Beast (who is still hidden) is really obvious. In chapter 17 this Beast is connected with the Great Whore. The Great Whore is plainly the Vatican. So the Beast is a Roman Catholic.
In chapter 17 the Beast is also identified as a "king", and a king is always a man. So the Beast is a Roman Catholic man.
The Beast "was, and is not, and is to come." His reappearance "amazes the world" so he must be a world famous man.
The world would not be "amazed" by the reappearance of a non-famous person.
The Beast must be a world famous Roman Catholic man who received a "fatal appearing head wound."
Plainly JFK is the coming supreme Beast .... who is now hidden, will reappear and become world king. And be worshiped by the lost.

Gibberish. Entertaining gibberish. Keep 'em coming.
 
The DNC booed God down on their platform three times! You cannot be a Christian and a liberal at the same time. It is a stark contradiction as liberals are at war with God and all His faithful. And your statement about Christians not behaving as Christians was just outright stupid and extremely judgmental. Do you know every Christian who lives in the world? I bet you don't know any. Anyway, here is a video where the Democrats booed God three times. Now they are totally and completely anti-God and anti-Israel and support Hamas. That is what you support.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8BwqzzqcDs



I have a **** ton of Jewish friends from America and Israel. The Jews are very happy with Trump and now have two Temple commemorative coins out with Trump on them. Trump has done good for Israel. The Democrats want all Jews in Israel to be exterminated and that is now their official position.


Excuse me but who are you? Being a Christians does not mean you believe in evolution, support Islam, murder Jews and vote gay marriage over God's sanctified marriage between a man and a woman. Being a Christian means you have humility and with a statement like yours it shows how you have no humility because you judge faithful believers as hypocrites and give ascendance to nominal Christians (hypocrites).



You know nothing about what you talk about. Trump is a Christian. He is challenging antichrist liberals. To be an antichrist you have to be an anti-christ just as the word says. All liberals are antichrists who support antichrist. The Bible tells us what a Christian is and liberals are considered children of the devil. Trump is trying to save this country from the evil antichrist progressives---the kind you see on this forum ganging up and attacking me for speaking the truth. If you do not have enough sense to understand a single word I have written here then perhaps you are "past repentance" as Tyndale correctly translates.

Ephesians 4:19-20, 1537 Matthew-Tyndale Bible:

4:19 whiche beyng paste repentaunce, haue geuen them selues vnto wantonnes, to worke al maner of vncleanes, euen wyth gredines.
4:20 But ye haue not so learned Christ,

Today's liberals are heavily into Satanism, witchcraft and the occult (all the the same spirit). How can you make such a rant on this forum when ALL your current Democrat leaders are devil worshipers? You need to stop being so damn judgmental and be real. Without humility you cannot be saved. Any Christian who thinks all other Christians are condemned who believe God, and those who hate God are saved, is a warped mind.

Not going to read whatever nonsense you just typed, frankly I don't care if you bastardize your own religion into conforming to your political bias. But let's not kid ourselves. Jesus and Trump are polar opposites. And Jesus doesn't care for tribal squabbles. So you're whole line of bull****, is just bull****.
 
I think the best thing to do with that pile of worthless scat is to dig a hole and bury it.

The day you agree with me, is the day I double check my answer. I have yet to see any kind of logic or sense come from you, it's just a tireless stream of nonsense. You actually convert more people to atheism, than if you were to just leave them alone with your nonsense.
 
The day you agree with me, is the day I double check my answer. I have yet to see any kind of logic or sense come from you, it's just a tireless stream of nonsense. You actually convert more people to atheism, than if you were to just leave them alone with your nonsense.

He's the atheism poster boy.
 
The number of the beast is 616

While 666 is called the "number of the beast" in most manuscripts of Revelation 13:18,[1] a fragment of the earliest papyrus 115 gives the number as 616.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/616_(number)

https://www.religionnewsblog.com/11134/beasts-real-mark-devalued-to-616

Not that it matters, it's all superstitious nonsense.

Its 666 in all Bibles. Liberals focus on a scribal mistake and then call it the Majority Text which it is not. But lets ask the great master scholar William Tyndale to see what the text really says. This is from his 1534 revision of his 1526 translation of the NT.

"Here is wisdome. Let him that hath wytt count the nombre of the beest. For it is the nombre of a man and his nombre is sixe hondred threscore and sixe."

Here's the first Authorized Bible of the Church of England, the 1535 Coverdale Bible which uses most if not all of Tyndale's work on the NT,

"Here is wissdome. Let him that hath wyt, count the nombre of the beest. For it is the nombre of a man, and his nombre is sixe hondred, thre score and sixe."

And here is the best English translation ever done, the 1537 Matthew'Tyndale Bible using all of Tyndale's NT,

"Here is wysdom. Let him that hath wyt counte the numbre of the beaste. For it is the numbre of a man, and hys numbre is syxe hundred thre score and syxe."

From the 2nd Authorized Bible from the Church of England, the 1539 Great Bible which uses most if not all of Tyndale's work,

"Here is wysdome. Let hym that hath wytt, count the nombre of the beast. For it is the nombre of a man, and his nombre is syxe hondred, threscore, and syxe."

Now from the third Authorized Bible of the Church of England, the 1568 Bishop's Bible, which uses most if not all of Tyndale's work,

"Here is wisdome. Let hym that hath witte, count ye number of the beast: For it is the number of a man, & his number is sixe hundred threescore and sixe."

From the fourth Authorized Bible of the Church of England, the 1611 KJV, still using most of Tyndale's work,

"Here is wisedome. Let him that hath vnderstanding, count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is, sixe hundred threescore and sixe."

The Douay-Rheims Bible is an English translation of Jerome's 4th century Latin Vulgate,

"Here is wisdom. He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast. For it is the number of a man: and the number of him is six hundred sixty-six"

From the newest translation of good report, the 2014 Modern English Version (MEV),

"Here is a call for wisdom: Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast. It is the number of a man. His number is six hundred and sixty-six."

Now lets go into some translations done by radical atheists. We'll start with the NRSV,

"This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a person. Its number is six hundred sixty-six."

Now from the Obamacare Bible, the NIV 2011 Edition,

"This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666."

So you see even atheists have translated it 666. There has got to be a reason for that.
 
The day you agree with me, is the day I double check my answer. I have yet to see any kind of logic or sense come from you, it's just a tireless stream of nonsense. You actually convert more people to atheism, than if you were to just leave them alone with your nonsense.

Nuts. You don't make sense with your posting most of the time.
 
Nuts. You don't make sense with your posting most of the time.

I employ actual logic, I wouldn't expect someone who uses bizarro logic to make sense of actual logic. I've mentioned this to you before. In fact, I went through a whole thing were I educated you on what logic actually is, what the rules of it are, and how what you do is not even remotely close to logic.

So I'd be more worried about you understanding something I've said, than I would be you not understanding. Because if Logic man only understands illogical things. Then if Logicman understands it, it must be illogical.

:beat
 
Its 666 in all Bibles. Liberals focus on a scribal mistake and then call it the Majority Text which it is not. But lets ask the great master scholar William Tyndale to see what the text really says. This is from his 1534 revision of his 1526 translation of the NT.

"Here is wisdome. Let him that hath wytt count the nombre of the beest. For it is the nombre of a man and his nombre is sixe hondred threscore and sixe."

Here's the first Authorized Bible of the Church of England, the 1535 Coverdale Bible which uses most if not all of Tyndale's work on the NT,

"Here is wissdome. Let him that hath wyt, count the nombre of the beest. For it is the nombre of a man, and his nombre is sixe hondred, thre score and sixe."

And here is the best English translation ever done, the 1537 Matthew'Tyndale Bible using all of Tyndale's NT,

"Here is wysdom. Let him that hath wyt counte the numbre of the beaste. For it is the numbre of a man, and hys numbre is syxe hundred thre score and syxe."

From the 2nd Authorized Bible from the Church of England, the 1539 Great Bible which uses most if not all of Tyndale's work,

"Here is wysdome. Let hym that hath wytt, count the nombre of the beast. For it is the nombre of a man, and his nombre is syxe hondred, threscore, and syxe."

Now from the third Authorized Bible of the Church of England, the 1568 Bishop's Bible, which uses most if not all of Tyndale's work,

"Here is wisdome. Let hym that hath witte, count ye number of the beast: For it is the number of a man, & his number is sixe hundred threescore and sixe."

From the fourth Authorized Bible of the Church of England, the 1611 KJV, still using most of Tyndale's work,

"Here is wisedome. Let him that hath vnderstanding, count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is, sixe hundred threescore and sixe."

The Douay-Rheims Bible is an English translation of Jerome's 4th century Latin Vulgate,

"Here is wisdom. He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast. For it is the number of a man: and the number of him is six hundred sixty-six"

From the newest translation of good report, the 2014 Modern English Version (MEV),

"Here is a call for wisdom: Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast. It is the number of a man. His number is six hundred and sixty-six."

