• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cardinal Pell exonerated on Appeal!

roughdraft274 said:
I never said that.

"a history of covering for other child rapists in the church."

If you don't think covering for child rapists is a bad thing then that's your problem.
Click to expand...

You weakened your argument by conflating a crime for which Pell was convicted with allegations of a different crime with which he has not been charged, namely failing to inform police regarding other clergy waywardness.
 
phattonez said:
Oh so you're not just interested in discussing abuse wherever we find it?
Click to expand...

I condemn all pedophilia and I'm passionately anti-religious so I'm not sure what you're looking for.

Your point was that they're every bit as ridiculous as Christianity right? I agree.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
I condemn all pedophilia and I'm passionately anti-religious so I'm not sure what you're looking for.

Your point was that they're every bit as ridiculous as Christianity right? I agree.
Click to expand...
Yet you never talk about them. Only Catholicism. I wonder why.
 
phattonez said:
Yet you never talk about them. Only Catholicism. I wonder why.
Click to expand...

You've called me out before on being "too anti-religious", now you're trying to claim I'm only anti-catholic? You think I'm running around supporting orthodox judaism? You're getting pathetic and your inability to stay on topic or actually debate is noted. Start a thread about pedophiles in orthodox judaism and I'll head over there and criticize them heavily.

I don't know what it is with you religious nuts diddling kids, but you need to stop.
 
Jean-s said:
You weakened your argument by conflating a crime for which Pell was convicted with allegations of a different crime with which he has not been charged, namely failing to inform police regarding other clergy waywardness.
Click to expand...
What exactly is my argument? Because I dont think you actually kmow what it is.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
roughdraft274 said:
What exactly is my argument? Because I dont think you actually kmow what it is.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Slander an innocent man with baseless accusations, apparently.
 
Jean-s said:
I don't think you actually know either.
Click to expand...
You claimed I weakened my argument. Are you now saying you dont even know my argument?



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
roughdraft274 said:
You claimed I weakened my argument. Are you now saying you dont even know my argument?



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I advised you to stick to one topic at a time.
 
Jean-s said:
I advised you to stick to one topic at a time.
Click to expand...
So you claimed that i weakened my argument yet you cant tell me what my argument is?

Friendly advice... really think about and determine what you think someone is saying before you try to tell them something about what they are saying.

Also, man up. Seriously. You thought i was arguing that he should be in jail, then i asked you what my argument was and you went nack and realized I never argued for that. Just man up and admit you read it wrong or made an assumption. Theres nothing wrong with a simple mistake if you own up to it.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
roughdraft274 said:
So you claimed that i weakened my argument yet you cant tell me what my argument is?

Friendly advice... really think about and determine what you think someone is saying before you try to tell them something about what they are saying.

Also, man up. Seriously. You thought i was arguing that he should be in jail, then i asked you what my argument was and you went nack and realized I never argued for that. Just man up and admit you read it wrong or made an assumption. Theres nothing wrong with a simple mistake if you own up to it.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You are confusing me with someone else.
 
Jean-s said:
You are confusing me with someone else.
Click to expand...
No actually, im not. Youre the guy who told me ive weakened my argument at which point you couldnt even tell me what my argument is.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
roughdraft274 said:
No actually, im not. Youre the guy who told me ive weakened my argument at which point you couldnt even tell me what my argument is.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I am not the subject of this thread. Neither is Pell's neglect to inform the police about clergy conduct. The topic is Pell's appeal.
 
Jean-s said:
I am not the subject of this thread. Neither is Pell's neglect to inform the police about clergy conduct. The topic is Pell's appeal.
Click to expand...
What argument did i make that i made weaker?

Quit evading. Man up.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom