• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rage Space? Muslim Safe Space Draws Aussie Ire

CaptainCourtesy said:
Your list was invalid. This is not surprising. And just because you don't feel humiliation, doesn't mean you were not humiliated.
Click to expand...

When are you going to realize that what you say is not gospel? An irritating shortcoming, to say the least.
 
coldjoint said:
~.......................That is far more important than hiding behind numbers you have chosen that work for you. ..................~
Click to expand...
Interesting how you've now moved on from the false numbers you claimed, once they were debunked.

Interesting also how those numbers seem to show what works for the vast majority of Muslim, with that not being anything what you claim.

The rest of your above rant is just another tedious repetition of your equally tedious mantra, as always corroborated by zilch.

So not even worthy of any further address by the otherwise convenient c & p feature, since it's all been dealt with long ago.
 
coldjoint said:
Explain how minimizing a serious problem, that is getting worse, is in anyway helpful to solving the problem? You are willfully ignorant of reality. Therefore what I say is not dishonest it is relevant to the problem you wish to ignore. Saying the vast majority of Muslims do not commit acts of terror while ignoring the ones that do and the religious doctrine that make terrorists, out of fear and the need to be popular. Neither should ever influence an objective look at anything. Anyone who plays by those rules really is not worth talking to, but here we are.

That is far more important than hiding behind numbers you have chosen that work for you. And using words like bigot ,when Islam is the original KKK and Nazis rolled into one, yep, calling people bigots and supporting Islam as anything else than what it is(proven by the literature and actions) hypocrisy in it purest form.
Click to expand...
And so again a post is quoted and the blather of the response has nothing to do with anything in the quoted post.

Here primarily (it would seem), to cowardly run from the further two challenges presented in the post quoted for response.

Flailing around like a hen that's been decapitated.
 
coldjoint said:
When are you going to realize that what you say is not gospel? An irritating shortcoming, to say the least.
Click to expand...
When are you going to realize that whatever you say in pursuit of your favourite obsession matters not at all.

Your total lack of credibility having disqualified you long ago.
 
Chagos said:
Interesting how you've now moved on from the false numbers you claimed, once they were debunked.

Interesting also how those numbers seem to show what works for the vast majority of Muslim, with that not being anything what you claim.

The rest of your above rant is just another tedious repetition of your equally tedious mantra, as always corroborated by zilch.



So not even worthy of any further address by the otherwise convenient c & p feature, since it's all been dealt with long ago.
Click to expand...

How can you be sure what Muslims think? The religious doctrine keeps you guessing, doesn't it? Anything else?
 
Chagos said:
And so again a post is quoted and the blather of the response has nothing to do with anything in the quoted post.

Here primarily (it would seem), to cowardly run from the further two challenges presented in the post quoted for response.

Flailing around like a hen that's been decapitated.
Click to expand...


Those challenges were answered. You will not bully me into saying they were not with your repetition and dissatisfaction with my answers.

Anything new?.
 
Chagos said:
When are you going to realize that whatever you say in pursuit of your favourite obsession matters not at all.

Your total lack of credibility having disqualified you long ago.
Click to expand...

No I don't. What part of that don't you get?
 
coldjoint said:
How can you be sure what Muslims think? The religious doctrine keeps you guessing, doesn't it? Anything else?
Click to expand...
Contrary to you I've met hundreds where, by all appearances, you've never even met a single one.

Of course that doesn't mean I can speak for the whole approx. 1.6 billion but you can't speak for anything at all.

In fact judging by how you'd clearly be completely mute without all those sites that pre-gurgitate stuff for you, it looks as though you can't even speak for yourself.
 
coldjoint said:
See, you don't get it.:lamo
Click to expand...
Nobody can make sense of what, by it's total lack of syntax (let alone context), need be seen as gibberish.

For those caring to read (and I fully understand all that don't)
Chagos said:
coldjoint said:
No I don't. What part of that don't you get?
Click to expand...
When are you going to realize that whatever you say in pursuit of your favourite obsession matters not at all.

Your total lack of credibility having disqualified you long ago.
Click to expand...
Makes one wonder whether you even remember what you're responding to.
 
Last edited:
I guess this one is being swept under the carpet again in the usual dishonest and cowardly manner.
Chagos said:
coldjoint said:
Chagos said:
and so the lying continues.
Click to expand...
Those challenges were answered. You will not bully me into saying they were not with your repetition and dissatisfaction with my answers.

Anything new?.
Click to expand...
And so again a post is quoted and the blather of the response has nothing to do with anything in the quoted post.

Here primarily (it would seem), to cowardly run from the further two challenges presented in the post quoted for response.

Flailing around like a hen that's been decapitated.
Click to expand...
 
Chagos said:
Nobody can make sense of what, by it's total lack of syntax (let alone context), need be seen as gibberish.