Now lets go into some translations done by radical atheists. We'll start with the NRSV,

"This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a person. Its number is six hundred sixty-six."

Now from the Obamacare Bible, the NIV 2011 Edition,

"This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666."

So you see even atheists have translated it 666. There has got to be a reason for that.
Read the link. The earliest manuscript says 616. The 666 is a mistranslation. It's not important because it is just more religious nonsense.
 
666 is the fax number of the beast.
 
Human footprints in dinosaur tracks too, and do you think scientists would investigate? No. Shame on them.

To the Christians, this data confirms their viewpoint, but to me it indicates something else.

Uh,., the plaux river tracks. There are two types that are claimed to be human tracks. One is actually a valid footprint, but is a blurred theropod (and going in the opposite direction). The other is one that were hand carved into the rocks for the tourist trade.
 
I employ actual logic, I wouldn't expect someone who uses bizarro logic to make sense of actual logic. I've mentioned this to you before. In fact, I went through a whole thing were I educated you on what logic actually is, what the rules of it are, and how what you do is not even remotely close to logic.

So I'd be more worried about you understanding something I've said, than I would be you not understanding. Because if Logic man only understands illogical things. Then if Logicman understands it, it must be illogical.

In your dreams. Your brand of logic is contrary to the truths of Jesus Christ, who will hold court for all the people who kicked him and his salvation to the curb.
 
Read the link. The earliest manuscript says 616. The 666 is a mistranslation. It's not important because it is just more religious nonsense.

Yeah, because Wikipedia is so reliable...any fool can post anything they like there, you do know that, right?
 
Since the 1930s, dinosaur tracks have been known from the bed of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose, Texas. What makes these tracks so controversial are claims that as well as the footprints of dinosaurs, there are unmistakably human footprints in the same strata. Even creationists admit that some of them are fakes. In some of the ‘man tracks’, it is possible to make out traces of toes to the side of the ‘foot’, which suggests that they are nothing more mysterious than highly eroded three-toed dinosaur tracks. Some also show claw marks at the ‘heel’ of the print, which is another feature typical of a dinosaur footprint but not of a human footprint. In at least one footprint sequence, there is the inexplicable coincidence that dinosaur tracks and ‘human footprints’ alternate.

The Paluxy River ‘man prints’ may resemble human footprints superficially, but they lack the anatomy of real human footprints. Furthermore, dinosaurs and humans are of very different size and weight, but in the Paluxy River, tracks made by some undisputed dinosaurs and supposed humans are sunk to the same depth in the rock, which suggests that both types were made by creatures of the same general weight; there are tracks, made by different dinosaur species sunk to different depths. In the same way, the distances between footfalls of those tracks made to the same depth are spaced the same distance apart, showing that they were made by creatures with similar stride lengths.

The creationist explanation for how the two sets of tracks are found together does not quite match the scenario they propose. The creatures that made the tracks were supposed to have been running from the rising waters of the Great Flood. However, there are several thousand feet of water-deposited sedimentary rock beneath the footprints and several thousand feet on top of them, both of which ought, according to creationist beliefs about geology, have been deposited by the waters of the same Flood the creatures were fleeing. To have produced this sequence, the base rock would have to be deposited by an early ‘high tide’ of the Flood, which then receded long enough for the dinosaurs and humans to run across the valley and leave their tracks, subsequently covering them with a tidal wave that sealed them with a layer of mud, without damaging them. This sequence would have been repeated on numerous occasions, as the dinosaur and ‘human’ tracks appear in a number of superimposed layers. The biggest problem with this, of course, is the question of where the creatures had remained hidden during the early stages of the universal flood if they were rushing to higher land later. But logic never got in the way of religious dogma…

The tracks were investigated by Glen Kuban in the 1980s, whose investigations showed that the tracks are not human footprints. The supposed “manprints” were made by the same three-toed dinosaurs: they appear to be human because only the middle toe is visible. In a number of cases, “manprints” have subsequently eroded to show their true origin
The Paluxy River ?footprints? - Bad Archaeology
 
In your dreams. Your brand of logic is contrary to the truths of Jesus Christ, who will hold court for all the people who kicked him and his salvation to the curb.

There is only one brand of logic. The fact you have to create a second type to justify what you think of as logical, is in itself illogical.
 
There is only one brand of logic. The fact you have to create a second type to justify what you think of as logical, is in itself illogical.

Religious logic is a contradiction in terms.
 
Back
Top Bottom