• We will be taking the forum down for maintenance at [3:30 PM CDT] - in 25 minutes. We should be down less than 1 hour.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

God is Dead

If it is a question from Angel, I have had Angel on ignore for months, so I have not seen any question about the Torah...
Well, that's convenient, if nothing else. And you're here to discuss and debate, yes? ;)
This thread was started by Angel. So you never even read the OP.

Namaste.
 
...
Now, if you would address the questions concerning the Torah that Angel noticed you're ignoring, I would be ever grateful...
Thanks for forcing the issue, gfm.
What sort of interlocutor comes to a debate forum and puts others on Ignore!
 
That point is.. you do not know who wrote the gospels. You know who the gospels are attributed to, but you do not know who wrote them. Not only that.. I can use strictly Christian theologians to make that point. I can even avoid bishop spong, and not use Bart Erhman at all with my references.

That point is...it doesn't look like anyone cares what you think you can prove...
 
Well, that's convenient, if nothing else. And you're here to discuss and debate, yes? ;)
This thread was started by Angel. So you never even read the OP.

Namaste.

Yet he trapses into every thread you start...amazing...SMH...
 
That point is...it doesn't look like anyone cares what you think you can prove...

When people make bad claims, and lie, then I am going to call them on it. That means when people lie about what the evidence is..I am going to challenge them on it. If you want to keep looking bad, by all means, ignore the challenge and keep on showing off you don't know what you are talking about.
 
If it is a question from Angel, I have had Angel on ignore for months, so I have not seen any question about the Torah. When it comes to the concerning Jesus's death, and burial, and post-mortum appearance.... let's see your non-biblical sources for those... Can you show any that are indeed independent of the Christian scriptures? None of the standard ones (Pliney, Tacitus) are independent, and the passages in Josephus are insertions

All your questions are answered here...

https://crossexamined.org/quick-case-jesus-resurrection/
 
When people make bad claims, and lie, then I am going to call them on it. That means when people lie about what the evidence is..I am going to challenge them on it. If you want to keep looking bad, by all means, ignore the challenge and keep on showing off you don't know what you are talking about.

lol...you pose no challenge to any believer here...
 
Thanks for forcing the issue, gfm.
What sort of interlocutor comes to a debate forum and puts others on Ignore!

One not confident in his positions apparently...
 
When people make bad claims, and lie, then I am going to call them on it. That means when people lie about what the evidence is..I am going to challenge them on it. If you want to keep looking bad, by all means, ignore the challenge and keep on showing off you don't know what you are talking about.[bold mine]
"Ignore the challenge" indeed. ;)
 
I do all the time... Some people appear to be oblivious to themselves though ..

No, I don't think you do...you have no idea how you come off...
 
And what about that do you find convicning? Can you show that you have read that, and understand it, and know what the objections to it are? Sorry..raw links just don't cut it.

Every single point is quite convincing... I could have typed a similar thing out for you, but why take the time when a link sums it all up quite well. There is definitely evidence for it.
 
Every single point is quite convincing... I could have typed a similar thing out for you, but why take the time when a link sums it all up quite well. There is definitely evidence for it.

Only if you want to believe. TO me, the whole resurrection story has one big missing element. That is the 'plausibility' element. I don't view the stories as an historical event. I also think you are vastly exaggerating the evidence.
 
Would you record, in public writing, truly embarrassing things about yourself, your peers, and your "Messiah"?

Far from it...men are known for their "big fish" tales...:2razz:
 
Only if you want to believe. TO me, the whole resurrection story has one big missing element. That is the 'plausibility' element. I don't view the stories as an historical event. I also think you are vastly exaggerating the evidence.

What's not "plausible" about it?

If it was done on multiple occasions, then it wouldn't be nearly as "noteworthy" as it is, and you and I are currently living in the greatest miracle to ever happen, so any other miracle (such as resurrection) is definitely possible.
 
What's not "plausible" about it?

If it was done on multiple occasions, then it wouldn't be nearly as "noteworthy" as it is, and you and I are currently living in the greatest miracle to ever happen, so any other miracle (such as resurrection) is definitely possible.

Can you show how someone who is physically dead for 3 days come back to life??
 
Back
Top Bottom