For those caring to read (and I fully understand all that don't) Makes one wonder whether you even remember what you're responding to.
Click to expand...

Everything but Islam. Talk about babble. Please.:lamo
 
stevecanuck said:
Bingo! We have a winner.

It looks as though I got through to you. My example of a false dichotomy mirrors your inference that it's only the Muslims who commit acts of terrorism who support such acts. I'm glad you finally see your argument for what it is. We're making progress.
Click to expand...

The logical fallacy that you are falling into now, is the fallacy of absolutes. I never made that claim that NO Muslin who has not committed a terrorist act does not support those acts. In fact, the Pew Research poll that I have linked to demonstrates that this is not true. Now, this in now way invalidates my position.
 
coldjoint said:
Explain how minimizing a serious problem, that is getting worse, is in anyway helpful to solving the problem? You are willfully ignorant of reality. Therefore what I say is not dishonest it is relevant to the problem you wish to ignore. Saying the vast majority of Muslims do not commit acts of terror while ignoring the ones that do and the religious doctrine that make terrorists, out of fear and the need to be popular. Neither should ever influence an objective look at anything. Anyone who plays by those rules really is not worth talking to, but here we are.

That is far more important than hiding behind numbers you have chosen that work for you. And using words like bigot ,when Islam is the original KKK and Nazis rolled into one, yep, calling people bigots and supporting Islam as anything else than what it is(proven by the literature and actions) hypocrisy in it purest form.
Click to expand...

You're doing it again. Refusing to respond to questions that I have asked in response to direct accusations that you have made. This is FURTHER evidence of your dishonest posting on this subject. Tell me, coldjoint... why are you so frightened to answer rather simple questions that challenge you on things that YOU say? And why is it that you are so frightened of discussing the reality of Islamic terrorist acts? You really have no idea how badly your lying hurts your position, do you?
 
coldjoint said:
What criticism of the religion is invalid? Be specific, and no numbers. Discuss the doctrine or hit the road.
Click to expand...

Let's try something. Let's see if you will show some integrity. Admit that you, originally changed the goalposts on my initial comment, added "LITERATURE" in an effort to shift the discussion, thereby admitting that your comment was dishonest. You do that, and I'll answer your question. You don't, and you should be the one hitting the road, because I will just keep repeating my challenges until you show some integrity.
 
coldjoint said:
When are you going to realize that what you say is not gospel? An irritating shortcoming, to say the least.
Click to expand...

When are you going to realize that when you get proven wrong... which happens quite often, it means YOU ARE WRONG. Not recognizing this is certainly an irritating shortcoming.
 
coldjoint said:
Those challenges were answered.
Click to expand...

Not one was. Here they are again. And the list grows:

1) Your refusal to answer this challenge in any honest or complete way: How could ISIS be the embodiment of Islam, if the VAST majority of Muslims do not support ISIS or behave as ISIS does? Explain the disconnect.
2) Your refusal to post my entire comment about Muhammad, in context.
3) Your dishonesty on my position of religious interpretation.
4) Your dishonesty on whether I said I would answer steve's true/false question or not.
5) Your dishonesty in responding to the question, "what percentage of Muslims carry out terrorist acts".
6) Please explain how quoting the percentage of terrorist acts carried out by Muslims indicates that any act of terror is acceptable.
7) Please point out anywhere that I have stated that I have accepted terror or that terror is acceptable.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
The logical fallacy that you are falling into now, is the fallacy of absolutes. I never made that claim that NO Muslin who has not committed a terrorist act does not support those acts. In fact, the Pew Research poll that I have linked to demonstrates that this is not true. Now, this in now way invalidates my position.
Click to expand...

Then why are you asking the question?
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
You're doing it again. Refusing to respond to questions that I have asked in response to direct accusations that you have made. This is FURTHER evidence of your dishonest posting on this subject. Tell me, coldjoint... why are you so frightened to answer rather simple questions that challenge you on things that YOU say? And why is it that you are so frightened of discussing the reality of Islamic terrorist acts? You really have no idea how badly your lying hurts your position, do you?
Click to expand...

I am not frightened of anything. What is the reality? They kill, you count? You are not looking at the reality of what causes terror and its increasing popularity. Have you thought past anything than arguing about a killer and how long you can put off confronting it? Doesn't look like it.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
When are you going to realize that when you get proven wrong... which happens quite often, it means YOU ARE WRONG. Not recognizing this is certainly an irritating shortcoming.
Click to expand...

Getting close to an original statement?
 
coldjoint said:
I am not frightened of anything. What is the reality? They kill, you count? You are not looking at the reality of what causes terror and its increasing popularity. Have you thought past anything than arguing about a killer and how long you can put off confronting it? Doesn't look like it.
Click to expand...
And so again a post is quoted and the blather of the response has nothing to do with anything in the quoted post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom