• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Japan-South Korea Trade War

ThirdTerm

Proud Deplorable Patriot
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
1,002
Reaction score
242
Location
Trumplandia
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Conservative


Japan’s Ministry of Trade imposed “a de facto embargo” of certain products for sale to South Korea, which would damage South Korea's high tech industry. South Korea imports 91.9 percent of its resist, 43.9 percent of its etching gas, and 93.7 percent of its polyimides from Japan. All of them are banned from being sold to South Korean firms after South Korea was removed from its “white list” of countries where items of national security concern can be exported without needing a permit. It's been suspected that these items were illegally exported to North Korea, given the current government's leaning toward North Korea.

This week, Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry announced new restrictions on exports to South Korea of key materials used in tech manufacturing, a move that ups the ante amidst a period of increased tensions between the two countries.

The core issue is an ongoing debate over South Korean court rulings that have allowed individual Korean citizens to sue Japanese companies for compensation over their use of forced labor during World War II. As far as Japan is concerned, all issues related to wartime conduct were settled in 1965 when the two countries signed agreements establishing diplomatic and economic relations that included some reparations for Japanese actions during the war. However, since then Korean activists have disputed the agreement, saying that it did not sufficiently compensate victims, including comfort women and forced laborers, and did not reflect sincere atonement for the Japanese government’s actions during the war.

Last fall, these groups gained major momentum when South Korea’s Supreme Court officially ruled that the 1965 agreement resolved intergovernmental disputes, but did not bar individuals from suing Japanese companies directly. In two related rulings, the Supreme Court ordered Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation to pay four plaintiffs 100 million won ($88,740) each in compensation, and ordered Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. to pay compensation ranging from 80-120 million won to 10 additional plaintiffs. After the two companies repeatedly refused to pay the awarded compensation, local Korean courts approved the seizure of corporate assets held in South Korea in order to fulfill the Supreme Court’s verdict. These rulings have opened the floodgates, much to Japan’s chagrin — according to Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, there are more than a dozen additional cases pending that could impact more than 70 companies.

Japan-South Korea Spat Threatens to Morph Into Trade War | The Diplomat
 
Back
Top Bottom